Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FR-4812-F-03]
RIN ID: RIN 2502-AH97
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Manufactured Home Installation Program
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This final rule establishes a federal manufactured home installation program, as required by section 605(c)(2)(A) of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974. States that have their own installation programs that include the elements required by statute are permitted to administer, under their state installation programs, the new requirements established through this final rulemaking. The new elements required by statute to be integrated into an acceptable state manufactured home installation program are: The establishment of qualified installation standards; the licensing and training of installers; and the inspection of the installation of manufactured homes.
SUMMARY: Housing and Urban Development Department,
The National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 54015426) (``the Act'') is intended, in part, to protect the quality, safety, durability, and affordability of manufactured homes, and was amended on December 27, 2000 (Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000, Title VI, Pub. L. 106659, 114 Stat. 2997). In order to accomplish those objectives, the Act requires HUD to, among other things, establish and implement a new manufactured home installation program for states that choose not to operate their own installation programs. Specifically, section 605 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5404) calls for the establishment of an installation program that includes installation standards, the training and licensing of manufactured home installers, and inspection of the installation of manufactured homes. The model manufactured home installation standards (``the installation standards'') themselves can be found in a separate final rule, which was published on October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59338). Any state that wishes to operate its own installation program must contain state installation standards that afford residents of manufactured homes at least the same protection provided by the federal installation standards.
Although a state that wants to operate its own installation program is not required to be a State Administrative Agency (``SAA'') established pursuant to HUD's Manufactured Home Procedural and Enforcement Regulations (see 24 CFR part 3282), any state that submits a new state plan to become an SAA after the implementation of the Manufactured Home Installation Program must include a complying installation program as part of its plan. As a result, any state that becomes an SAA for the first time, or any state that becomes an SAA again after a lapse in its SAA status, will be required to administer its own compliant installation program.
On June 14, 2006, at 71 FR 34476, HUD published the Manufactured Home Installation Program proposed rule with a comment due date of August 14, 2006. There were a total of 35 commenters on the June 14, 2006, proposed rule. Twentyseven of the commenters were from the manufactured home industry, including manufacturers, component suppliers, retailers, installers, trade associations, and community operators. Five commenters were from SAAs. The remaining commenters were a consumer group, the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee (MHCC), and one member of the insurance industry.
HUD worked closely and participated in several meetings with the MHCC in order to obtain their input and suggestions. In response to comments from the public and input from the MHCC, HUD has made a few significant changes to the proposed rule.
This section of the preamble discusses general areas of interest to commenters. One of the general recommendations most often made by the commenters was to codify the Manufactured Home Installation Program in the existing 24 CFR part 3282, rather than in the new part Sec. 3286, in the belief that the installation program would thereby become ``preemptive'' of state and local installation requirements in states where HUD administers the installation program.
Commenters requested that the installation program and installation standards be made preemptive of state and local requirements in states where HUD administers the installation program. However, HUD has concluded that a plain reading of sections 604(d) and 605 of the Act indicates that Congress did not intend for the installation program or the installation standards to be preemptive of more stringent state or local government requirements. This conclusion is strengthened by the legislative history of the Act. During his sectionbysection comments on the floor of the House when the Act was being debated, then House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jim Leach stated that ``the bill would reinforce the proposition that installation standards and regulations remain under the exclusive authority of each state.'' (See Dec. 5, 2000, 146 Cong. Rec. H1196001.) In ``Additional Views'' that were included in the House Report on the bill, then Ranking Committee Member John LaFalce noted that ``for the first time, we will be setting a national minimum installation standard * * *'' (H. Rpt. 106553, pg. 182). In earlier floor remarks, Rep. LaFalce said, ``[s]tates that wish to have their own installation standards may continue to do so, as long as they provide protections comparable to the model standards.'' (Oct. 24, 2000, 146 Cong. Rec. H10685). HUD, therefore, concludes that Congress has permitted state governments to implement installation standards that are more stringent than the federal installation standards, provided that those state standards otherwise offer protection that equals or exceeds the minimum protection established by the installation standards.
Commenters, including the MHCC, continued to state that the
Manufactured Home Installation Program should be codified under 24 CFR
part 3282, Manufactured Home Procedural and Enforcement Regulations. Contrary to the views expressed by these commenters,
[[Page 35271]]
preemption authority can come only from Congress, and no decision that
HUD makes regarding the codification of the Manufactured Home
Installation Program could increase or diminish that authority. As
indicated above, HUD has concluded that Congress did not intend to
extend preemption authority to the installation of manufactured homes.
