Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FR-5200-C-01A2]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Notice of HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 General Section and FY2008 SuperNOFA for HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs; Correction
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: On March 19, 2008, HUD published its Notice of Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA); Policy Requirements and General Section to HUD's FY2008 NOFAs for Discretionary Programs (General Section). On May 12, 2008, HUD published its FY2008 SuperNOFA, for HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs. This document corrects the hourly rate for consultants as published in the March 19, 2008, General Section. This document also makes corrections or clarifications to the following sections of the May 12, 2008, SuperNOFA: Appendix A of the Introduction to the SuperNOFA, the LeadBased Paint Hazard Control Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program, and Operation Lead Elimination Action Program; the Lead Outreach Grant Program; the Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency Program; the Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency (ROSS) Service Coordinators Program; and the SelfHelp Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). Finally, this notice provides notice to all applicants regarding a technical issue with the Grants.gov SF424 form and provides guidance to address the issue.
SUMMARY: Funding Availability (SuperNOFA) for HUD Discretionary Grant Programs; Correction,
On March 19, 2008 (73 FR 14882), HUD published its General Section. At page 14887, section III.C.4.l., second column, HUD stated that the hourly wage for the equivalent of General Schedule 15, Step 10 base pay rate is $57.90. The correct hourly rate for the equivalent of General Schedule 15, Step 10 base pay rate is actually $59.42.
Accordingly, at page 14887, section III.C.4.l., second column, in the March
[[Page 33447]]
19, 2008, Notice of HUD's FY2008, Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA), Policy Requirements and General Section to the SuperNOFA for
HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs, the following correction is made:
1. Salary Limitation for Consultants. FY2008 funds may not be used to pay or to provide reimbursement for payment of the salary of a consultant, whether retained by the federal government or the grantee, at a rate more than the equivalent of General Schedule 15, Step 10 base pay rate for which the annual rate for FY2008 is $124,010. The hourly rate is $59.42.
On May 12, 2008, HUD published its FY2008 SuperNOFA. Today's publication corrects certain sections of the SuperNOFA. Summaries of the technical corrections made by this document follow. The page number shown in brackets identifies where the individual funding availability announcement that is being corrected can be found in the May 12, 2008, SuperNOFA. The technical correction described in today's Federal Register will also be reflected in the application instructions located on Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants who have submitted their applications prior to this publication can choose to resubmit an updated application that reflects the corrections and clarifications. The last application received and validated by Grants.gov by the deadline date will be the application that is reviewed and rated.
As discussed in this technical correction notice, HUD is moving the
application deadline dates for the Housing Choice Voucher Family Self
Sufficiency and SHOP NOFAs. The new deadline date for the Housing
Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency NOFA will be July 16, 2008. The
new deadline date for the SHOP NOFA will be July 18, 2008. HUD is,
therefore, correcting the entries for the Housing Choice Voucher Family
SelfSufficiency Program and the SHOP NOFAs on Appendix A to reflect these changes.
LeadBased Paint Hazard Control Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and Operation Lead Elimination Action Program [27159]
On page 27161, Section I.B.4., first column, and on page 27168, Section IV.F.2, first column, the deadline date for applicants to request a waiver of the 25 percent match requirement does not match the date posted on Grants.gov. HUD is correcting the deadline date to request a waiver in the SuperNOFA to match that listed on Grants.gov. Lead Outreach Grant Program [27188]
On page 27189, Section II entitled ``Eligibility Information'', third column, HUD inadvertently identified this section as section ``II.'' It should be section ``III.''
On page 27190, section III entitled ``application and submission information'', second column, HUD inadvertently identified this section as section ``iii.'' it should be section ``iv.''
On page 27191, section v.a, third column, HUD incorrectly cross referenced to information discussing threshold requirements and is deleting the incorrect crossreference.
On page 27193, section V.A.3.e.(3), second column, HUD is correcting the requirement for including a separate budget and budget narrative when subgrantees receive a portion of the award.
