Browse: Departments   Dates   Agencies  

CFR Citation: 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

EPA ID: [EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0625; FRL-8515-2]

NOTICE: RULES

ACTION: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans:

DOCUMENT ACTION: Final rule.

SUBJECT CATEGORY: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the York (York and Adams Counties) 8- Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Approval of the Area's Maintenance Plan and 2002 Base Year Inventory

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on February 13, 2008.

DOCUMENT SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) is requesting that the York (York and Adams Counties) ozone nonattainment area (York Area) be redesignated as attainment for the 8hour ozone ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). EPA is approving the ozone redesignation request for York Area. In conjunction with its redesignation request, PADEP submitted a SIP revision consisting of a maintenance plan for York Area, which EPA is
[[Page 2164]]
approving, that provides for continued attainment of the 8hour ozone NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. EPA is also approving the motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) and the adequacy determination for those MVEBs that are identified in the York Area maintenance plan for purposes of transportation conformity. In addition, EPA is approving the 2002 base year inventory for the York Area that PADEP submitted. EPA is approving the redesignation request, the maintenance plan, and the 2002 base year emissions inventory as revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

SUMMARY: Pennsylvania,

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

On October 24, 2007 (72 FR 60296), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The NPR proposed approval of Pennsylvania's redesignation request and maintenance plan SIP revisions for the York Area that provide for continued attainment of the 8hour ozone NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. The NPR also proposed approval of a 2002 base year emissions inventory for the York Area. The formal SIP revisions were submitted by PADEP on June 14, 2007. Other specific requirements of Pennsylvania's redesignation request and maintenance plan SIP revisions, and the rationales for EPA's proposed actions, are explained in the NPR and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on the NPR.

However, on December 22, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA's Phase 1 Implementation Rule for the 8hour Ozone Standard. (69 FR 23591, April 30, 2004). South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C.Cir. 2006). On June 8, 2007, in South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. EPA, Docket No. 041201, in response to several petitions for rehearing, the DC Circuit clarified that the Phase 1 Rule was vacated only with regard to those parts of the rule that had been successfully challenged. Therefore, the Phase 1 Rule provisions related to classifications for areas currently classified under subpart 2 of Title I, part D of the CAA as 8hour nonattainment areas, the 8hour attainment dates and the timing for emissions reductions needed for attainment of the 8hour ozone NAAQS remain effective. The June 8 decision left intact the Court's rejection of EPA's reasons for implementing the 8hour standard in certain nonattainment areas under subpart 1 in lieu of subpart 2. By limiting the vacatur, the Court let stand EPA's revocation of the 1hour standard and those anti backsliding provisions of the Phase 1 Rule that had not been successfully challenged. The June 8 decision reaffirmed the December 22, 2006 decision that EPA had improperly failed to retain measures required for 1hour nonattainment areas under the antibacksliding provisions of the regulations: (1) Nonattainment area New Source Review (NSR) requirements based on an area's 1hour nonattainment
classification; (2) Section 185 penalty fees for the 1hour severe or extreme nonattainment areas; and (3) measures to be implemented pursuant to section 172(c)(9) or 182(c)(9) of the CAA, on the contingency of an area not making reasonable further progress toward attainment of the 1hour NAAQS, or for failure to attain NAAQS. In addition, the June 8 decision clarified that the Court's reference to conformity requirements for antibacksliding purposes was limited to requiring the continued use of the 1hour motor vehicle emissions budgets until 8hour budgets were available for 8hour conformity determinations, which is already required under EPA's conformity regulations. The Court thus clarified the 1hour conformity determinations are not required for antibacksliding purposes.

For the reasons set forth in the proposal, EPA does not believe that the Court's rulings alter any requirements relevant to this redesignation action so as to preclude redesignation, and do not prevent EPA from finalizing this redesignation. EPA believes that the Court's December 22, 2006 and June 8, 2007 decisions impose no impediment to moving forward with redesignation of this area to attainment, because even in the light of the Court's decisions, redesignation is appropriate under the relevant redesignation provisions of the CAA and longstanding policies regarding redesignation requests.

II. Final Action

EPA is approving the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's redesignation request, maintenance plan, and 2002 base year emissions inventory SIP revisions because they satisfy the requirements for approval. EPA has evaluated Pennsylvania's redesignation request that was submitted on June 14, 2007 and determined that it meets the redesignation criteria set forth in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. EPA believes that the redesignation request and monitoring data demonstrate that the York Area has attained the 8hour ozone standard. The final approval of this redesignation request will change the designation of the York Area from nonattainment to attainment for the 8hour ozone standard. EPA is approving the maintenance plan for the York Area submitted on June 14, 2007 as a revision to the Pennsylvania SIP. EPA is also approving the MVEBs submitted by PADEP in conjunction with its redesignation request. In addition, EPA is approving the 2002 base year emissions inventory submitted by PADEP on June 14, 2007 as a revision to the Pennsylvania SIP. In this final rulemaking, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the MVEBs for NOX and VOCs in the York Area for the 8hour ozone maintenance plan are adequate and approved for conformity purposes. As a result of our finding, the York Area must use the MVEBs from the submitted 8hour ozone maintenance plan for future conformity determinations. The adequate and approved MVEBs are provided in the following table:
[[Page 2165]]
Adequate and Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Tons per Day (TPD)
Budget year VOC NOX 2009.................................... 15.9 22.8 2018.................................... 9.0 10.0

The York Area is subject to the CAA's requirement for the basic nonattainment areas until and unless it is redesignated to attainment. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Redesignation is an action that affects the status of a geographical area and does not impose any new regulatory requirements on sources. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.). Because this rule approves preexisting requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 1044). This final rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Because this action affects the status of a geographical area, does not impose any new requirements on sources, or allows the state to avoid adopting or implementing other requirements, this action also does not have federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Redesignation is an action that affects the status of a geographical area and does not impose any new requirements on sources. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 14, 2008. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.

This action, approving the redesignation of the York Area to attainment for the 8hour ozone NAAQS, the associated maintenance plan, the MVEBs identified in the maintenance plan and the 2002 base year emission inventory, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 81

Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas.

Dated: December 27, 2007.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:
PART 52[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart NNPennsylvania
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (e)(1) is amended by adding an entry at the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 2166]]
(1) * * *
Name of nonregulatory SIP Applicable State submittal Additional revision geographic area date EPA approval date explanation * * * * * * * 8Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan York, PA: Adams 06/14/07.......... 01/14/08, [Insert and 2002 Base Year Emissions County, York page number where Inventory. County. the document begins]. * * * * *
PART 81[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
4. In Sec. 81.339, the table entitled ``PennsylvaniaOzone (8Hour Standard)'' is amended by revising the entry for York, PA, Adams County and York County to read as follows:
Sec. 81.339 Pennsylvania.
* * * * *
PennsylvaniaOzone (8hour Standard) Designation \a\ Category/classification Designated area
Date \1\ Type Date \1\ Type * * * * * * * York, PA: Adams County, York County..... 02/13/08 Attainment............................... \a\ Includes Indian County located in each county or area, except otherwise noted. \1\ This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8268 Filed 11108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656050P

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by e- mail at quinto.rose@epa.gov.