The regulations in Sec. 301.893(g) describe the boundaries of the regulated areas in Arizona, California, and Texas. In this interim rule, we are amending Sec. 301.893(g) by removing certain areas or fields in Baylor, Knox, Throckmorton, and Young Counties, TX, from the list of regulated areas, based on our determination that these fields or areas are eligible for release from regulation under the criteria in Sec. 301.893(f). This action relieves restrictions on fields within those areas that are no longer necessary. With this action, there are no longer any regulated areas in Baylor or Knox Counties, TX, and the size of the regulated areas in each of the two remaining regulated Texas counties is reduced.

Immediate Action

Immediate action is warranted to relieve restrictions that are no longer necessary. Under these circumstances, the Administrator has determined that prior notice and opportunity for public comment are contrary to the public interest and that there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553 for making this action effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

We will consider comments we receive during the comment period for this interim rule (see DATES above). After the comment period closes, we will publish another document in the Federal Register. The document will include a discussion of any comments we receive and any amendments we are making to the rule.

Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review under Executive Order 12866.

This rule modifies the Karnal bunt regulations by removing certain areas in
[[Page 18702]]
Texas from quarantine based on surveys that indicate the areas meet our criteria for release from regulation. In Texas, four counties will be affected by this change and a total of 37,012.25 acres will be removed from quarantine. The following table presents the acreage and number of fields removed from regulation by this rule:
Table 1.Location, Acreage, and Number of Fields To Be Released From Regulation, by County
Number of County acres Number of released fields Baylor.......................................... 20,404.13 281 Knox............................................ 11,522.39 117 Throckmorton.................................... 4,040.25 43 Young........................................... 1,045.48 18

In both Throckmorton and Young counties there will still be portions that remain under quarantine for Karnal bunt. Additionally, the quarantine boundaries will remain the same in California and Arizona. In the areas released from regulation for Karnal bunt, producers and other entities will no longer have to meet the restrictions that apply to regulated articles moved from quarantined areas.

The affect of this rule will be to allow affected landowners and businesses in the previously quarantined areas to resume normal operations since the areas have met the criteria for removal from quarantine. The U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA) size standard for wheat farming is $750,000 or less in annual receipts.\1\ We believe the majority of affected entities will be small by SBA standards. There were a total of 230,000 farms, including wheat farms, in the State of Texas in 2006. Of the 230,000 farms, only 3,900 (1.7 percent) had sales of $500,000 or more.\2\ Statewide, a total of 5.5 million allpurpose acres were planted with wheat in 2006, with most of it not harvested but used as forage.\3\ Of the 1.4 million wheat acres that were harvested, there was an average yield of 24 bushels per acre, for a total production of 33.6 million bushels.\4\ The average price for wheat in 2006 was $4.55/bushel, for a total value of production of over $152.8 million in Texas. In 2002, the most recent year of the Census of Agriculture, there were a total of 9,031 farms that harvested wheat for grain in Texas. Of those, the Census of Agriculture recorded that there were 342 wheat farms located in the four counties that will be affected by the interim rule.\5\
\1\ Table of Size Standards based on NAICS 2002 [Wheat farming: NAICS code 111140]. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business
Administration, effective October 1, 2007.
\2\ USDANASS, Quick Stats: U.S. & All States DataFarm Numbers, Texas Data: Farm Numbers by Economic Sales Classes. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
\3\ Wheat is planted for forage, grain, or a combination of the two.
\4\ USDANASS, Texas State Agriculture Overview2006.
Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
\5\ USDANASS, 2002 Census of AgricultureTexas County Data, Table 24. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.

This interim rule will allow producers in the deregulated area to freely move harvested wheat. As a result, it is possible that these producers may have a broader sales base and increased marketing opportunities than prior to the implementation of the interim rule as they will be able to reacquire domestic and international markets that may have been closed to them because of the quarantine. In addition, the possibility of enhanced buyer perceptions that the wheat is of higher quality than when the area was under quarantine may translate into higher prices received. That said, the benefits of this rule are still expected to be small for each producer. The requirement to test grain for Karnal bunt, a prerequisite of movement from a regulated area, is already performed free of charge. Removal of these areas from quarantine represents more the eliminating of the inconvenience of testing rather than a large financial gain.