In any event, HUD has chosen, as a matter of administrative necessity, to codify the Manufactured Home Installation Program in a new 24 CFR part 3286 in order to maintain the clear distinctions that the Act makes between installation and construction. The regulatory structure that Congress has given HUD for enforcement of the Manufactured Home Installation Program is entirely different from the enforcement authority it previously gave HUD for the Federal Manufactured Home Procedural and Enforcement Regulations. As HUD reads sections 613 (42 U.S.C. 5412) and 615 (42 U.S.C. 5414) of the Act, the principal sections requiring notification and correction of defects, these sections do not apply to the installation of manufactured homes. As HUD reads the Act, the primary enforcement authority for the installation of manufactured homes, implemented through sections 610 and 611 (42 U.S.C. 5409 and 5410, respectively), is section 605 (42 U.S.C. 5404) itself, which not only provides more limited authority for the installation of manufactured homes, but adds new requirements regarding the licensing and training of installers.
Given these fundamental differences between the installation and construction and safety programs, publication of the Manufactured Home Installation Program in a new 24 CFR part 3286 will best allow HUD to maintain the regulatory separation necessary to administer two such different programs.
Commenters stated that the purpose of the Manufactured Home Installation Program should be to establish HUD's default installation program for those states that do not meet the required elements of the Act through state law. The rule should not be used to create a prescriptive baseline standard for each statebased installation program. In order to avoid confusion on this issue, the final rule sets out, in discrete subparts: (1) Manufactured home installation requirements that are applicable in all states (subpart A) and to all manufacturers; (2) requirements that are applicable in only those states in which HUD is administering the installation program (subparts B through H); and (3) requirements for states that wish to apply to administer their own installation programs in lieu of the HUD program (subpart I). Further, to make the applicable requirements more readily identifiable, the final rule separately organizes the requirements that apply to the retailers, distributors, installers, installation trainers, and installation inspectors in states where HUD administers the installation program.
The MHCC was particularly concerned that the Manufactured Home Installation Program proposed rule required compliance with the installation standards, and not with the installation design and instructions provided by the manufacturer. HUD agreed with the MHCC that it would be better for the consumer to require compliance with the manufacturer's installation design and instructions, since such designs and instructions may differ from the installation standards by providing requirements that not only exceed the installation standards, but are also specific to the installation requirements of the particular home being installed.
The final rule of the installation program requires that the manufactured home be installed in accordance with:
(1) An installation design and instructions that have been provided
by the manufacturer and approved by the Secretary directly or through
review by the Design Approval Primary Inspection Agency (DAPIA); or
(2) An installation design and instructions that have been prepared
and certified by a professional engineer or registered architect and
have been approved by the manufacturer and the DAPIA as providing a
level of protection for residents of the home that equals or exceeds
the protection provided by the federal installation standards in part 3285 of this chapter.
This section of the preamble discusses specific, sectionbysection areas of interest to commenters. In response to the comments and the MHCC's input, HUD has made a few significant changes to the proposed rule.
Section 3286.2(d)(3) Applicability. Many commenters suggested expanding the Manufactured Home Installation Program to cover secondary installations of manufactured homes in addition to initial installations. It is HUD's position that Congress intended the installation program to be applicable only to the initial installation of new manufactured homes, as indicated by references in section 623(g) of the Act to the date of installation and by the definition of ``purchaser'' as the first purchaser in section 603 of the Act. A very small percentage of manufactured homes are ever relocated after initial siting and placement of the homes. The Manufactured Home Procedural and Enforcement Regulations encourage States to establish procedures for the inspection of used manufactured homes and for monitoring of the installation of manufactured homes within each State (Sec. 3282.303), indicating the intent of Congress to place the supervision of reinstallments in the hands of the States.
The final rule clarifies that the installation program does not prevent State and local governments from regulating subsequent installations of manufactured homes. State standards for initial installation must meet or exceed HUD's minimum installation standards, while state standards for secondary installations do not have to adhere to the minimum HUD standards. HUD concludes that any subsequent installation of a manufactured home resides with State authority.
