Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FAA-2008-0272; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-275-AD]
RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000 Airplanes
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
In service events have shown that, after implementation of Dassault Aviation SB
[[Page 13512]]
F2000133 and F2000166, a risk of engine cowlings separation from
the airplane still exists, and may cause potential damages to the engine itself and to the horizontal stabilizer.
It is suspected that onground improper latching may lead to a
radial deformation of engine cowlings in flight and to their
eventual escape out of their locking devices. This situation may
represent a hazard to the aircraft propulsive system and/or its structural integrity.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
SUMMARY: Dassault Model Falcon 2000 Airplanes,
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA20080272; Directorate Identifier 2007NM275AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued Airworthiness Directive 20070016, dated January 12, 2007 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
In service events have shown that, after implementation of Dassault Aviation SB F2000133 and F2000166, a risk of engine cowlings separation from the airplane still exists, and may cause potential damages to the engine itself and to the horizontal stabilizer.
It is suspected that onground improper latching may lead to a radial deformation of engine cowlings in flight and to their eventual escape out of their locking devices. This situation may represent a hazard to the aircraft propulsive system and/or its structural integrity.
The purpose of this Airworthiness Directive (AD) is to secure
safe closure of engine cowlings and improve the existing locking devices.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Dassault has issued Service Bulletins F2000166, Revision 1, dated October 24, 2001, and F2000298, Revision 3, dated September 26, 2007. The actions described in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 229 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 90 workhours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per workhour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $1,648,800, or $7,200 per product.
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
[[Page 13513]]
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA20080272; Directorate Identifier 2007NM275AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by April 14, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model Falcon 2000 airplanes,
certificated in any category, all serial numbers, except those that
have incorporated Modification M2275 during production or Dassault Service Bulletin F2000298 in service.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54: Nacelles/Pylons.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
In service events have shown that, after implementation of Dassault Aviation SB F2000133 and F2000166, a risk of engine cowlings separation from the airplane still exists, and may cause potential damages to the engine itself and to the horizontal stabilizer.
It is suspected that onground improper latching may lead to a radial deformation of engine cowlings in flight and to their eventual escape out of their locking devices. This situation may represent a hazard to the aircraft propulsive system and/or its structural integrity.
The purpose of this Airworthiness Directive (AD) is to secure
safe closure of engine cowlings and improve the existing locking devices.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Modify the existing engine cowls locking system in
accordance with the instructions contained in Dassault Service Bulletin F2000298, Revision 3, dated September 26, 2007.
(2) Before or concurrent with the modification required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, modify the engine cowling attachments
in accordance with the instructions contained in Dassault Service
Bulletin F2000166, Revision 1, dated October 24, 2001 (Modification M1579).
(3) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Dassault Service Bulletins F2000298, Revision 1,
dated October 31, 2006, or Revision 2, dated April 12, 2007; and
F2000166 dated June 27, 2001; are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions of this AD.
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM116, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 980573356; telephone
(425) 2271137; fax (425) 2271149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAAapproved. Corrective actions are considered
FAAapproved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120 0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 20070016, dated January 12, 2007; and Dassault Service
Bulletins F2000166, Revision 1, dated October 24, 2001; and F2000
298, Revision 3, dated September 26, 2007; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 3, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E84999 Filed 31208; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 980573356; telephone (425) 2271137; fax (425) 2271149.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522