It is important to note that the effects of this rule, although beneficial, will not result in a significant impact on the domestic market for wheat. As stated earlier, Texas wheat production in 2006 totaled 33.6 million bushels, with the value of production totaling over $152.8 million. For that same year, U.S. wheat production totaled over 1.8 billion bushels, with the value of production over $7.7 billion dollars.\6\ Therefore, Texas represented only 1.86 percent of total U.S. wheat production, and contributed 1.98 percent to the value of U.S. wheat production. Wheat production in the affected counties is a small fraction of the Texas total, and any benefits of the interim rule experienced by affected producers will not have an impact on the price for wheat.
\6\ USDANASS, Quick Stats. Washington, DC: National

Agricultural Statistics Service.

To further illustrate the point, in 2002 Texas production of wheat for grain totaled over 75.1 million bushels. In the four counties that are affected by this rule, production of wheat for grain totaled about 3.8 million bushels, representing approximately a 5 percent share of the State total. The 2002 percentage share of total U.S. wheat production for the counties of Baylor, Knox, Throckmorton, and Young, combined, was limited to 0.24 percent.\7\ The interim rule will not have an impact on the domestic market for wheat. Table 2 presents the wheat production data in 2002 for the four counties affected by the interim rule.
\7\ U.S. production of harvested wheat for grain in 2002 totaled over 1.5 billion bushels. USDANASS, 2002 Census of Agriculture U.S. State Data, Table 23. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
Table 2.Farm Production Data of Harvested Wheat for Grain for the Four Affected Counties, 2002
Number of Bushels County farms harvested Baylor.......................................... 68 636,391 Knox............................................ 150 2,195,982 Throckmorton.................................... 59 694,079 Young........................................... 65 309,121

Total....................................... 342 3,835,573 Source: USDANASS, 2002 Census of AgricultureTexas County Data, Table 24. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.

Wheat producers will not be the only entities to benefit from the quarantine removal. The quarantine regulations require that all conveyances, mechanized harvesting equipment, seed conditioning equipment, grain elevators, and structures used for storing and handling wheat, durum wheat, or triticale be cleaned by removing all soil and plant debris. If disinfection is required by an inspector in addition to cleaning, the articles must be disinfected by one of the methods specified in Sec. 301.8912 of the regulations. As with the affected wheat producers, we expect that most if not all of the independent operators of harvesting equipment and other service providers that operate in the areas removed from quarantine by this rule are small entities.\8\ They will benefit, but the financial gains for them are not expected to be significant.
\8\ These entities are covered under NAICS subsector code 115 Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry, where the SBA size standard is $6.5 million or less in annual receipts.

Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 18703]]

Executive Order 12372

This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)

Executive Order 12988

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule. Paperwork Reduction Act

This interim rule contains no information collection or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301

Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 301 as follows:
PART 301DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 77017772 and 77817786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.

Section 301.7515 issued under Sec. 204, Title II, Public Law 106113, 113 Stat. 1501A293; sections 301.7515 and 301.7516 issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law 106224, 114 Stat. 400 (7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
2. In Sec. 30189.3, paragraph (g) is amended under the heading ``Texas'' by removing the entries for Baylor County and Knox County and by revising the entries for Throckmorton County and Young County to read as follows:
Sec. 301.893 Regulated areas.
* * * * *
(g) * * *

Texas

Throckmorton County. Beginning in the northeastern portion of the county at the line of longitude 98.9921[deg] W and the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N; then south along the line of longitude 98.9921[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.2055[deg] N; then east along the line of latitude 33.2055[deg] N to the line of longitude 98.9891[deg] W; then south along the line of longitude 98.9891[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.1809[deg] N; then east along the line of latitude 33.1809[deg] N to the Throckmorton/Young County line at the line of longitude 98.9527[deg] W; then north along the line of longitude 98.9527[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N; then west along the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N to the point of beginning.

Young County. Beginning in the northwestern portion of the county at the line of longitude 98.9527[deg] W and the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N; then south along the line of longitude 98.9527[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.1809[deg] N; then east along the line of latitude 33.1809[deg] N to the line of longitude 98.8762[deg] W; then north along the line of longitude 98.8762[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.1946[deg] N; then east along the line of latitude 33.1946[deg] N to the line of longitude 98.8356[deg] W; then north along the line of longitude 98.8356[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.2880[deg] N; then west along the line of latitude 33.2880[deg] N to the line of longitude 98.9430[deg] W; then south along the line of longitude 98.9430[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N; then west along the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N to the point of beginning.

Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of April 2008. Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E87194 Filed 4408; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 341034P

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Dr. Matthew H. Royer, Associate Director, Emergency and Domestic Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 26, Riverdale, MD 207371236; (301) 7347819.