Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FAA-2008-0031; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-313-AD; Amendment 39-15484; AD 2008-09-04]
RIN ID: RIN 2120-AA64
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8-31, DC-8- 32, DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-8-43 Airplanes; Model DC-8-50 Series Airplanes; Model DC-8F-54 and DC-8F-55 Airplanes; Model DC-8-60 Series Airplanes; Model DC-8-60F Series Airplanes; Model DC-8-70 Series Airplanes; and Model DC-8-70F Series Airplanes
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 27, 2008.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all McDonnell Douglas airplanes identified above. This AD requires revising the FAAapproved maintenance program to incorporate new airworthiness limitations for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements. This AD results from a design review of the fuel tank systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
SUMMARY: McDonnell Douglas Model DC 8 31, DC 8 32, DC 8 33, DC 8 41, DC 8 42, and DC 8 43 Airplanes, etc.,
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC831, DC832, DC833, DC841, DC8 42, and DC843 airplanes; Model DC850 series airplanes; Model DC8F 54 and DC8F55 airplanes; Model DC860 series airplanes; Model DC8 60F series airplanes; Model DC870 series airplanes; and Model DC8 70F series airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2008 (73 FR 3419). That NPRM proposed to require revising the FAAapproved maintenance program to incorporate new airworthiness limitations for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements.
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We considered the comments received from the one commenter, Boeing.
For standardization purposes, we have revised this AD in the following ways:
Boeing requests that we revise Note 1 of the NPRM to clarify that deviations from the AWLs specified in Report MDC02K9030, should be approved as an AMOC according to paragraph (h) of the NPRM. Boeing states that Note 1 of the NPRM might be interpreted to mean that the Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) specified in Report MDC02K9030 must be revised to reflect modifications, alterations, or repairs that are initiated by an operator and outside of Boeing's design cognizance and responsibility. Boeing requests that we revise Note 1 as follows:
As stated previously, we have simplified the language in Note 1 of this AD for standardization with other similar ADs. The language the commenter requests we change does not appear in the revised note; therefore, no additional change to this AD is necessary in this regard. Request To Clarify Approval of Component Maintenance Manual (CMM) Changes
Boeing requests that we revise the heading and certain wording for
the ``Changes to Component Maintenance Manuals (CMMs) Cited in Fuel
Tank System AWLs'' section of the NPRM. Boeing believes that section
was intended to address situations where an operator chooses to deviate
from the procedures in the CMM referenced in Report MDC02K9030. Boeing
states that its proposed changes are intended to clarify that only
deviations proposed by an operator require approval of the Manager, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA. Boeing further states that
wording in the NPRM could be interpreted to mean that approval of a CMM
in its entirety, including any future CMM revisions by Boeing, would
require direct approval of the Manager, Los Angeles, ACO, or governing
regulatory authority. Specifically, Boeing requests that we revise that section as follows:
We agree that clarification is necessary. Our intent is that any deviation from the CMMs as defined in Report MDC02K9030 must be approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, or the governing regulatory authority, before those deviations can be used. However, we have not changed the AD as suggested by the commenter, since the ``Changes to Component Maintenance Manuals (CMMs) Cited in Fuel Tank System AWLs'' section of the NPRM is not retained in this final rule.
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed with the changes described previously. We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
We estimate that this AD affects 125 airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it takes about 1 workhour per product to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per workhour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to U.S. operators to be $10,000, or $80 per product.
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on
[[Page 21525]]
products identified in this rulemaking action.
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
20080904 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 3915484. Docket No. FAA 20080031; Directorate Identifier 2007NM313AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective May 27, 2008. Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC831, DC 832, DC833, DC841, DC842, and DC843 airplanes; Model DC8
51, DC852, DC853, and DC855 airplanes; Model DC8F54 and DC
8F55 airplanes; Model DC861, DC862, and DC863 airplanes;
Model DC861F, DC862F, and DC863F airplanes; Model DC871, DC
872, and DC873 airplanes; and Model DC871F, DC872F, and DC8 73F airplanes; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with paragraph (i) of this AD. The request should include
a description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure the continued operational safety of the airplane.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a design review of the fuel tank
systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for
ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures,
alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.
Revise the FAAApproved Maintenance Program
(f) Before December 16, 2008, revise the FAAapproved
maintenance program to incorporate the information specified in
Appendixes B, C, and D of the Boeing DC8 Special Compliance Item
Report, MDC02K9030, Revision A, dated August 8, 2006. Accomplishing
the revision in accordance with a later revision of the Boeing DC8
Special Compliance Item Report, MDC02K9030, is an acceptable method
of compliance if the revision is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.
No Reporting Requirement
(g) Although the Boeing DC8 Special Compliance Item Report,
MDC02K9030, Revision A, dated August 8, 2006, specifies to submit
certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not require that action.
No Alternative Inspections, Inspection Intervals, or Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs)
(h) After accomplishing the applicable actions specified in
paragraph (f) of this AD, no alternative inspections, inspection
intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the inspections, intervals,
or CDCCLs are part of a later revision of Boeing DC8 Special
Compliance Item Report, MDC02K9030, Revision A, dated August 8,
2006, that is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO; or unless
the inspections, intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
AMOCs
(i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA, ATTN: Samuel Lee,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM140L, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California 907124137; telephone (562) 627
5262; fax (562) 6275210; has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Boeing DC8 Special Compliance Item Report,
MDC02K9030, Revision A, dated August 8, 2006, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (The
revision date for this document is identified only on the title page
and in the ``Index of Page Changes'' section of the document.) This document contains the following effective pages:
Pages Revision Date
Index of Page Changes Pages A............... August 8, 2006. i through iii.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1L5A (D8000024).
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 2027416030, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_ regulations/ibr_locations.html.
[[Page 21526]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 4, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E88532 Filed 42108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491013P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Samuel Lee, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 907124137; telephone (562) 6275262; fax (562) 6275210.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522