Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FAA-2007-29240; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-076-AD]
RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Models 175 and 175A Airplanes
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) Models 175 and 175A airplanes. This proposed AD would require you to check the airplane logbook to determine if the original engine mounting brackets have been replaced. If the original engine mounting brackets are still installed, this proposed AD would require you to repetitively inspect those brackets for cracks and replace any cracked engine mounting bracket. After replacing all four original engine mounting brackets, no further action would be required by this proposed AD. This proposed AD was prompted by a report that the engine became detached from the firewall during landing on one of the affected airplanes. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the engine mounting brackets, which could result in failure of the engine mounting bracket. This failure could lead to the engine detaching from the firewall.
SUMMARY: Cessna Aircraft Company Models 175 and 175A Airplanes,
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, ``FAA 200729240; Directorate Identifier 2007CE076AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive concerning this proposed AD.
We received a report of the engine detaching from the firewall on a Cessna Model 175 airplane during landing. Investigation revealed that cracks in the two top engine mounting brackets behind the firewall caused the brackets to fail. This resulted in the top half of the firewall failing, pulling forward and down about 18 inches.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Materials Laboratory examined the cracked brackets. The examination revealed that the metal content of the brackets did not contain the constituent elements of the specified material and was approximately 40 percent below the specified strength. The NTSB determined that reduced structural integrity of the engine mounting brackets resulted in fatigue cracks developing in the brackets.
We agree with the NTSB's determination that inadequate materials
used in manufacturing the engine mounting brackets, which were used on [[Page 19018]]
Cessna Models 175 and 175A airplanes manufactured from 1958 through 1960, caused the engine mounting brackets to crack.
This condition, if not corrected, could cause the engine mounting brackets to fail. This failure could result in the engine detaching from the firewall.
We have reviewed Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SEB072,
Revision 2, dated June 18, 2007. The service information describes procedures for:
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD would require you to check the airplane logbook to determine if the original engine mounting brackets have been replaced. If the original engine mounting brackets are still installed, this proposed AD would require you to repetitively inspect those brackets for cracks and replace any cracked engine mounting bracket. After replacing all four original engine mounting brackets, no further action would be required by this proposed AD. This proposed AD would require you to use the service information described previously to perform these actions. Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 1,218 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to do each proposed inspection: Total cost per Total cost on Labor cost Parts cost airplane U.S. operators 7.5 workhours x $80 per hour = $600......... Not applicable................. $600 $730,800
We estimate the following costs to do the proposed replacements. Total cost per Labor cost Parts cost airplane 3 workhours per bracket x $80 $200 per bracket. $440 per bracket. per hour = $240 per bracket. 4 4 x $200 = $800 $1,760 to replace brackets per airplane x $240 for all 4 all 4 brackets. per bracket = $960. brackets.
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone (800) 6475527) is located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Cessna Aircraft Company: Docket No. FAA200729240; Directorate Identifier 2007CE076AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by June 9, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the following airplane models and serial numbers that are certificated in any category:
[[Page 19019]]
Model Serial Nos. Year manufactured
(1) 175................................. 55001 through 55703............. 1958.
(2) 175................................. 55704 through 56238............. 1959.
(3) 175................................. 28700A, 626, and 640............ 1958 and 1959.
(4) 175A................................ 691, and 56239 through 56777.... 1960. Unsafe Condition
(d) A report that the engine became unattached from the firewall
during landing on one of the affected airplanes prompts this AD. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the engine
mounting brackets, which could result in failure of the engine
mounting bracket. This failure could lead to the engine detaching from the firewall.
Compliance
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless already done:
Actions Compliance Procedures
(1) Check the airplane logbook to Within the next 30 days The owner/operator holding at least a
determine if all four of the original after the effective date private pilot certificate as authorized
engine mounting brackets have been of this AD. by section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation
replaced. Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may do this
action.
(2) If you can positively determine that Not applicable............. Make an entry into the aircraft logbook
all four of the original engine mounting showing compliance with this portion of
brackets have been replaced, no further the AD in accordance with section 43.9
action is required. of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 43.9). The owner/operator holding
at least a private pilot certificate as
authorized by section 43.7 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
43.7) may do this action.
(3) If you cannot positively determine Initially inspect within Follow Cessna Single Engine Service
that all four of the original engine the next 12 months after Bulletin SEB072, Revision 2, dated
mounting brackets have been replaced, the effective date of this June 18, 2007.
inspect each of the upper and lower AD. If no cracks are
engine mounting brackets on both the found, repetitively
left and right sides for cracks as inspect thereafter at
specified in the service bulletin. intervals not to exceed
500 hours timeinservice
(TIS) until all four of
the original engine
mounting brackets are replaced.
(4) If cracks are found in any of the Before further flight after Follow Cessna Single Engine Service
engine mounting brackets during any the inspection in which Bulletin SEB072, Revision 2, dated
inspection required in paragraph (e)(3) cracks are found. June 18, 2007.
of this AD, replace the cracked engine Replacing the cracked
mounting bracket(s). engine mounting bracket
terminates the repetitive
inspection required in
paragraph (e)(3) of this
AD only for the replaced
engine mounting bracket.
(5) To terminate the repetitive At any time before or after Follow Cessna Single Engine Service
inspections required in paragraph (e)(3) the initial inspection Bulletin SEB072, Revision 2, dated
of this AD, you may replace all four required in paragraph June 18, 2007.
original engine mounting brackets. (e)(3) of this AD.
(6) Dispose of every replaced bracket Before further flight after Not applicable.
following 14 CFR 43.10, paragraph the engine mounting
(c)(6), which states the following: bracket is removed for ``Mutilation. The part may be mutilated replacement.
to deter its installation in a type
certificated product. The mutilation
must render the part beyond repair and
incapable of being reworked to appear to
be airworthy.''
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(f) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Gary Park, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: 3169464123; fax: 3169464107; e mail address: gary.park@faa.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76