Section 3286.103 DAPIAapproved installation instructions. HUD agrees with the commenters who stated that the retailer must provide the purchaser with a copy of the DAPIAapproved installation instruction manual for each home in states where HUD administers the installation program. However, the retailer should not be required to provide an installation design and instructions if the retailer has not agreed to provide any set up in connection with the sale of the home and the installation requires a design that is different than that provided by the manufacturer's installation manual for the home. HUD agrees that the retailer or manufacturer should provide the installation design and instructions for installations that require designs that differ from those provided by the manufacturer's instruction manual when the retailer or manufacturer agrees to provide any set up in connection with the sale of the home. The proposed rule placed the entire burden of providing the installation instructions upon the retailer.
Accordingly, the final rule has been revised to require the
retailer to provide the purchaser with a copy of the DAPIAapproved
installation instructions for each manufactured home, and to require
the retailer or manufacturer to provide to the installer the
installation design and instructions for installations that require
designs that differ from those provided by the manufacturer when the retailer or manufacturer agrees to
[[Page 35272]]
provide any set up in connection with the sale of the home. Although
either the retailer or the manufacturer now has the responsibility to
provide instructions to the installer, rather than only the retailer,
the overall burden associated with the requirement to provide instructions has not changed.
The final rule does not require the retailer or manufacturer to provide installation instructions to the installer if the retailer or manufacturer has not agreed to provide any set up in connection with the sale of the home, since the installer performing the installation may not be known by the retailer or manufacturer.
Section 3286.109 Inspection requirementsgenerally. HUD agrees with commenters who stated that the requirements in the proposed rule may delay the completion of sale. The original wording extended the completion of sale date to the date that the home was installed. This may have had an adverse effect on retailers when they do not provide set up in connection with the sale of the home, since the retailer's duties would not end until an independent third party completed its work. HUD has made appropriate revisions to this section, in order to clarify when a sale is complete.
Section 3286.405 Site suitability. HUD agrees with the many commenters who stated that it should be the installer's responsibility to verify site suitability for the installation of a home. Subpart C of the Model Installation Standards includes many site preparation requirements that must be performed during the installation of the manufactured home. Accordingly, the licensed installer is responsible for determining the suitability of the site with regard to the requirements in the Model Installation Standards. The requirements are not the responsibility of the retailer or manufacturer.
Section 3286.803(b) Minimum elements. A majority of commenters stated that the provision for a state to prove it has adequate funding in order to be approved to run its own installation program should be removed and is not a requirement of the Act. HUD, however, believes that the requirement is appropriate. The final rule should also include an additional item that would allow HUD to approve state installation programs, provided the state demonstrates an alternative means for achieving the end goal of improved manufactured housing.
In response to the public comments and subsequent reevaluation by HUD, the following is a summary, by subpart, of the sectionbysection revisions being made to the Manufactured Home Installation Program proposed rule.
A new paragraph (b), ``Implementation,'' is added to Sec. 3286.1 to provide for Federal Register publication of an implementation schedule for the various components of the installation program. HUD will publish a separate notice setting forth a timetable for implementation of the elements of the program, for example, the program's installer training and licensing requirements, to provide an orderly transition to a fully operational installation program.
Paragraph (d)(2) of Sec. 3286.2 makes clear that states that administer their own installation program may regulate subsequent installations of manufactured homes. Further, new paragraph (d)(4) was added to Sec. 3286.2 recognizing that HUD does not have the authority to regulate the installation of manufactured homes on Indian reservations.
In response to comments, certain definitions, including definitions for manufactured housing installation instructions and installation, have either been added or modified in Sec. 3286.3 of the final rule in order to provide clarity.
Section 3286.5 was modified to provide an overview of the HUD
administered installation program and the stateadministered
installation programs. The installer requirements are being moved to
Subpart C, since these requirements are applicable only in states where
HUD administers the installation program. The manufacturer must also
include instructions for protecting the interior of the manufactured
home or sections of homes from damage, pending the first siting of the
home for occupancy. The instructions must be adequate to ensure that
the temporary supports and weatherization used will be sufficient to
prevent the home and its transportable sections from falling out of
conformance with the Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety
Standards (MHCSS) in part 3280 of this chapter, if the home or its sections is either:
(i) Stored at any location for more than 30 days; or
(ii) In the possession of any entity for more than 30 days.
Paragraph (b) of Sec. 3286.7 was revised to require the retailer to provide the purchaser or lessee with a consumer disclosure prior to execution of the sales contract to purchase, or of the lease agreement to lease, a manufactured home. This disclosure must be in a document separate from the sales or lease agreement.
Section 3286.9 was revised to ensure that the manufacturer's reporting requirements in the installation program are consistent with the reporting requirements in Sec. 3282.552. Form HUD302 will be used to collect the information from the manufacturer.
