B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal Register document through the electronic docket at http:// www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's pilot eCFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr. C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPAHQOPP20060192 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or before September 2, 2008.

In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit this copy, identified by docket ID number EPAHQOPP20060192, by one of the following methods:

II. Petition for Tolerance

In the Federal Register of August 15, 2006 (71 FR 46911) (FRL8064 1), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 6F7022) by Syngenta Crop Protection Inc., P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27409. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.220 be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the herbicide atrazine, 2 chloro4ethylamino6isopropylaminostriazine, in or on leafy
vegetables (excluding brassica) at 0.60 parts per million (ppm). That notice referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection Inc., the registrant, which is available to the public in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. Comments were received on the notice of filing. EPA's response to these comments is discussed in Unit IV.C.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has concluded that a tolerance level of 0.25 ppm shall be established for the raw agricultural commodities vegetable, leafy, except brassica, group 4. The reason for these changes are explained in Unit IV.D. III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue....''

Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, and the factors specified in section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for the petitionedfor tolerances for residues of atrazine on vegetable, leafy, except brassica, group 4 at 0.25 ppm. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with establishing the tolerance were discussed in the Notice published in the Federal Register of June 21, 2006 (71 FR 35664) (FRL 80654) which made available the cumulative risk assessment for the chlorinated triazine pesticides, which include atrazine. The Agency concluded that the cumulative risks associated with the chlorinated triazine pesticides are below the Agency's level of concern. In the risk assessment for the inadvertant residues of atrazine on leafy vegetables, EPA concluded that the food related exposures to atrazine from leafy vegetables are insignificant. Thus, the atrazinerelated risks calculated in the triazine cumulative risk assessment will be unchanged by this action. The triazine cumulative risk assessment can be accessed at http://www.regulations.gov under docket identification (ID) number EPAHQOPP20050481. Based on the risk assessment discussed in the above notice, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate exposure to atrazine residues. IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

Adequate enforcement methodology (Syngenta Analytical Methods AG 601, AG484, AG564 (plants), Method III in Pam Vol. II (milk) and Method I in PAM Vol. II (meat)) is available to enforce the tolerance expression. The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 207555350; telephone number: (410) 3052905; email address: residuemethods@epa.gov. B. International Residue Limits

The Codex Alimentarius Commission has not proposed or established maximum residue limits (MRLs) for residues of atrazine in or on agricultural commodities.

C. Response to Comments

Several comments were received from a private citizen objecting to pesticide body load, animal testing, establishing tolerances, and pesticide residues. The Agency has received these same comments from this commenter on numerous previous occasions. Refer to the following Federal Register cites: 70 FR 37686, June 30, 2005; 70 FR 1354, January 7, 2005; 69 FR 6309663098 October 29, 2004; for the Agency's response to these objections.

D. Revisions to PetitionedFor Tolerances

Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has concluded that a tolerance level of 0.25 ppm on leafy vegetables (excluding brassica) is more appropriate than 0.60 ppm as it covers the maximum residue level found in the study submitted, while retaining the capability of detecting instances of misuse. The Agency is revising the raw agricultural commodities nomenclature for ``leafy vegetables (excluding brassica)'' to ``vegetable, leafy, except brassica, group 4.''

V. Conclusion

Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of atrazine, 2 chloro4ethylamino6isopropylaminostriazine, in or on vegetable, leafy, except brassica, group 4 at 0.25 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

This final rule establishes tolerances under section 408(d) of FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order
[[Page 37852]]
12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and LowIncome Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition, this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 1044).

This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: June 23, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180[AMENDed]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.220 is amended by adding text to paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.220 Atrazine; tolerances for residues.
* * * * *
(d) Indirect or inadvertant residues. Tolerances are established for indirect or inadvertant residues of atrazine, 2chloro4
ethylamino6isopropylaminostriazine, in or on the following raw agricultural commodity when present therein as a result of application of atrazine to the growing crops in paragraph (a) of this section: Commodity Parts per million Vegetable, leafy, except brassica, group 4........... 0.25 [FR Doc. E815010 Filed 7108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 656050S

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Hope Johnson, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 204600001; telephone number: (703) 3055410; email address: johnson.hope@epa.gov.