Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-58436; File No. SR-DTC-2008-11]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Implement a New Service to Allow Issuers To Track and Limit the Number of Beneficial Owners for an Individual CUSIP
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: August 27, 2008.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on August 6, 2008, The
Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
primarily by DTC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the rule change is to implement a new service that
will allow issuers, either themselves or through an issuerdesignated
administrator, to track and limit the number of beneficial owners for
an individual CUSIP. This service would be called the Security Holder Tracking Service (``SH Tracking Service'').
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, DTC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. DTC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
A group of investment banks requested that DTC assist them in
providing greater liquidity and access to capital for securities of closely held
[[Page 51871]]
issuers that are traded in private equities markets.\2\ Specifically,
this group asked DTC to build a system that would allow these closely
held securities to be eligible for DTC's depository services while
allowing the issuer, typically through an agent, to monitor and control
the number and character (e.g., qualified institutional buyers or
``QIBs'') of beneficial owners of its securities.\3\ Currently, the
processing and settlement of transactions of such issues is accomplished in a physical environment outside DTC.\4\
\2\ Among the securities at issue are those that are commonly
referred to as ``Rule 144A securities.'' These securities are
transacted pursuant to the terms of Rule 144A (17 CFR 230.144A),
which provides a safe harbor from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. 15 U.S.C. 77e.
\3\ Issuers must control the number of beneficial owners pursuant to certain regulatory registration and reporting
requirements. In order for issuers to be able to avoid the periodic
reporting requirements imposed by the Act they must not have more
than 500 beneficial owners. 15 U.S.C. 78l(g), 15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 15 U.S.C. 78o(d).
\4\ DTC already allows Rule 144A securities that are not
investment grade rated debt to be eligible for deposit, bookentry
delivery, and other depository services only if the Rule 144A
securities are designated for inclusion in a system of a self
regulatory organization approved by the Commission for the reporting
of quotation and trade information of Rule 144A transactions (``SRO
system''). Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33327 (Dec. 13, 1993); 58 FR 67878 (Dec. 22, 1993).
DTC proposes to implement its new SH Tracking Service that would facilitate the bookentry settlement and asset servicing for securities that are privately transacted. This service would allow issuers to track and limit the number of beneficial owners of its securities (``Tracked Securities'').
The eligibility process for a Tracked Security to be made and
remain DTCeligible would not change from DTC's current process.
However, under the new proposed system, DTC would be requested in
writing to set up a specific CUSIP for tracking such securities \5\ and
would be notified who will perform the function of the issuer's
administrator for the CUSIP in the SH Tracking Service.\6\ Upon receipt
of all of such documentation, DTC would make the CUSIP DTCeligible and
would activate the tracking indicator on its security master file.
Additionally, once it is made eligible, DTC would perform asset servicing for the issue.
\5\ DTC anticipates that this instruction will come from the
underwriter at the time of the initial distribution at DTC.
\6\ DTC anticipates that the issuer's transfer agent will serve as its administrator.
The issuer's administrator would control movements of the particular CUSIP for which it had been appointed. Once the tracking indicator has been activated on the master file and the Administrator has been appointed, no transfer of the securities would take place in the Tracked Security without the approval of the administrator through DTC's Inventory Management System (``IMS''). The administrator, based on requirements of the issuer, would be solely responsible for determining whether a transaction should be effected in DTC. Once approved by the administrator, DTC would perform centralized bookentry settlement. IMS would only allow an administrator access to view and approve transactions for CUSIPs for which it had been appointed administrator as reflected in DTC's records.
Because DTC would be relying solely on the instructions of the administrator in order to effect settlement in Tracked Securities and would have no knowledge of the number or character of the underlying beneficial owners, use of the SH Tracking Service by any party would constitute an agreement that DTC shall not be liable for any loss or damages related to the use of the SH Tracking System. Each user of the SH Tracking Service would agree to indemnify and hold harmless DTC and its affiliates from and against any and all losses, damages, liabilities, costs, judgments, charges, and expenses arising out of or relating to the use of the SH Tracking Service.