These corrections are also reflected in the instructions found on
Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants must download the instructions to receive
all forms and instructions related to this NOFA. Applicants are
encouraged to read the instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior to
submitting your application in response to the Lead Outreach Program funding opportunity.
Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency (FSS) Program [27210]
On page 27211, paragraph F under ``Overview Information'', first column, as discussed in this notice, HUD is moving the deadline date for applications to July 16, 2008.
On page 27213, section III.C.3.g. entitled ``Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing'', HUD is revising the timeline for applicants to submit their plans to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH). Specifically, HUD is changing the date for applicants to submit this plan from prior to the application date to prior to the award of funding. This extension is required because implementation of an AFFH policy for the FSS program trigger a 45day public comment period for the proposed AFFH policy followed by board approval of the policy prior to submission to HUD. The original application deadline did not allow sufficient time for PHAs to complete the steps required for approval and submission of their AFFH statements.
These corrections are also reflected in the instructions found on
Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants must download the instructions to receive
all forms and instructions related to this NOFA. Applicants are
encouraged to read the instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior to
submitting your application in response to the Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency Program funding opportunity
Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency Coordinators Program [27230]
On page 27230, section I.B.1, third column, HUD is clarifying for applicants how the number of occupied units should be counted in order to determine the number of positions for which an applicant may apply.
On page 27232, section II.C.1.a., third column, HUD is noting that more than one person may jobshare a Service Coordinator position.
On page 27239, section V.B.2., first column, entitled ``Selection Process for all Grant Categories and All Applicants,'' HUD is clarifying that all Resident Association applicants, even those that apply as nonprofits, must have a contract administrator.
These corrections are also reflected in the instructions found on Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants must download the instructions to receive all forms and instructions related to this NOFA. Applicants are encouraged to read the instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior to submitting your application in response to the Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency Coordinators Program funding opportunity.
On page 27250, section F under ``Overview Information,'' first column, HUD is moving the deadline date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18, 2008.
On page 27253, section III.C.4.e., first column, HUD is clarifying the requirement for applicants to reduce energy costs.
On page 27254, section VI.C., second column entitled, ``Submission Date and Time,'' HUD is moving the deadline date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18, 2008.
On page 27256, under ``Submission Requirements for Rating Factor 3,'' section d., third column entitled ``Cost Effective to the Homebuyer,'' HUD is clarifying the requirement for applicants to disclose the contract sales price to the homebuyer and the appraised or market value of the home.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, second column entitled, ``Rating
Factor 5. Achieving Result and Program Evaluation (10 points),'' HUD is
clarifying that applicants should include actual or estimated costs for utilities and any applicable
[[Page 33448]]
homeownership association fee when comparing total housing costs of new selfhelp units to previous rents.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, third column entitled ``Submission Requirements for Rating Factor 5,'' HUD is revising this section to advises applicants that HUD has developed and posted on Grants.gov a revised eLogic Model form that incorporates the revision to Rating Factor 5 that instructs applicants to include actual or estimated utility and other costs. HUD encourages applicants to download and use the revised eLogic Model.
These corrections are also reflected in the instructions found on Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants must download the instructions to receive all forms and instructions related to this NOFA. Applicants are encouraged to read the instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior to submitting your application in response to the SelfHelp Homeownership Opportunity Program funding opportunity.
Accordingly, in the May 12, 2008, Notice of HUD's FY2008 SuperNOFA
for HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs, beginning at 73 FR 27032, the following corrections are made.
1. Introduction to the SuperNOFAAppendix A Beginning at Page 27035
At page 27035, as discussed in this notice, HUD is moving the
deadline date for the Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency
Program to July 16, 2008. HUD is also moving the deadline date for the
SHOP NOFA to July 18, 2008. As a result, the entries for the Housing
Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency Program and SHOP NOFA on Appendix A at page 27035 should read as follows:
Application deadline (All
applications must be received and
validated by Grants.gov no later
Programs included in the FY2008 SuperNOFA Approximate funding amounts than 11:59:59 p.m., eastern time
available on the application deadline date.
