Federal Register: May 9, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 91)
DOCID: fr09my08-20 FR Doc E8-10443
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
CFR Citation: 10 CFR Part 50
NRC ID: [NRC-2008-0237]
NOTICE: PROPOSED RULES
DOCID: fr09my08-20
DOCUMENT ACTION: Issuance of draft policy statement and notice of opportunity for public comment.
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
Regulation of Advanced Nuclear Power Plants; Draft Statement of Policy
DATES: Comments on this document should be submitted by July 8, 2008. Comments received after that date will be considered to the extent practical. To ensure efficient and complete comment resolution, comments should include references to the section, page, and line numbers of the document to which the comment applies, if possible.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
adopting a statement of policy to improve the licensing environment for
advanced nuclear power reactors to minimize complexity and uncertainty
in the regulatory process. This statement would provide the Commission's policy regarding the review of, and desired
characteristics associated with, advanced reactors. This policy
statement would be the second revision of the policy statement titled
``Regulation of Advanced Nuclear Power Plants; Statement of Policy.''
The purpose of this revision is to update the Commission's policy
statement on advanced reactors to integrate the Commission's
expectations for security and preparedness with the current
expectations for safety. This draft policy statement is being issued
for public comment.
SUMMARY:
Regulation of Advanced Nuclear Power Plants; Draft Statement of Policy,
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Background
On July 8, 1986 (51 FR 24643), the Commission published a policy
statement on regulation of advanced reactors in the Federal Register.
The Commission's primary objectives in issuing the advanced reactor policy statement were as follows:
On July 12, 1994 (59 FR 35461), the Commission revised the 1986 advanced reactor policy statement by addressing the Commission's policy on metrication (57 FR 46202; October 7, 1992; as revised June 19, 1996 (61 FR 31169)).
Since the events of September 11, 2001, the NRC has assessed potential threats and their possible impacts on the Nation's fleet of operating nuclear power reactors and has required upgrades of physical security measures and mitigative strategies through the issuance of a series of security orders and license conditions. For new nuclear power reactors, the Commission considers it prudent to provide expectations and guidance on security matters to prospective applicants so that they can use this information early in the design stage to identify potential mitigative measures and/or design features that provide a more robust and effective security posture. Therefore, the Commission decided to revise the advanced reactor policy statement to integrate these expectations for security and preparedness with the current expectations for safety.
The NRC is seeking public comment in order to receive feedback from the widest range of interested parties and to ensure that all information relevant to developing this document is available to the NRC staff. This document is issued for comment only. The NRC will review public comments received on the document, incorporate suggested changes as necessary, and issue the final revision.
Commission Policy
Consistent with its legislative mandate, the Commission's policy with respect to regulating nuclear power reactors is to ensure adequate protection of the environment and public health and safety and common defense and security. Regarding advanced reactors, the Commission expects, as a minimum, at least the same degree of protection of the environment and public health and safety and the common defense and security, that is required for currentgeneration lightwater reactors. Furthermore, the Commission expects that advanced reactors will provide enhanced margins of safety and/or use simplified, inherent, passive, or other innovative means to accomplish their safety and security functions.
The Commission's expectation for advanced reactor designs that consider the effects of a large, commercial airplane impact is currently being addressed through rulemaking (Consideration of Aircraft Impacts for New Nuclear Power Reactor DesignsRIN AI19ID Docket NRC 20070009). The Commission believes that reactors designed with potential aircraft impact considerations resulting from this rule would be more robust than if they were designed in the absence of this rule.
Among the attributes that could assist in establishing the acceptability or licensability of a proposed advanced reactor design, and therefore should be considered in advanced designs, are:
If specific advanced reactor designs with some or all of the
previously mentioned attributes are brought to the NRC for comment and/
or evaluation, the Commission can develop preliminary design safety
evaluation and licensing criteria for their safetyrelated and
securityrelated aspects. Incorporating the above attributes may
promote more efficient and effective design reviews. However, the
listing of a particular attribute does not necessarily mean that specific licensing criteria will attach to
[[Page 26351]]
that attribute. Designs with some or all of these attributes are also
likely to be more readily understood by the general public. Indeed, the
number and nature of the regulatory requirements may depend on the
extent to which an individual advanced reactor design incorporates general attributes such as those listed previously.
In addition, the Commission expects that the safety features of these advanced reactor designs will be complemented by the operational program for Emergency Planning (EP). This EP operational program, in turn, must be demonstrated by inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria to ensure effective implementation of established measures. The Commission also expects that advanced reactor designs will comply with the Commission's safety goal policy statement (51 FR 28044; August 4, 1986 as corrected and republished at 51 FR 30028; August 21, 1986), and the policy statement on conversion to the metric measurement system (61 FR 31169; June 19, 1996).
To provide for more timely and effective regulation of advanced reactors, the Commission encourages the earliest possible interaction of applicants, vendors, other government agencies, and the NRC to provide for early identification of regulatory requirements for advanced reactors and to provide all interested parties, including the public, with a timely, independent assessment of the safety and security characteristics of advanced reactor designs. Such licensing interaction and guidance early in the design process will contribute towards minimizing complexity and adding stability and predictability in the licensing and regulation of advanced reactors.
While the NRC does not develop new designs, the Commission intends to develop the capability, when appropriate, for timely assessment and response to innovative and advanced designs that might be presented for NRC review. Prior experience has shown that new reactor designseven variations of established designsmay involve technical problems that must be solved to ensure adequate protection of the public health and safety. The earlier these design problems are identified, the earlier satisfactory resolution can be achieved. Prospective applicants are reminded that, while the NRC will undertake to review and comment on new design concepts, the applicants are responsible for documentation and research necessary to support a specific application. Research activities would include testing of new safety or security features that differ from existing designs for operating reactors, or that use simplified, inherent, passive means to accomplish their safety or security function. The testing shall ensure that these new features will perform as predicted, provide collection of sufficient data to validate computer codes, and show that the effects of system interactions are acceptable.
During the initial phase of advanced reactor development, the Commission particularly encourages design innovations that enhance safety, reliability, and security (such as those described previously) and that generally depend on technology that is either proven or can be demonstrated by a straightforward technology development program. In the absence of a significant history of operating experience on an advanced concept reactor, plans for innovative use of proven technology and/or new technology development programs should be presented to the NRC for review as early as possible, so that the NRC can assess how the proposed program might influence regulatory requirements.
Finally, the NRC also believes that it will be in the interest of the public as well as the design vendors' and the prospective license applicants to address security issues early in the design stage to achieve a more robust and effective security posture for future nuclear power reactors.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of May 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Annette L. ViettiCook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E810443 Filed 5808; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 759001P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Wesley H. Held, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 0001, Telephone: 3014151583, email: Wesley.Held@nrc.gov.