Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [CG Docket No. 03-123; DA 08-478]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Clarifies the Eligibility Requirement for Compensation From the Interstate Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Fund for Providers of Internet Protocol Captioned Telephone Service
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: In this document, the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau (Bureau) clarifies the eligibility requirement for compensation from the TRS Fund (Fund) for providers of Internet Protocol (IP) captioned telephone service (IP CTS). The Bureau also clarifies that an IP CTS provider seeking compensation from the Fund must notify the Interstate TRS Fund administrator 30 days prior to the date the provider submits minutes for payment.
SUMMARY: Compensation From Interstate Telecommunications Relay Service Fund for IP CTS Providers,
On January 11, 2007, the Commission released Telecommunications
Relay Services and SpeechtoSpeech Services for Individuals with
Hearing and Speech Disabilities; Internetbased Captioned Telephone
Service, CG Docket No. 03123, Declaratory Ruling, 22 FCC Rcd 379 (IP
CTS Declaratory Ruling), published at 72 FR 6960, February 14, 2007. In
the IP CTS Declaratory Ruling, the Commission recognized IP CTS as a
form of TRS eligible for compensation from the Fund. Because the Bureau
has received questions concerning the manner in which IP CTS providers may be eligible for compensation from the
[[Page 23362]]
The Commission's eligibility rules set forth in 47 CFR
64.604(c)(5)(iii)(F) provide that TRS providers eligible for receiving payments from the Interstate TRS Fund must be:
(1) TRS facilities operated under contract with and/or by certified
state TRS programs pursuant to section 64.605 of the Commission's rules; or
(2) TRS facilities owned by or operated under contract with a
common carrier providing interstate services operated pursuant to section 64.604 of the Commission's rules; or
(3) Interstate common carriers offering TRS pursuant to section 64.604 of the Commission's rules; or
(4) Video Relay Service (VRS)[, * * *] Internet Protocol (IP) Relay
* * *[, and IP CTS] providers certified by the Commission pursuant to section 64.605 of the Commission's rules.
The fourth eligibility criterioncertification by the Commission was adopted in Telecommunications Relay Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, CG Docket No. 03123, Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 20577 (2005) (2005 IP Relay/ VRS Certification Order), published at 71 FR 2942, January 18, 2006. Prior to that time, there was no federal certification process for relay providers seeking compensation from the Fund; the regulations provided only for the certification of state TRS programs. See generally Telecommunications Relay Services and SpeechtoSpeech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, CC Docket Nos. 90571 and 9867, CG Docket No. 03123, Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, (2004 TRS Report and Order), 19 FCC Rcd 12475, 12516, paragraph 99 (2004), published at 69 FR 53346 and 69 FR 53382, September 1, 2004.
The Commission has interpreted the third eligibility criterionan interstate common carrier offering TRS pursuant to section 64.604to apply only to common carriers ``offering telephone voice transmission services that are obligated to provide TRS in a state that does not have a certified TRS program.'' 2004 TRS Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 12517, paragraph 103, note 304. As the Commission explained in the 2005 IP Relay/VRS Certification Order:
The third eligibility category``Interstate common carriers offering TRS pursuant to Sec. 64.604''has been the means by which some entities that are not voice telephone service providers have sought to offer VRS, and not the other forms of TRS, and be compensated for doing so from the Interstate TRS Fund. The Commission previously construed [in the 2004 TRS Report and Order] the third eligibility prong, however, as applying to common carriers obligated to provide TRS in a state that does not have a certified program. Because we now adopt a fourth eligibility criterion, which will allow common carriers seeking to offer VRS or IP Relay and receive compensation to do so without being part of a certified state program or contracting with an entity that is, it is not necessary at this time to revisit this construction of the third eligibility category. 2005 IP Relay/VRS Certification Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 20587, paragraph 18.
Against this background, in the IP CTS Declaratory Ruling, the Commission expressly addressed the manner in which IP CTS providers may be eligible for compensation from the Fund. The Commission concluded that ``an entity desiring to provide IP captioned telephone service * * * may choose to seek certification from the Commission under [Sec. 64.605],'' and that therefore, ``[a]s a general matter, potential IP CTS providers may become eligible for compensation from the Fund by being accepted into a certified state TRS program or subcontracting with an entity that is part of a certified state program, or by seeking Commission certification.'' IP CTS Declaratory Ruling, 22 FCC Rcd at 391, paragraph 28. The Commission made clear that ``[p]resent eligibility to receive compensation from the Fund for the provision of other forms of TRS (including captioned telephone service) does not confer eligibility with regard to the provision of the IP CTS recognized in this Declaratory Ruling.''
The Bureau therefore clarifies that, to establish eligibility for compensation from the Fund, IP CTS providers must either: (1) Seek certification from the Commission pursuant to 47 CFR 64.605; (2) become part of a certified state program; or (3) subcontract with an entity that is part of a certified state program. Only where an IP CTS provider is a common carrier offering telephone voice transmission services and obligated to provide IP CTS in a state that does not have a certified TRS program would it be able to establish eligibility for compensation from the Fund via section 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(F)(3) of the Commission's rules. Further, the fact that a provider is eligible to receive compensation from the Fund for the provision of other forms of TRS is not sufficient grounds, on its own, to establish a provider's eligibility to receive compensation from the Fund for the provision of IP CTS. The intent of the more specific eligibility rules for IP CTS providers set forth in the IP CTS Declaratory Ruling is to ensure that either the Commission or a state has oversight responsibility for each provider.
The Bureau also clarifies that IP CTS providers seeking
compensation from the Fund must notify the Fund administrator
(currently, the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA)) 30 days
prior to the date they submit minutes to the Fund administrator for
payment. 47 CFR 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(G). This requirement applies even if
the provider presently offers other forms of TRS and is compensated
from the Fund. Because the 2007 IP CTS Declaratory Ruling specifically
states that merely being a relay provider of another service is not
enough to confer eligibility, it follows that for IP CTS providers to
become eligible for compensation, they must both seek Commission or
state certification (or be a subcontractor), and must notify NECA 30 days prior to submitting minutes for payment.
Federal Communications Commission.
Nicole McGinnis,
Deputy Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau.
[FR Doc. E89522 Filed 42908; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 671201P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Thomas Chandler, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office at (202) 4181475 (voice), (202) 4180597 (TTY), or email at Thomas.Chandler@fcc.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522