See details in the General
Section.)
Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency $49,000,000 July 16, 2008. (FSS) Program.
CFDA No: 14,871
OMB Approval No.: 25770178
SelfHelp Homeownership Opportunity Program 26,500,000 July 18, 2008. (SHOP).
CFDA No: 14,247
OMB Approval No.: 25060157
2. LeadBased Paint Hazard Control Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and Operation Lead Elimination Action Program [27159]
On page 27161, Section I.B.4., first column, HUD is correcting this section to read as follows:
4. Applicants to the LHRD grant program may request a waiver of the 25 percent match requirement, if the applicant submits a request that meets HUD's criteria. See unit III.B.2, Eligibility Information, below. The request for the waiver of the match, with supporting narrative and documentation, must be submitted in accordance with unit IV.F.2, below, to be received no later than June 23, 2008.
On page 27168, section IV.F.2, first column, HUD is correcting this section to read as follows:
2. Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program match waiver. Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program applicants requesting a waiver from the 25 percent match requirement are required to submit a request by email. LHRD match waiver requests must be submitted no later than 11:59 pm on June 23, 2008, and should be submitted to Jonnette Hawkins, Director, Programs Division, Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control, at Jonnette.G.Hawkins@hud.gov. HUD will respond to the LHRD match waiver requests by email no later than July 2, 2008, and, if a mailing address is provided in a request, by letter within 5 working days thereafter.
On page 27189, Section II entitled ``Eligibility Information'', third column, is corrected to read as follows:
On page 27190, section III entitled ``Application and Submission Information'', second column, is corrected to read as follows: IV. Application and Submission Information
On page 27191, section V.A, third column, HUD is correcting this paragraph to read as follows:
A. Criteria. Applications that meet all of the threshold requirements will be eligible to be scored and ranked, based on the total number of points allocated for each of the rating factors described in this NOFA. The application must receive a total score of at least 75 points to be considered for funding.
On page 27193, section V.A.3.e.(3), second column, HUD is correcting this section to read as follows:
(3) Include a separate budget (HUD424CBW) and budget narrative
for any subgrantee receiving more than 10 percent of total budget request.
4. Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency (FSS) Program beginning at page 27210
On page 27211, paragraph F under ``Overview Information'', first column, is corrected to read as follows:
F. Dates: The application deadline date is July 16, 2008. Please see the General Section for timely receipt requirements.
On page 27213, section III.C.3.g. entitled ``Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing,'' HUD is revising the second sentence of this paragraph to read as follows:
Prior to the award of funding under this NOFA, each applicant must
submit to the public housing director in the applicant's local HUD
field office an addendum to the applicant's HCV administrative plan
that outlines reasonable steps the applicant will take to affirmatively
further fair housing in its HCV FSS program and how it will maintain records of those steps and their impacts.
5. Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency Coordinators Program Beginning at Page 27230
On page 27230, section I.B.1, third column, HUD is correcting this paragraph to read as follows:
1. For PHA and Tribe/TDHE applicants, the number of positions is
determined by number of ACC units. PHAs must use the number of occupied [[Page 33449]]
conventional public housing units as of September 30, 2007. Tribes/
TDHEs must use the number of units counted as Formula Current Assisted
Stock for FY 2007 as defined in 24 CFR 1000.316. Tribes that have not
previously received funds from the Department under the U.S. Housing
Act of 1937 should count housing units under management that are owned
and operated by the Tribe and that are identified in their housing
inventory as of September 30, 2007. Applicants may apply for up to 3
Service Coordinators depending on the size and type of the applicant.
Program ratio for number of eligible Service Coordinators is in the table above under ``Award Amounts.''