The final rule has been revised to require retailers to update the
tracking and installation information only for homes installed in
states where HUD administers the installation program; therefore, Sec. 3286.13 is being moved to Sec. 3286.113.
Subpart BCertification of Installation in HUDAdministered States
A new Sec. 3286.102, that details the information that the manufacturer must provide to retailers or distributors, was added. It also requires the manufacturer to include a notice in the installation instructions that the home must comply with installation designs and instructions that are approved by either the Secretary of HUD or by the manufacturer's DAPIA.
Section 3286.103(a) was revised to require the retailer to provide a copy of the manufacturer's DAPIAapproved installation instructions for each home. The retailer or manufacturer must also provide an installation design and instructions if: (1) the installation requires a design that is different from that provided by the manufacturer, and (2) the retailer or manufacturer agrees to provide any set up in connection with the sale of the home.
A new paragraph (b) has been added to Sec. 3286.105 that requires the retailer or manufacturer to ensure that the installer is licensed if the retailer or manufacturer agrees to provide any set up in connection with the sale or lease of the home.
Section 3286.107 has been revised to require installers to comply with the manufacturer's installation design, or with alternative designs and instructions that were prepared by a professional engineer or registered architect, as long as the alternative designs and instructions have been reviewed and approved by the manufacturer and its DAPIA.
A new paragraph (a)(4) has been added to Sec. 3286.107 that
clearly sets out that any installation defect caused by the installer's
work is the joint responsibility of the installer and of the retailer
or manufacturer that retained the installer. A new Sec. 3286.107(a)(5)
also makes them jointly and severally liable for the correction of any failures
[[Page 35273]]
Section 3286.109 was revised to require the installer to certify, and the inspector to verify, that the home has been installed in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 3286.107(a) before the home can be occupied.
Section 3286.113 was revised to delete references to the sale of the home and instead require retailers to provide tracking information and installation information only for homes installed in states where HUD administers the installation program. The proposed rule required the tracking information to be provided to HUD for all homes. The option of the Internetbased tracking system established by HUD was deleted. Retailer record retention requirements were shortened from 5 to 3 years.
Section 3286.115 of the proposed rule was revised to include the date that the installer certified that all required inspections were completed as part of the date of installation.
Section 3286.117 was modified to redefine the completion of sale date.
Section 3286.205(d) was revised to require an applicant for an installation license to obtain, when available in the state of installation, a surety bond or insurance that will cover the cost of repairing all damage to the home and its supports caused by the installer during the installation. The value of such bond or insurance must cover the costs of repair of any incidents that render the home defective, up to and including replacement of the home. The proposed rule required the installer to maintain general liability insurance in the amount of at least $1 million. This change will link the installer's costs more closely to the number of homes installed, rather than imposing a level cost regardless of the number of homes installed. Smaller installation operations that have a lesser volume of installations will benefit from this requirement.
Section 3286.303(d) was revised to shorten the period during which
trainers and continuing education providers must retain records from 5 to 3 years.
Subpart EInstaller Responsibilities of Installation in HUD
Section 3286.405(b) was revised to require the installer to identify the reasons why a site is unsuitable for installation when the installer has found that a site is unsuitable. The installer is also required to notify HUD of the site's unsuitability, in addition to notifying the retailer when it has made such a finding.
Two new paragraphs, (c) and (d), were added to Sec. 3286.405.
These paragraphs make clear that if the installer notices and
recognizes any failures to comply with the construction and safety
standards in part 3280 of this chapter prior to beginning any
installation work, during the course of the installation work, or after
the installation work is complete, the installer must notify the
manufacturer and the retailer of each failure to comply. Additionally,
the retailer must provide a copy of the notification received in
paragraphs (b) (site suitability) and (c) (construction and safety failures) of this section to any subsequent installer.
Section 3286.409(d) was removed.
Section 3286.411(c) was modified and moved to Sec. 3286.113.
Section 3286.413(b) was revised to shorten the period during which installers must retain records from the 5 years set out in the Manufactured Home Installation Program proposed rule to 3 years. Subpart FInspection of Installation in HUDAdministered States
A new paragraph (c) was added to Sec. 3286.503 requiring the installer to provide installation instructions to the inspector.
Section 3286.507(a) was revised to clarify that the installation verification provided by the inspector must be in writing.
International Code Councilcertified inspectors were added to the list of qualified inspectors in Sec. 3286.511(a).
