This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal Register document through the electronic docket at http:// www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's pilot eCFR site at http:// www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.

C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

Under section 408(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA), any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPAHQOPP20071107 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before August 12, 2008.

In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID number EPAHQOPP20071107, by one of the following methods:

II. Background and Statutory Findings

EPA, on its own initiative, in accordance with sections 408(e) and 408(l)(6) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(e) and 346a(1)(6), is establishing timelimited tolerances for combined residues of the herbicide fenoxapropethyl, [()ethyl 2[4[(6chloro2
benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoate], and its metabolites (2[4[(6 chloro2benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid and 6chloro2,3 dihydrobenzoxazol2one) in or on grass forage and hay at 0.05 parts per million (ppm). These timelimited tolerances expire and are revoked on December 31, 2010. EPA will publish a document in the Federal Register to remove the revoked tolerances from the CFR.

Section 408(l)(6) of FFDCA requires EPA to establish a timelimited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under section 18 of FIFRA. Such tolerances can be established without providing notice or period for public comment. EPA does not intend for its actions on section 18 related timelimited tolerances to set binding precedents for the application of section 408 of FFDCA to other tolerances and exemptions. Section 408(e) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance or an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance on its own initiative, i.e., without having received any petition from an outside party.

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .''

Section 18 of FIFRA authorizes EPA to exempt any Federal or State agency from any provision of FIFRA, if EPA determines that ``emergency conditions exist which require such exemption.'' EPA has established regulations governing such emergency exemptions in 40 CFR part 166. III. Emergency Exemption for Fenoxapropethyl on Grasses Grown for Seed and FFDCA Tolerances

The Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) states that an emergency situation has arisen from weed problems that were once controlled with an older product, under Special Local Needs (SLN) registrations that were in effect from 1987 to 2002. Since 2002, the growers have been lacking a method to effectively control the problem weeds and the problem has continued to worsen since the SLNs were cancelled. The ODA states that none of the herbicides currently registered for use on grasses grown for seed are effective for controlling the weed species addressed by their request, or do not provide adequate control, due to timing of application, or spectrum of control. Cultural controls are not viable alternatives due to the soil type, steep terrain, density of grass stand; or adaptability of the weed species to various grass seed production systems, such as varying planting date, row spacing, or grass variety planted. In grass seed production, the presence of noxious weed seeds like wild oat, results in significant discounts to the sale prices, and certain states and countries completely prohibit sale of grass seed containing noxious weed species; thus, growers suffer losses of significant sales. Certain weed species can also cause yield losses of up to 50%
[[Page 33716]]
under moderate to high infestation levels. Therefore, ODA states that an urgent and nonroutine situation has arisen, with significant economic losses expected. After having reviewed the submission, EPA determined that emergency conditions exist for this State, and that the criteria for an emergency exemption are met. EPA has authorized under FIFRA section 18 the use of fenoxapropethyl on grasses grown for seed for control of grassy weeds in Oregon.

As part of its evaluation of the emergency exemption application, EPA assessed the potential risks presented by residues of fenoxaprop ethyl in or on grass forage and hay. In doing so, EPA considered the safety standard in section 408(b)(2) of FFDCA, and EPA decided that the necessary tolerance under section 408(l)(6) of FFDCA would be consistent with the safety standard and with FIFRA section 18. Consistent with the need to move quickly on the emergency exemption in order to address an urgent nonroutine situation and to ensure that the resulting food is safe and lawful, EPA is issuing this tolerance without notice and opportunity for public comment as provided in section 408(l)(6) of FFDCA. Although these timelimited tolerances expire and are revoked on December 31, 2010, under section 408(l)(5) of FFDCA, residues of the pesticide not in excess of the amounts specified in the tolerance remaining in or on grass forage and hay after that date will not be unlawful, provided the pesticide was applied in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA, and the residues do not exceed a level that was authorized by these timelimited tolerances at the time of that application. EPA will take action to revoke these timelimited tolerances earlier if any experience with, scientific data on, or other relevant information on this pesticide indicate that the residues are not safe.

Because these timelimited tolerances are being approved under emergency conditions, EPA has not made any decisions about whether fenoxapropethyl meets FIFRA's registration requirements for use on grasses grown for seed or whether permanent tolerances for this use would be appropriate. Under these circumstances, EPA does not believe that this timelimited tolerance decision serves as a basis for registration of fenoxapropethyl by a State for special local needs under FIFRA section 24(c). Nor do these tolerances serve as the basis for persons in any State other than Oregon to use this pesticide on these crops under FIFRA section 18 absent the issuance of an emergency exemption applicable within that State. For additional information regarding the emergency exemption for fenoxapropethyl, contact the Agency's Registration Division at the address provided under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .''

Consistent with the factors specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure expected as a result of this emergency exemption request and the timelimited tolerances for combined residues of fenoxapropethyl on grass forage and hay at 0.05 ppm. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with establishing timelimited tolerances follows. A. Toxicological Endpoints

For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no appreciable risk, a toxicological point of departure (POD) is identified as the basis for derivation of reference values for risk assessment. The POD may be defined as the highest dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) in the toxicology study identified as appropriate for use in risk assessment. However, if a NOAEL cannot be determined, the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the LOAEL) or a Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach is sometimes used for risk assessment. Uncertainty/safety factors (UFs) are used in conjunction with the POD to take into account uncertainties inherent in the extrapolation from laboratory animal data to humans and in the variations in sensitivity among members of the human population as well as other unknowns. Safety is assessed for acute and chronic dietary risks by comparing aggregate food and water exposure to the pesticide to the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD) and chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD). The aPAD and cPAD are calculated by dividing the POD by all applicable UFs. Aggregate shortterm, intermediateterm, and chronicterm risks are evaluated by comparing food, water, and residential exposure to the POD to ensure that the margin of exposure (MOE) called for by the product of all applicable UFs is not exceeded. This latter value is referred to as the Level of Concern (LOC).

For nonthreshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of the adverse effect greater than that expected in a lifetime. For more information on the general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/ pesticides/factsheets/riskassess.htm.

A summary of the toxicological endpoints for fenoxapropethyl used for human risk assessment is discussed in Unit II. of the final rule published in the Federal Register of April 22, 1998 (63 FR 19829) (FRL 57821).

B. Exposure Assessment

EPA believes that no changes need to be made as a result of this section 18 emergency exemption use on grasses grown for seed, to the conclusions of the risk assessment discussed in the final rule published on April 22, 1998 in the Federal Register (63 FR 19829) (FRL 57821) which established tolerances in barley commodities. EPA has used barley data to estimate residues which could occur on the hay and forage from grasses grown for seed, and this section 18 use is not expected to change the aggregate exposure estimates from the 1998 barley assessment. This conclusion is based upon the position that this section 18 use will not contribute to human dietary exposure for the following reasons:

1. This section 18 use does not involve use on human foods; and

2. This section 18 use is unlikely to alter the dietary burden for livestock (and corresponding residues in livestock tissues) because the resulting feed commodities do not comprise a significant part of livestock diet.

[[Page 33717]]

Therefore, because EPA has reasonable certainty of no harm from dietary exposure from the existing uses, and, that this use on grasses grown for seed pursuant to the emergency exemption would not increase dietary exposure, EPA is establishing these timelimited tolerances for grass hay and forage.

Since the time of the 1998 risk assessment, there has been a shift to (+) fenoxapropethyl (the risomer enriched (95%) formulation of fenoxapropethyl) as the primary active ingredient (also referred to as fenoxapropPethyl to denote the direction in which it rotates polarized light), rather than a 50:50 mix of ()fenoxaprop ethyl (the racemic mixture of the r and s isomers) both referred to in this document as the parent, fenoxapropethyl. The current tolerance action is for fenoxapropethyl, which covers both the ``+'' and ``'' isomers. The analytical method used to determine residues of fenoxapropethyl and its metabolites, expressed as the parent, is unable to distinguish between stereochemical isomers. Further, adequate data was provided (for barley) to indicate that comparable residue results are obtained from application of either the 50:50 mixture, or the socalled ``enriched'' mixture. At the time of the change in formulation, EPA determined that the established tolerances would protect human health and that the existing toxicology data supported the continued registration with the enriched formulation. EPA determined that there was a reasonable certainty of no harm from the continued registrations of the enriched formulation. EPA has determined that, for the purposes of this section 18 use only, the residue data for barley may be relied on for grass hay and forage, since the use patterns are nearly identical. For these reasons, as well as those given in Unit IV.B.1. and 2., the agency believes that the existing data are adequate to support these tolerances.

EPA concludes that establishing the tolerances for grass hay and forage, as set forth in this document, will not change the estimated aggregate risks, as discussed in the April 22, 1998 Federal Register. Refer to the April 22, 1998 Federal Register document for a detailed discussion of the aggregate risk assessments and determination of safety. EPA relies upon those risk assessments and the findings made in the Federal Register document in support of this action.

Based on the risk assessments discussed in the final rule published in the Federal Register of April 22, 1998, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate exposure to fenoxapropethyl residues.
V. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

Adequate enforcement methodology (electron capture gas chromatography) is available to enforce the tolerance expression. The method is available in the Pesticide Analytical Manual (PAM) II, and may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 207555350; telephone number: (410) 3052905; email address:
residuemethods@epa.gov. B. International Residue Limits

There are no established Codex tolerances for fenoxapropethyl and its metabolites in or on grass forage or hay.

VI. Conclusion

Therefore, timelimited tolerances are established for combined residues of fenoxapropethyl [()ethyl 2[4[(6chloro2 benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid], and its metabolites (2[4 [(6chloro2benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid and 6chloro2,3 dihydrobenzoxazol2one), in or on grass hay and grass forage, both at 0.05 ppm. These tolerances expire and are revoked on December 31, 2010. VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

This final rule establishes tolerances under sections 408(e) and 408(l)(6) of FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and LowIncome Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

Since tolerances and exemptions that are established in accordance with sections 408(e) and 408(l)(6) of FFDCA, such as the tolerances in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.

This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition, this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 1044).

This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VIII. Congressional Review Act

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
[[Page 33718]]

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: June 4, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.430 is amended by adding text to paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.430 Fenoxapropethyl; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
(b) Section 18 emergency exemptions. Timelimited tolerances are established for combined residues of the herbicide fenoxapropethyl, [()ethyl 2[4[(6chloro2
benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid], and its metabolites (2[4 [(6chloro2benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acid and 6chloro2,3 dihydrobenzoxazol2one), each expressed as fenoxapropethyl, in connection with use of the pesticide under section 18 emergency exemptions granted by EPA, in or on the food commodities in the following table. The tolerances expire and are revoked on the dates specified in the following table.
Expiration/ Commodity Parts per million revocation date Grass, forage..................... 0.05 12/31/10 Grass, hay........................ 0.05 12/31/10 * * * * *
[FR Doc. E813372 Filed 61208; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656050S

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Andrea Conrath, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 204600001; telephone number: (703) 3089356; email address: conrath.andrea@epa.gov.