Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. 2007-3 CRB CD 2004-2005]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Distribution of the 2004 and 2005 Cable Royalty Funds
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges are announcing the commencement of a proceeding to determine the Phase I distribution of 2004 and 2005 royalties collected under the cable statutory license. The Judges are also announcing the date by which a party who wishes to participate in this distribution proceeding must file its Petition to Participate and the accompanying $150 filing fee.
SUMMARY: Distribution of the 2004 and 2005 Cable Royalty Funds,
Each year, semiannually, cable systems must submit royalty payments to the Copyright Office as required by the cable statutory license for the privilege of retransmitting overtheair television and radio broadcast signals. 17 U.S.C. 111. These royalties are then distributed to copyright owners whose works were included in such retransmissions and who timely filed a claim for royalties. Distribution of the royalties for each calendar year are determined by the Copyright Royalty Judges (``Judges'') in two phases. At Phase I, the royalties are divided among the representatives of the major categories of copyrightable content (movies, sports programming, music, etc.) requesting the distribution. At Phase II, the royalties are divided among the various copyright owners within each category.
This Notice announcing the commencement of a proceeding under 17 U.S.C. 803(b)(1) for distribution of cable royalties collected for 2004 and 2005 is confined to Phase I.
Consistent with 17 U.S.C. 804(b)(8), the Copyright Royalty Judges determine that a Phase I controversy exists as to the distribution of the 2004 and 2005 cable royalties. We reach this determination, in this instance, for two reasons. First, several interested parties have represented to us that a Phase I controversy exists for these years. See Petition to Declare Controversy and Initiate a Phase I Proceeding for the Distribution of the 2004 and 2005 Cable Royalty Funds filed by the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (``MPAA'') (filed July 16, 2007); and comments filed by the following parties in Docket No. 20073 CRB CD 20042005: Independent Producers Group (filed February 28, 2008); a comment filed jointly by Program Suppliers, Joint Sports Claimants, Public Television Claimants, National Association of Broadcasters, American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Broadcast Music, Inc., SESAC, Inc., National Public Radio and Canadian Claimants Group (filed February 29, 2008). Second, to date we have not received notification that any settlements have been reached for either of these years, nor have we received motions for final distribution.
The Judges are consolidating the 2004 and 2005 royalty years into a
single proceeding. We note that the Librarian routinely consolidated
multiple royalty years into a single proceeding in order to maximize the efficiencies associated
[[Page 40624]]
with the distribution process. We see no reason to deviate from this
practice in this instance because there appear to be no unusual issues
associated with these years that would make a consolidated proceeding
unduly complex. See MPAA Petition to Declare a Controversy at 2
(``anticipate that same, or closely similar, issues will be presented
for both years''). Therefore, consolidation of these two years
represents the most administratively efficient manner in which to determine the distribution of these royalty funds.
Petitions to Participate must be filed in accordance with Sec.
351.1(b) of the Judges' regulations. See 37 CFR 351.1(b). Petitions to
Participate submitted by interested parties whose claims do not exceed
$1,000 \1\ must contain a statement that the party will not seek a
distribution of more than $1,000. No filing fee is required for these
parties. We note, however, that interested parties with claims
exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) must submit a filing fee of one
hundred and fifty dollars ($150) with their Petition to Participate or
it will be rejected. Cash will not be accepted; therefore, parties must
pay the filing fee with a check or money order made payable to the
``Copyright Royalty Board.'' If a check is returned for lack of
sufficient funds, the corresponding Petition to Participate will be dismissed.
\1\ The Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections
Act, Public Law No. 109303, changed the amount from $10,000 to $1,000.
Further procedural matters, including scheduling, will be addressed after Petitions to Participate have been received.
Note that in accordance with 37 CFR 350.2 (Representation), only
attorneys who are members of the bar in one or more states and in good
standing will be allowed to represent parties before the Copyright
Royalty Judges, unless the party is an individual who represents herself or himself.
Dated: July 10, 2008.
James Scott Sledge,
Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
[FR Doc. E816137 Filed 71408; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 141072P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT LaKeshia Brent, CRB Program Specialist, by telephone at (202) 7077658 or email at crb@loc.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020