Subpart GRetailer Responsibilities in HUDAdministered States
A new paragraph (c) was added to Sec. 3286.603 that requires the
retailer or manufacturer to verify that the installer is licensed when
the retailer or manufacturer agrees to provide any set up in connection with the sale or lease of the home.
Subpart HOversight and Enforcement in HUDAdministered States
The sections in subpart H are the same as in the proposed rule. They are not revised by this final rule.
Sections 3286.801 and 3286.803(a) were revised to clarify that states that administer their own installation programs may do so either as part of their approved state plan or under Subpart I of the Manufactured Home Installation Program rule.
The time frames in Sec. 3286.805(c) were revised to 90 days based on a comment from the MHCC that the time frames be consistent and that 90 days is a reasonable time frame for both actions.
Section 3286.807 was revised to require states to submit a new
State Installation Program Certification form to the Secretary for
review every 5 years after the state's most recent certification as a qualified installation program.
V. Findings and Certifications
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed this rule under Executive Order 12866 (entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review''). OMB determined that this rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of the order (although not an economically significant regulatory action, as provided under section 3(f)(1) of the order). The docket file is available for public inspection between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in the Office of the Rules Docket Clerk, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 204100500. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, please schedule an appointment to review the docket file by calling the Regulations Division at 2027083055 (this is not a tollfree number). Hearingor speechimpaired individuals may access this number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service at 1800877 8339.
The information collection requirements contained in this final rule have been approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35013520) and assigned OMB Control Number 25020253. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
15311538) establishes requirements for federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. This rule does not impose any
federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal government or the private sector
[[Page 35274]]
within the meaning of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Environmental Review
A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment was made at the proposed rule stage in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 50, which implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) and remains applicable to this final rule. The Finding of No Significant Impact is available for public inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 204100500. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, please schedule an appointment to review the docket file by calling the Regulations Division at 2027083055 (this is not a tollfree number). Hearingor speechimpaired individuals may access this number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service at 18008778339.
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, an agency from promulgating a regulation that has federalism implications and either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and is not required by statute, or preempts state law, unless the relevant requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order are met. This rule does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive Order.
HUD is required by statute to establish an installation program through the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (the Act) (42 U.S.C. 54015426). However, in accordance with the Act and as set forth in this proposed rule, this Manufactured Home Installation Program is not preemptive. Therefore, HUD has determined that the Model Installation Standards, if adopted, have no federalism implications that warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment in accordance with Executive Order 13132. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires agencies to consider the impact of their rules on small entities. Agencies must evaluate the impact of a rule on small entities and describe their efforts to minimize the adverse impacts.
As part of the proposed rule, HUD prepared an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) that evaluated the potential economic
impact on the small entities the regulations would affect, including:
manufacturers, retailers, installers, and trainers. Pursuant to the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603), HUD
prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), which follows in its entirety.
Manufactured Home Installation Program Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis: Reason That the Action Is Being Considered
On December 27, 2000, the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 54015426) was amended by the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000, which, among other things, requires the Secretary to establish an installation program for the enforcement of the Model Manufactured Home Installation Standards in each state that does not have an installation program established by state law and approved by the Department.
The objective of the final rule is to establish the Manufactured
Home Installation Program in each state that does not have an
installation program established by state law and establish the
requirements that must be met by a state to implement and administer
its own installation program. The Manufactured Home Installation Program includes:
There were a total of 35 commenters on the June 14, 2006, proposed rule. Twentyseven of the commenters were from the manufactured home industry, including manufacturers, component suppliers, retailers, installers, trade associations, and community operators. Five commenters were from State Administrative Agencies (SAAs). The remaining commenters included one member of the insurance industry, a consumer group, and the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee (MHCC).
None of the comments received addressed the IRFA. However, the
Department did receive two general comments regarding the Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis summary in the preamble of the proposed rule. The comments were:
In developing the proposed rule, the Department developed an
installation program that implemented the statutory requirements
outlined in the Act, while balancing protection for the consumer with
the economic impact on small entities. Appendix A of the IRFA indicates
that the five regulatory requirements in the proposed rule with the
largest individual economic impact account for approximately 86 percent
of total estimated cost increase of a manufactured home. The
information in Table 1 summarizes these findings and a discussion follows for each summary:
[[Page 35275]]
Table 1
Cost impact Cost impact
Summary of regulatory requirement per single per multi
Regulation establishing liability $302.52 $302.52 insurance for installers in states
without a qualifying installation
program................................
