Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FR-5160-P-01]
RIN ID: RIN 2502-AI56
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Federal Housing Administration: Acceptable Payment History for Late Request for Endorsement of Mortgage for Insurance
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: HUD's current regulations require that a mortgage show an acceptable payment history when submitted for late endorsement, but they are silent as to what constitutes an acceptable payment history. This proposed rule would provide factors that establish an acceptable payment history when a mortgage is submitted for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insurance more than 60 days after closing, and would make one technical amendment pertaining to the submission of documentation for endorsement.
SUMMARY: Housing and Urban Development Department,
Current HUD regulations at 24 CFR 203.255(c)(7) provide that when a mortgage is submitted for insurance more than 60 days after closing, it must show an acceptable payment history as part of the preendorsement review conducted by HUD. Although HUD may determine on a casebycase basis what constitutes an acceptable payment history, such a procedure is time consuming and inefficient. In the recent past, HUD has issued more general guidance for determining an acceptable payment history on two occasions. Mortgagee Letter 200414, issued April 12, 2004, provided for the submission of a payment history or ledger, as well as a certification that:
1. All mortgage payments due have been made by the mortgagor prior to or within the month due. If any payments have been made after the month due, the loan is not eligible for endorsement until six consecutive payments have been made prior to and/or within the calendar month due, and;
2. All escrow accounts for taxes, hazard insurance, and mortgage insurance premiums are current and intact, except for disbursements that may have been made to cover payments for which the accounts were specifically established, and;
3. The mortgage lender did not provide the funds to bring and/or keep the loan current or to bring about the appearance of an acceptable payment history.
Subsequently, on May 17, 2005, HUD issued Mortgagee Letter 200523, which eliminated the submission of the payment history or ledger, as well as the requirement for six consecutive payments. Instead of the payment history or the 6 months of payments, the certification under Mortgagee Letter 200523 included a statement that no mortgage payment is currently unpaid more than 30 days. The second and third factors, however, continued to be included.
Having gained experience with the approaches in each of the cited Mortgagee Letters, HUD has determined that the first factor of Mortgagee Letter 200414, along with the two additional factors included in both Mortgagee Letters, provide an acceptable level of assurance that a mortgage for which a late endorsement is requested shows an acceptable payment history. The record of six consecutive payments as evidence of an acceptable payment history had been a longstanding HUD policy before the issuance of Mortgagee Letter 2005 23, which instead provided the alternative of an assurance that the loan was current at the time it was submitted for FHA's insurance endorsement. HUD considers it appropriate to return to its earlier, more rigorous longstanding policy, particularly at time of increased defaults and of concerns over the toopermissive lending practices associated with these increases. A more rigorous policy is expected to result in a lower level of default and claims on loans submitted to FHA for late endorsement. Accordingly, HUD, in this rule, is proposing to include the three factors of Mortgagee Letter 200414 in its regulations at 24 CFR 203.255(c)(7). In doing so, HUD will provide clarity and certainty as to which mortgages qualify for late endorsement when submitted more than 60 days after closing. Paperwork approval is concurrently being sought for the associated ledger and certification requirements. The certification requirements will be provided in Sec. 203.255(b).
To achieve the regulatory changes discussed above, section
203.255(c) would be amended to designate the introductory paragraph as
paragraph (c)(1) and revise existing paragraph (c)(7) as (c)(1)(vii),
to include the three factors as paragraphs (A) through (C).\1\ The
current, undesignated, second paragraph in Sec. 203.255(c)(7) would be
designated as Sec. 203.255(c)(2). As noted above, HUD would also amend Sec. 203.255(b) to include the certification
[[Page 32633]]
requirement. In addition to these changes, HUD would make a technical
amendment. Newly designated paragraph (c)(2) would be revised to remove
the erroneous indication that a false or fraudulent certification can
be corrected and resubmitted in a way that would then make the mortgage
eligible for endorsement. Certifications are subject to statutory
requirements and penalties that the existing language in this regulation could not supersede.
\1\ On September 5, 2007, HUD announced FHASecure, an initiative
that allows families with strong credit histories who had been
making timely payments on their nonFHAinsured mortgages before a
loan interest rate resetbut are now in defaultto qualify for
refinancing with FHA mortgage insurance. The proposed acceptable
payment history standards would apply to the FHAinsured mortgage
used to refinance the debt, but would not apply to the nonFHA
insured mortgage being refinanced. Therefore, this proposed rule
does not affect the eligibility of a family that otherwise meets the
eligibility criteria, but is in default on their mortgage, from
participating in FHASecure. A copy of Mortgagee Letter 200711,
which announced FHASecure, may be downloaded at: http:// portal.hud.gov/fha/reference/ml2007/0711ml.doc.
