Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FAA-2008-0149; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-319-AD]
RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, - 300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 737100, 200, 200C, 300, 400, and 500 series airplanes. This proposed AD would require replacing the existing straightto90degree hose assembly for the Lavatory ``A'' water supply. The replacement is a new straight hose assembly and a separate 90degree elbow fitting. This proposed AD results from a report of a separated hose assembly for the passenger water system. We are proposing this AD to prevent a water leak into the flight deck ceiling, which could result in an electrical short and possible loss of several functions essential to safe flight.
SUMMARY: Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes,
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA20080149; Directorate Identifier 2007NM319AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov , including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.
We have received a report of a separated hose assembly for the passenger water system. The hose assembly supplies potable water through a 90degree end fitting to Lavatory ``A.'' The break occurred at the 90degree end fitting when the elbow separated at a soldered joint adjacent to the hose assembly sleeve. The break was located just above and inside the flight deck entry door, and resulted in water spilling into the flight deck ceiling, which affected various radios and the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) and caused them to become inoperative. These affected parts had to be replaced due to water damage. An analysis of the broken hose assembly showed signs of previous small leaks. It was concluded that an incompletely soldered joint failed and consequently separated. A broken hose assembly in this location, if not corrected, could leak into the flight deck ceiling and result in an electrical short and possible loss of several functions essential to safe flight.
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 73738A1054, dated August 23, 2007. The service bulletin describes procedures for replacing the existing straightto90degree hose assembly for the Lavatory ``A'' water supply. The replacement is a new straight hose assembly and a separate 90degree elbow fitting.
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other airplanes of the same type design. This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously.
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 779 airplanes of
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take between 4 and 7
workhours per airplane to comply with this proposed AD, depending on
the airplane configuration. The average labor rate is $80 per work
hour. Required parts would cost about $400 per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the
[[Page 7489]]
cost of this proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be between $560,880 and $747,840, or between $720 and $960 per product.
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA20080149; Directorate Identifier 2007NM 319AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 24, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model 737100, 200, 200C, 300, 400,
and 500 series airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 73738A1054, dated August 23, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of a separated hose assembly
for the passenger water system. We are issuing this AD to prevent a
water leak into the flight deck ceiling, which could result in an
electrical short and possible loss of several functions essential to safe flight.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.
Replacement
(f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the existing straightto90degree hose assembly for the
Lavatory ``A'' water supply with a new straight hose assembly and a separate 90degree elbow fitting, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737 38A1054, dated August 23, 2007.
Parts Installation
(g) As of the effective date of this AD, any hose assembly part
having a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD must not be
used in any location that is subject to the requirements of this AD.
However, those parts may be used in other locations if not otherwise prohibited.
Table 1.Spare Parts Prohibited for This AD
Airplane group identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 73738A1054, Existing part Nos. dated August 23, 2007
1 and 2................................ 1061998430, AS4471080401, or AS4471080404.
3...................................... 106199825 or 1060871125.
4...................................... 106199831 or 1060871139. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, ATTN: Marcia Smith, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and
Environmental Systems Branch, ANM150S, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 980573356; telephone (425) 9176484; fax (425)
9176590; has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 31, 2008. Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E82353 Filed 2708; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Marcia Smith, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 980573356; telephone (425) 9176484; fax (425) 9176590.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 26 CFR Part 301 50 CFR Part 622 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 49 CFR Part 571 44 CFR Part 64 14 CFR Part 23 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229