Regulation requiring the inspection of 300.00 350.00 every manufactured home installation in
states without a qualifying
installation program...................
Regulation establishing initial training 102.86 102.86 for installers in states without a
qualifying installation program........
Regulation establishing continuing 71.09 71.09 education for installers in states
without a qualifying installation
program................................
Regulation establishing recordkeeping 62.02 62.02 requirements for installers in states
without a qualifying installation
program. Requires that all information
1. Liability InsuranceSection 3286.205(d) of the proposed rule required an applicant for an installation license to provide evidence of general liability insurance in the amount of at least $1 million. The Department received comments suggesting eliminating or reducing the limits on the provision. Additional commenters suggested including a surety or insurance bond to protect the consumers from faulty installation designs or incomplete work.
The Department agrees with the commenters that surety or insurance bonds would provide better protection to the consumer than the liability insurance requirement. Therefore, the Department replaced the liability insurance requirement in the proposed rule with a surety bond/insurance requirement that is sufficient to cover the cost of repairing all damage to the home and its supports caused by the installer during the installation of the home. (See Sec. 3286.205(d) in the final rule). This change also reduced the burden on small entities.
2. InspectionsSection 3286.505 of the proposed rule required each manufactured home installed in states where HUD administers the installation program to be inspected. Section 605 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5404) calls for the establishment of an installation program that includes inspection of the installation of manufactured homes. Many commenters suggested inspecting less than 100 percent of all installations. The Department does not have any evidence that suggests such an inspection program would provide sufficient consumer protection; therefore, the final rule remains unchanged.
3. Installer TrainingSection 3286.205(b)(1) of the proposed rule required an applicant for an installation license to complete 12 hours of training in states where HUD administers the installation program. Section 605 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5404) calls for the establishment of an installation program that includes installer training. The Department did not receive any comments regarding the initial training of installers; therefore, the final rule remains unchanged.
4. Installer Continuing EducationSection 3286.205(b)(2) of the proposed rule required the licensed installer in states where HUD administers the installation program to complete 8 hours of continuing education during the 3year license period to qualify for renewal of an installation license. The Department did not receive any comments regarding the continuing education requirement for installers; therefore, the final rule remains unchanged.
5. Installer RecordsSection 3286.413 of the proposed rule
required that installers maintain the required records for 5 years
after the installer certifies completion of the home in states where
HUD administers the installation program. Fifteen commenters suggested
reducing the record retention requirement to 3 years. The Department
agreed and changed the record retention requirement to 3 years in the final rule.
Description and Estimated Number of Small Entities Regulated
The final rule will apply to any business that manufactures, sells or leases, or installs manufactured homes. The rule also contains requirements for persons to qualify to provide the training required for installers. This rule also establishes requirements that must be met by a state to implement and administer its own installation program in such a way that the state would not be covered by the HUD administered installation program.
The rule has differing requirements for the regulated entities depending on whether the home is being installed in a state with a qualified installation program or a state covered by the HUD administered program.
The information presented in Table 2 was gathered from data
collected by the Office of Manufactured Housing Programs based on the
available data for 2006. The number of states expected to administer an
installation program is estimated based on close correspondence with state representatives regarding the state's intentions.
Table 2.Regulated Entities and Small Entities
Number of Small Business Percentage of
North American Industrial Description of regulated Administration Number of regulated
Classification Schedule primary entity entities size standard small entities entities
All StatesThe requirements in Subpart A are applicable in all states
321991....................... Manufacturers... 222 500 employees.. 198 89
453930....................... Retailers....... 5151 500 employees.. 5151 100
States Without Installation ProgramsThe requirements in Subparts B through H are applicable in these states
453930....................... Retailers....... 340 500 employees.. 340 100
238990....................... Installers...... 1021 $12 million.... 1021 100
611519....................... Trainers........ 50 $6 million..... 50 100 [[Page 35276]]
States With Installation ProgramsThe requirements in Subpart I are applicable in these states
States.......... 35 50,000 0 0
population.
Description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the final rule, including an estimate of the classes of small entities that will be subject to the requirement and the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report or record.
The final rule contains information collection requirements, installer licensing requirements, installer surety bond/insurance requirements, installation inspection requirements, installer trainer registration, and certification of states administering an installation program. Appendix A provides a detailed cost analysis of each section of the final rule.
Identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the final rule.