III. Findings and Certifications
The information collection requirements contained in this proposed rule have been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35013520). In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number. Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding the information collection requirements in this proposed rule. Comments must be received within 60 days from the date of this proposed rule.
The burden of the information collections resulting from this proposed rule is estimated as follows:
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Estimated
Number of average time Estimated
Description of information collection Number of responses per for annual burden
parties respondent requirement (in hours)
(in hours)
Payment History/Ledger.......................... 8,700 13 .10 11,310
Lender Certification............................ 8,700 13 .50 56,550
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), HUD is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected agencies concerning this collection of information to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding the
information collection requirements in this rule. Comments must refer
to the proposal by name and docket number (FR5160P01) and must be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503,
Fax number: (202) 3956974
and
Reports Liaison Officer,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for HousingFederal Housing Commissioner,
Department of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 204108000.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule would provide factors for determining what constitutes an acceptable payment history for the purpose of late endorsement of a mortgage. The rule would not impose any additional burden on entities or individuals, but only examines compliance, over a limited period of time, with obligations that individuals have agreed to assume in exchange for a benefit. Accordingly, the undersigned certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Notwithstanding HUD's determination that this rule will not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities, HUD specifically invites comments regarding any less burdensome alternatives to this rule that will meet HUD's objectives, as described in this preamble.
A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment has been made, in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 50, which implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). That finding is available for public inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 204100500. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, please schedule an appointment to review the finding by calling the Regulations Division at (202) 7083055 (this is not a tollfree number).
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that has federalism implications, if the rule either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order. This rule will not have federalism implications and would not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 15311538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal governments, and on the private sector. This proposed rule does not impose any federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector, within the meaning of UMRA. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number for FHA mortgage insurance for homes is 14.117.
[[Page 32634]]
Hawaiian natives, Home improvement, Indianslands, Loan Programs housing and community development, Mortgage insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Solar energy.
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the preamble, HUD proposes to amend 24 CFR part 203 as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 203 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1709, 1710, 1715b, and 1715u; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
2. In Sec. 203.255 by:
A. Redesignating paragraph (b)(14) as (b)(15),
B. Adding a new paragraph (b)(14),
C. Redesignating paragraph (c) introductory text and paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(7) as paragraph (c)(1) introductory text and paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(vii), respectively,
D. Designating the undesignated paragraph following (c)(7) as paragraph (c)(2), and
E. Revising newly designated paragraph (c)(1)(vii) to read as follows:
Sec. 203.255 Insurance of mortgage.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(14) In the case where a mortgage lender submits a loan for
endorsement more than 60 days after closing as permitted by the
Secretary, a certification to the Secretary that the lender has
complied with the factors identified in Sec. 203.255(c)(1)(vii). (c)(1) * * *
(vii) The mortgage was not in default when submitted for insurance
or, if submitted for insurance more than 60 days after closing, the
mortgage shows an acceptable payment history. A mortgage that meets the following factors shows an acceptable payment history:
(A) All mortgage payments due have been made by the mortgagor prior
to or within the month due. If any payments have been made after the
month due, the loan is not eligible for endorsement until six
consecutive payments have been made prior to or within the calendar month due, and;
(B) All escrow accounts for taxes, hazard insurance, and mortgage
insurance premiums are current and intact, except for disbursements
that may have been made to cover payments for which the accounts were specifically established, and;
(C) The mortgage lender did not provide the funds to bring and/or
keep the loan current or to bring about the appearance of an acceptable payment history.
(2) In addition to the reviews and determinations made in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, the Secretary is authorized to determine if the
mortgage fails to meet a statutory or regulatory requirement. If,
following this review, the mortgage is determined to be eligible, the
Secretary will endorse the mortgage for insurance by issuance of a
Mortgage Insurance Certificate. If the mortgage is determined to be
ineligible, the Secretary will, among other things, inform the
mortgagee in writing of this determination and will include the reasons
for the determination and further inform whether any actions may be
taken to correct the determination of ineligibility for endorsement. * * * * *
Dated: May 12, 2008.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for HousingFederal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. E812813 Filed 6608; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 421067P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Margaret E. Burns, Director, Office of Single Family Program Development, Office of Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 9278, Washington, DC 204108000; telephone number (202) 7082121 (this is not a tollfree number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 8778339.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522