Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Petition for Modification
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977 and 30 CFR Part 44 govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification. This notice is a summary of
a petition for modification filed by the party listed below to modify
the application of the existing mandatory safety standard published in [[Page 47981]]
Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SUMMARY: Petition for Modification of Existing Mandatory Safety Standard,
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary determines that: (1) An
alternative method of achieving the result of such standard exists
which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of
protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or (2)
that the application of such standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in such mine. In addition, the
regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modifications.
II. Petition for Modification
Docket Number: M2008001M.
Petitioner: EP Minerals, LLC, an EaglePicher Company, 2360 Grahamm Blvd., Vale, Oregon 97918.
Mine: Clark Mill, MSHA I.D. 2600677, located in Storey County, Nevada; Colado Plant, MSHA I.D. No. 2600680, located in Pershing County, Nevada; and Celatom Plant, MSHA I.D. No. 3503236, located in Malheur County, Oregon.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 56.20001 (Intoxicating beverages and narcotics).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the use of beer in their laboratories to
test a filtration product used by breweries. The laboratory tests are
performed by dissolving the product in degassed beer to ensure that it
will not affect the breweries' product. The petitioner states that: (1)
Their beer is ordered by the leading lab technician or other
responsible party, purchased at the local grocery outlet by their
purchaser, taken to the lab and stored in a back room, and accessible
to only a few authorized people; and (2) the beer is closely tracked to
determine how much is on hand and how much is used. The petitioner
asserts that the proposed alternative method will provide the same degree of safety as the existing standard.
Lawrence D. Reynolds,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. E818924 Filed 81408; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 451043P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Lawrence D. Reynolds, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances at 202693 9449 (Voice), reynolds.lawrence@dol.gov (Email), or 2026939441 (Telefax), or contact Barbara Barron at 2026939447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov (Email), or 2026939441 (Telefax). [These are not tollfree numbers.]
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020