The Department is unaware of any conflicting federal rules. The final rule requires similar information to that required in 24 CFR 3282.552, which requires manufacturers to submit monthly label reports to their Production Inspection Primary Inspection Agency (IPIA). Section 3282.553 (24 CFR 3282.553) requires each IPIA to provide the information in the monthly label reports to the Department. This information is currently provided on OMBapproved form HUD302. Section 3286.9 in the final rule requires the manufacturer to provide similar information to the Department for the purposes of installation.
To eliminate the possible duplication of reporting requirements, the Department revised form HUD302 such that the information required in 24 CFR 3282.552 and 3286.9 may be provided in a single form completed by the manufacturer. This revised form is part of the Department's Paperwork Reduction Act submission.
Description of any significant alternatives that accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes that minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities, including alternatives considered.
The section Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public Comment discusses the five regulatory requirements in the proposed and final rules that have the greatest economic impact on small entities. Additional alternatives were also considered during the development of the final rule as a result of the public comment.
Alternative 1. Section 3286.5(b)(2) requires the manufacturer to include instructions for supporting the manufactured home temporarily, pending the first siting of the home for occupancy.
Alternative ConsideredThe Department considered eliminating this requirement as the result of public comment; however, the importance of assuring that the temporary supports will be sufficient to prevent the home and its transportable sections from being brought out of conformance with the Construction and Safety Standards in 24 CFR part 3280 prior to sale is a necessary consumer protection considering the small costs associated with this section. Furthermore, the Department received additional comments stating the provisions are beneficial and should remain in the final rule.
Alternative 2. Section 3286.7(b) requires the retailer to provide the purchaser or lessee with a consumer disclosure prior to the purchase or lease of a manufactured home.
Alternative ConsideredThe Department considered eliminating this requirement as a result of public comment; however, the majority of public comment was in favor of the disclosure because of the importance of consumer protection during the purchase or lease of a manufactured home. This consumer protection justifies the small costs associated with this section.
Alternative 3. Section 3286.9(d) of the proposed rule required the manufacturer to include installation instructions in each home regardless of state.
Alternative ConsideredA single commenter suggested requiring the manufacturer to provide installation instructions only in homes installed in states where HUD administers the installation program. Section 605 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5404) requires the manufacturer to provide the design and instructions for the installation of each manufactured home, that have been approved by a design approval inspection agency; therefore, the requirement is consistent with the statutory requirement. (See Sec. 3286.9(b) of the final rule.)
Alternative 4. Section 3286.13(a) of the proposed rule required the retailer or distributor to maintain for 5 years a copy of the sales or lease record for all homes sold or leased regardless of state.
Alternative ConsideredThe Department revised the final rule requiring the retailer or distributor to maintain a copy of the sales or lease record for homes sold or leased in states where HUD administers the installation program for 3 years (See section 3286.113(e) of the final rule). This reduces the recordkeeping burden on retailers and distributors.
Alternative 5. Section 3286.103(a) of the proposed rule required
retailers and distributors to provide the purchaser with a copy of either:
``(1) The manufacturer's DAPIAapproved installation instructions for the home; or
(2) If the installation requires a design that is different from
that provided by the manufacturer, an installation design and
instructions that do not take the home out of compliance with the
construction and safety standards in part 3280 of this chapter. * * *''
Many commenters agreed that the retailer should provide the
purchaser with a copy of the DAPIAapproved installation instructions
for every home in states where HUD administers the installation
program. However, many commenters said the retailer should not be
required to provide an installation design and instructions that differ
from the DAPIAapproved installation instruction if the retailer has
not agreed to provide any setup in connection with the sale of the home
and the installation requires a design that is different from that
provided by the manufacturer for the home. HUD agrees that the retailer
or manufacturer should provide the installation design and instructions
only for installations that require designs that differ from those provided by the manufacturer when the retailer or
[[Page 35277]]
manufacturer agrees to provide any setup in connection with the sale of
the home. The proposed rule placed the entire burden of providing the installation instructions on the retailer.
Accordingly, the final rule has been revised to require: (1) The retailer to provide the purchaser with a copy of the DAPIAapproved installation instructions for each manufactured home, and (2) the retailer or manufacturer to provide to the installer the installation design and instructions for installations that require designs that differ from those provided by the manufacturer, when the retailer or manufacturer agrees to provide any setup in connection with the sale of the home (See Sec. 3286.103(b) of the final rule).
Alternative 6. Section 3286.211(a) of the proposed rule set an expiration date of 3 years for installation licenses issued in states where HUD administers the installation program.