On page 27232, section II.C.1.a., third column, correcting this section to read as follows:
a. Salaries and fringe benefits of one or more Service Coordinators. A parttime Service Coordinator may be retained where appropriate, however, the minimum units served remains the same. One or more PHAs may share a fulltime position if that is deemed most appropriate for the applicant's program. More than one person may job share a Service Coordinator position. Although the exact role for the SC shall be designed to meet the needs of the project's community, below is a listing of recommended functions for an SC:
On page 27239, section V.B.2., first column, entitled ``Selection Process for all Grant Categories and All Applicants, HUD is correcting this section to read as follows:
2. Selection Process for All Grant Categories and All Applicants.
All qualified applications will be awarded based on a lottery. Per
statute, twentyfive percent (25%) of funds will be set aside for
Resident Associations and all qualifying Resident Association
applications will be funded first, up to 25 percent of the funding
amount. Even if applying as nonprofits, state, national, and other
incorporated nonprofit Resident Associations will be included in this
setaside. To be included in this Resident Association Category, you
must indicate your status on the HUD52768. If an applicant indicates
that they are a resident council for the purposes of this lottery
designation, they must also supply a contract administrator partner
agreement, even if applying as a nonprofit applicant. If there are more
qualified resident organizations than 25% of the available funding,
there will be an initial lottery for all resident organizations, then
the remaining resident organizations will be put together with the rest of the qualified applicants for a second general lottery.
6. SelfHelp Homeownership Opportunity Program Beginning at Page 27250
On page 27250, section F under ``Overview Information,'' first column, HUD is moving the deadline date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18, 2008, therefore, this section is corrected to read as follows:
F. Dates: The application deadline date for electronic submission and validation in Grants.gov is July 18, 2008. Applications submitted through http://www.grants.gov must be received and validated by Grants.gov no later than 11:59:59 Eastern time on the application deadline date. The validation process may take up to 72 hours.
On page 27253, section III.C.4.e., first column, HUD is clarifying the requirement for applicants to reduce energy cost to read as follows.
e. Reduce Energy Costs. Applicants are required to take specific energysaving actions. In the new construction of selfhelp housing, SHOP applicants must incorporate energyefficiency measures in the design and construction of selfhelp housing units. All newly constructed units assisted with SHOP funds provided under this NOFA must qualify and receive Energy Star Certification by an independent Home Energy Rater (HER) upon completions and only Energy Star labeled products and appliances may be used in these units.
On page 27254, section VI.C., second column entitled, ``Submission Date and Time,'' HUD is moving the deadline date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18, 2008, therefore, this section is corrected to read as follows: C. Submission Date and Time
The electronic application must be received and validated no later than 11:59:59 p.m. Eastern time by Grants.gov on the application deadline date, which is July 18, 2008. The validation process may take 2448 hours. Applicants are advised to submit applications 72 hours in advance. By doing so, if your application fails validation and Grants.gov rejects the application, you have time to correct the noted problems prior to the deadline date. If an applicant is granted a waiver to the electronic application submission requirement, the application must be received at HUD Headquarters by the application deadline date (see General Section).
