This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of
[[Page 1977]]
this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal Register document through the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov , you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's pilot eCFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr. C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPAHQOPP20070546 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or before March 11, 2008.

In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit this copy, identified by docket ID number EPAHQOPP20070546, by one of the following methods:

II. Background

In the Federal Register of October 3, 2007 (72 FR 56325) (FRL8151 6), EPA issued a proposed rule pursuant to sections 408(e) and 701(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). The proposed rule explained the Agency's determination that the use of the fungicide thiabendazole [2(4thiazolyl)benzimidazole] as a seed treatment on dry peas does not need an FFDCA tolerance or tolerance exemption based on EPA's finding that any residues that remain in food from this use will be both nondetectable and below the level of regulatory concern. The proposed rule included a discussion of the Agency's threshold of regulation (TOR) policy and identified the information (including toxicity data, residue data and the analytical method) that EPA relied on in making this TOR determination; it also established a 60day public comment period. There were no comments received in response to the proposed rule.

III. Action on the Proposed Regulation

Based upon the rationale and findings set forth in the proposed rule, the use of thiabendazole as a seed treatment on dry peas (including field pea, pigeon pea, chickpea or lentil) is designated as below the threshold of regulatory concern and thus as not requiring a tolerance or a tolerance exemption under FFDCA. The use is identified as such under 40 CFR 180.2010 (Threshold of regulation determinations).

Designation of this use as below the level of regulatory concern does not legalize any detectable residues of thiabendazole on food. It does mean that, despite labeling for this use on a food or feed crop, it may be registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., without obtaining a tolerance or exemption from the requirement of a tolerance as otherwise required by 40 CFR 152.112(g). The text of the regulation has been clarified on this point.

Adequate analytical methodology (High Pressure Liquid Chromatography/Fluorescence Detector (HPLC/FLD) method) is available to detect residues of thiabendazole in/on dry peas. The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 207555350; telephone number: (410) 3052905; email address: residuemethods@epa.gov. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993, as amended by Executive Order 13422, 72 FR 2763, January 18, 2007). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (66 FR 28355), May 22, 2001 or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks or Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and LowIncome Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency, for the reasons explained in the proposed rule, certifies that this rule will not have a significant adverse economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because this rule does not have any adverse economic impacts.

This rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (59 FR 22951, November 6, 2000) do not apply to this rule. In addition, this rule does not impose an enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded
[[Page 1978]]

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 1044).

This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

V. Congressional Review Act

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: December 31, 2007.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.2010 is amended by adding text to read as follows: Sec. 180.2010 Threshold of regulation determinations.

The following pesticide chemical uses on food or feed, or food or feed crops, do not need a tolerance or exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, and may be registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., without obtaining such tolerance or exemption, based on EPA's determination that the uses are below the threshold of regulation.
CAS Reg.
Pesticide Chemical No. Use/Limits Analytical Method Thiabendazole............................ 148798 As a seed treatment for dry High Performance Liquid pea (including field pea, Chromatography/Florescence pigeon pea, chickpea or Detector method\1\; lentil), using a maximum Modification of Ion application rate of 0.075 Pairing Liquid pounds of active Chromatographic ingredient per 100 pounds Determination of of seed. Vines or hay Benzimidazole Fungicides grown from treated seed in Foods, Gilvydis and may not be fed to Walters, JAOAC, vol. 73, livestock.. no. 5, 1990. \1\Available from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 207555350; telephone number: (410) 3052905; email address: residuemethods@epa.gov [FR Doc. E8267 Filed 11008; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656050S

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Susan Stanton, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 204600001; telephone number: (703) 3055218; email address: stanton.susan@epa.gov.