A single commenter suggested extending the term of the license to 5 years to reduce the burden on installers. Another commenter suggested reducing the licensing term to one year to ensure installers are knowledgeable of new installation requirements. The term of the license remains 3 years in the final rule to balance the burden on installers and HUD, while ensuring installers are kept up to date on updates to the Model Installation Standards.
Alternative 7. Record Retention RequirementsThe proposed rule requires that installers, retailers, and trainers maintain the required records for 5 years in states where HUD administers the installation program.
Alternative ConsideredThe Department agreed with the 15
commenters that suggested reducing the record retention requirement to
3 years. The Department agreed and changed the record retention
requirement to 3 years in the final rule, thereby reducing record retention burden on small entities.
[[Page 35278]]
Appendix A.24 CFR part 3286: Manufactured Housing Installation Program Cost Impact Analysis Matrix
Cost Cost Annual
Number of impact per impact per cost Total
Section Regulated party parties Number of single multi impact per annual Cost impact notes
affected homes section section regulated cost
home home party impact
Sec. 3286.1........... ................... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... This section sets forth the
purpose of Subpart A. The
requirements in Subpart A apply
to all manufactured homes
regardless of the state of
installation. There is no cost
associated with this section.
Sec. 3286.2........... ................... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... This section sets forth the
applicability of all subparts.
There is no cost associated with
this section.
Sec. 3286.3........... ................... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... This section sets forth terms and
definitions in this part. There
is no cost associated with this
section.
Sec. 3286.5........... Manufacturer....... 222 135,000 $0.87 $0.87 $527.03 $117,000 This section provides for an
overview of the installation
program including the HUD
installation program, state
installation programs, and
manufacturer and retailer
requirements. There is no
associated cost with this
section other than in Sec.
3286.5(c)(2). Section
3286.5(c)(2) requires the
manufacturer to include
instructions for supporting the
manufactured home temporarily
and protecting the interior from
damage, pending the first
installation of the home for
occupancy. The instructions must
be adequate to assure that the
temporary supports used will be
sufficient to prevent the home
and its transportable sections
from being brought out of
conformance with the
construction and safety
standards or its sections if
stored on such supports for more
than 30 days. This would include
costs for thirdparty design
review and approval (4 hours of
DAPIA review and approval
labor). The installation
instructions themselves are
already required under 24 CFR
3280. However, this review cost
is a onetime annualized total
cost averaged on a perhome
basis. The Department estimates
20 hours to review and revise
the instructions at $75 per hour
for 78 manuals. This cost is
averaged for 135,000 homes and
the 78 manuals. (20*75*78)/
135,000=$0.867/home.
Sec. 3286.7(a)........ Manufacturer....... 222 135,000 2.55 2.55 1,551.89 344,520 Requires the manufacturer to put
a notice in the consumer manual
for reinstalled homes. There
will be a cost to the
manufacturer for this notice.
This notice must be provided for
ALL homes. The cost to the
manufacturer would include the
one time cost of developing the
disclosure (one hour at $75 per
hour per manual), the initial
placement in the consumer manual
(one hour at $15 per hour per
manual), and the continued
placement of the disclosure in
the consumer manual (10 minutes
at $15 per hour). This cost is
averaged for 135,000
homes.{(1*75*78)+(1*15*78)+(0.16
67*15*135,000){time} /
135,000=$2.55/home.
Sec. 3286.7(b)........ Retailer........... 5151 135,000 5.36 5.36 140.52 723,825 Requires the retailer to provide
the purchaser or lessee with a
consumer disclosure. The
requirements of this disclosure
are also provided for in this
section. This notice must be
provided for all homes. There
will be a cost to the retailer
associated with this disclosure.
The cost to the retailer would
include the onetime cost of
developing the disclosure (one
hour at $75 per hour) and
providing the disclosure to the
consumer before the sale of each
home (10 minutes at $15 per
hour). This cost is averaged for
135,000 homes.
{(1*75*5151)+(0.1667*15*135,000)
{/135,000=$5.36/home. [[Page 35279]]
Sec. 3286.9(a)........ Manufacturer....... 222 135,000 2.50 2.50 1,520.27 337,500 This section requires
manufacturers to provide the
initial tracking information
about each home to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT William W. Matchneer III, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Affairs and Manufactured Housing, Office of Manufactured Housing Programs, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 9164, Washington, DC 20410; telephone number 2027086401 (this is not a tollfree number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service at 18008778339.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522