On page 27256, under ``Submission Requirements for Rating Factor 3,'' section d., third column entitled ``Cost Effective to the Homebuyer,'' HUD is clarifying the requirement for applicants to disclose the contract sales price to the homebuyer and the appraised or market value of the home to read as follows:
d. Cost Effective to the Homebuyer (7 points). State how the sales price for SHOPassisted units is established (provide a table outlining separate costs for land purchase and infrastructure improvements paid by the affiliate; land and infrastructure improvements charged to the homebuyer; construction and projectrelated soft costs, such as architectural, engineering and related professional services; and any other costs charged to the homebuyer including 2nd or additional mortgages that must be repaid by the homebuyer upon sale of the property). You must include in the table the contract sales price to the homebuyer and the appraised or market value. You must demonstrate the extent to which the investment of SHOP funds, the contribution of sweat equity and volunteer labor, donations (e.g., land or building materials), inkind contributions, and financing subsidies, further reduce the sales price to the homebuyer below the appraised value of the house or market value of comparable housing in the neighborhood. This must be demonstrated for homebuyers receiving both USDA and non USDA construction assistance. Applicants showing a larger reduction of the sales price to the homebuyer from the appraised or market value as a result of the use of the SHOP funds for costs that are not charged to the homebuyer, the SHOP homebuyer's sweat equity, volunteer labor, and other contributions and subsidies not repaid by the homebuyer will receive a higher score.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, second column entitled, ``Rating Factor 5. Achieving Result and Program Evaluation (10 points),'' HUD is revising the first paragraph of this section to read as follows:
5. Rating Factor 5. Achieving Results and Program Evaluation (10 points)
This factor emphasizes HUD's determination to track whether
applicants meet commitments made in their applications. HUD requires
SHOP applicants to develop an effective, quantifiable, outcomeoriented
evaluation plan for measuring performance and determining whether goals
have been met using the Master Logic Model for SHOP, which can be found
in the download instructions portion at http://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. Applicants must clearly identify the
``Outputs'' and ``Outcomes'' to be achieved and measured. Completed
newly constructed or rehabilitated selfhelp housing units are outputs. [[Page 33450]]
Outcomes are benefits accruing to the families and/or communities
during or after participation in SHOP. Examples of outcomes include
increasing the homeownership rate in a neighborhood or among lowincome
families by a certain percentage, increasing the property tax base by a
certain value, or increasing housing stability (e.g., increasing assets
of the lowincome homebuyer households by creating household equity or
reducing total housing costs compared to rents that SHOP participants
previously paid. When comparing the total housing costs of new self
help housing units to rents previously paid by homebuyers, applicants
should include actual or estimated costs of utilities for the rental
units and any applicable homeowner association fees and estimated
utilities for the new housing units.) during and beyond the grantee's
period for reporting on property completions. See Reporting in section
VI.C. In addition, applicants must establish interim benchmarks for
which outputs lead to the ultimate achievement of outcomes. ``Interim
benchmarks'' are steps or stages in your activities that, if reached or
completed successfully, will result in outputs for your program.
Examples of interim benchmarks for SHOP include acquisition of land,
completion of infrastructure, identification of incomequalified
homebuyers, obtaining building permits, or securing construction materials and equipment.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, third column entitled ``Submission Requirements for Rating Factor 5,'' HUD is revising this section to read as follows:
Program Evaluation Plan and Logic Model (10 Points). The FY 2008 application requires submission of a written program evaluation plan and a completed eLogicModel \TM\. The eLogicModel \TM\ allows the applicant to select from drop down menus the elements of their program that are captured in the Logic Model. Instructions for the eLogic Model \TM\ are found in Tab 1 of the form HUD96011 found in the instructions download to your electronic application. The Master Logic Model listing also identifies the unit of measure that HUD will collect for the output(s) and outcome(s) selected. Applicants must identify a unit of measure and establish a goal for each output and outcome.
HUD has designated mandatory outputs and outcomes that must be addressed by the applicant. For both ``Housing Constructed'' and ``Housing Rehabilitated,'' applicants must address the following five mandatory Outputs: (1) Sweat Equity (hours); (2) Volunteer Labor (hours); (3) Design incorporates energy efficiency measures and Energy Star Standards (units); (4) Policy PriorityDesign incorporates universal design (units); and (5) Policy PriorityDesign incorporates visitability standards (units).
For both ``New construction'' and ``Rehabilitated units,'' applicants must address the following four mandatory Outcomes: (1) one of the three sets of ``average reduced sales price'' from 110 % (dollars and units) or from 1130% (dollars and units) or greater than 30% (dollars and units)each set counts as two outcomes; (2) Increased housing stabilityaverage decreased housing costs (dollars); and (3) Increased housing stabilityaverage increased assets in savings (dollars).
HUD has revised the eLogic Model \TM\ form HUD96011, Tab 9 labeled ``Outcomes,'' Column 5, Achievement Outcomes Goals and Indicator. Instead of ``percentage,'' the double asterisks (**) footnote should state: ``This is the average dollars of reduced housing costs to the families or increased assets to the families.'' HUD is also clarifying that for the projected outcome ``Increased housing stabilityAverage increased assets in savings,'' applicants are not asked to report on homebuyers' existing savings. This outcome requires applicants to measure the equity in the units at the time properties are completed and families close on their units. This equity increases any other assets in savings homebuyers may have at the time of closing.
If an applicant's program consists of new construction or rehabilitation, but not both, the five mandatory outputs and four outcomes applicable to the program must be selected. If an applicant's program includes both new construction and rehabilitation, applicant must address all mandatory outputs/outcomes. However, applicants are expected to select additional outputs and outcomes identified in their work plan. Further, interim benchmarks, program indicators, outputs, and outcomes must be quantifiable.
You must summarize your program evaluation plan that measures your own program performance. Your plan must measure the performance of individual consortium members and affiliates, including the standards and measurement methods, and the steps you have in place or how you plan to make adjustments if you begin to fall short of established benchmarks and time frames. Applicants that include both mandatory and optional outputs and outcomes and interim benchmarks, and prepare a written evaluation plan that meets the specified content requirements will receive a higher score. HUD will rate the eLogicModel \TM\ submission based upon the matrix contained in Attachment 1 to the General Section.
The Department has been informed that applicants have experienced trouble completing the Application for Federal Assistance SF424 electronic form in the Grants.gov funding opportunity application package. Specifically, the Department has been alerted that if an applicant checks ``No'' to question number 20 (Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt?) and inadvertently places his or her cursor and clicks on the space on page 4 entitled ``Applicant Federal Debt Delinquency Explanation,'' the SF424 will make the space a mandatory field that is yellow in color. The SF424 will not allow applicants to enter text in the mandatory field. The reason for this behavior is that Adobe Reader 8.1.1 and 8.1.2 opens with a default with the Text Select Tool pointer (which look like a finger). This default was intended by Adobe Reader. The issue that this causes for Grants.gov forms is that the Text Select Tool, if clicked in a readonly form field will make the field mandatory without any means to fill in text or change it back to read only. As a result, HUD is advising applicants to avoid placing their cursors in the explanation space provided on the form if they check the response to question 20 as ``No.''
If an applicant inadvertently triggers the creation of the mandatory field, the way to clear the form of the problem is to go back to question 20, click the ``Yes'' box and then click the ``No'' box. This brings the form back to the original state and eliminates the explanation field from being a mandatory field. An alternative way to address the issue is to go to the menu bar, select ``Tools,'' select from the dropdown bar ``Select and Zoom'' and then select ``Hand Tool.'' The Grants.gov help desk has been alerted to this issue and can help applicants address this issue.
In addition, applicants are alerted that the form contains edit
checks. To avoid a rejection notice, please make sure that dates
provided in response to question 17, ``Proposed Project Start and end
date,'' are internally consistent and that the project does not end
prior to its proposed start date. If an applicant mistakenly provides a project end date that is prior to the start date, the
[[Page 33451]]
package will be rejected by Grants.gov due to an internal
HUD again strongly advises applicants to submit their application
to Grants.gov 72 hours in advance to the deadline date so that if they
receive a rejection error, there is sufficient time for the applicant
to cure the problem and resubmit in time to meet the deadline date requirements.
Dated: June 9, 2008.
Keith A. Nelson,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[FR Doc. E813285 Filed 61108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 421067P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Questions regarding the General Section of March 19, 2008, should be directed to the NOFA Information Center between the hours of 10 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time at (800) HUD8929. Hearingimpaired persons may call 800HUD2209. For the programs listed in this notice, please contact the office or individual listed under section VII of the applicable program sections of the SuperNOFA, published on May 12, 2008.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522