The Tracked Securities would not be held as part of a Participant's general free account and would not be considered eligible collateral in DTC's settlement system.
Although the SH Tracking Service was developed to address the specific concerns of Rule144A securities, in practice DTC envisions that it could be utilized for other types of securities for which the number or character of the beneficial owners requires some level of control.
In an effort to recover the costs of building the SH Tracking
Service, DTC proposes the following fees to be added to its Fee Schedule:
DTC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of section 17A of the Act \7\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder as it allows for more efficient processing of
transactions that are currently being effected outside of DTC by
physical processing. Therefore, it will not adversely affect the
safeguarding of funds or securities in DTC's custody and control or for which it is responsible.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q1.
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
DTC has not solicited or received written comments relating to the
proposed rule change. DTC will notify the Commission of any written comments it receives.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within thirtyfive days of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the
Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so
finding or (ii) as to which the selfregulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E820612 Filed 9408; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
SUMMARY: Depository Trust Co.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: August 27, 2008.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on August 6, 2008, The
Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
primarily by DTC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the rule change is to implement a new service that
will allow issuers, either themselves or through an issuerdesignated
administrator, to track and limit the number of beneficial owners for
an individual CUSIP. This service would be called the Security Holder Tracking Service (``SH Tracking Service'').
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, DTC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. DTC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
A group of investment banks requested that DTC assist them in
providing greater liquidity and access to capital for securities of closely held
[[Page 51871]]
issuers that are traded in private equities markets.\2\ Specifically,
this group asked DTC to build a system that would allow these closely
held securities to be eligible for DTC's depository services while
allowing the issuer, typically through an agent, to monitor and control
the number and character (e.g., qualified institutional buyers or
``QIBs'') of beneficial owners of its securities.\3\ Currently, the
processing and settlement of transactions of such issues is accomplished in a physical environment outside DTC.\4\
\2\ Among the securities at issue are those that are commonly
referred to as ``Rule 144A securities.'' These securities are
transacted pursuant to the terms of Rule 144A (17 CFR 230.144A),
which provides a safe harbor from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. 15 U.S.C. 77e.
\3\ Issuers must control the number of beneficial owners pursuant to certain regulatory registration and reporting
requirements. In order for issuers to be able to avoid the periodic
reporting requirements imposed by the Act they must not have more
than 500 beneficial owners. 15 U.S.C. 78l(g), 15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 15 U.S.C. 78o(d).
\4\ DTC already allows Rule 144A securities that are not
investment grade rated debt to be eligible for deposit, bookentry
delivery, and other depository services only if the Rule 144A
securities are designated for inclusion in a system of a self
regulatory organization approved by the Commission for the reporting
of quotation and trade information of Rule 144A transactions (``SRO
system''). Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33327 (Dec. 13, 1993); 58 FR 67878 (Dec. 22, 1993).
DTC proposes to implement its new SH Tracking Service that would facilitate the bookentry settlement and asset servicing for securities that are privately transacted. This service would allow issuers to track and limit the number of beneficial owners of its securities (``Tracked Securities'').
The eligibility process for a Tracked Security to be made and
remain DTCeligible would not change from DTC's current process.
However, under the new proposed system, DTC would be requested in
writing to set up a specific CUSIP for tracking such securities \5\ and
would be notified who will perform the function of the issuer's
administrator for the CUSIP in the SH Tracking Service.\6\ Upon receipt
of all of such documentation, DTC would make the CUSIP DTCeligible and
would activate the tracking indicator on its security master file.
Additionally, once it is made eligible, DTC would perform asset servicing for the issue.
\5\ DTC anticipates that this instruction will come from the
underwriter at the time of the initial distribution at DTC.
\6\ DTC anticipates that the issuer's transfer agent will serve as its administrator.
The issuer's administrator would control movements of the particular CUSIP for which it had been appointed. Once the tracking indicator has been activated on the master file and the Administrator has been appointed, no transfer of the securities would take place in the Tracked Security without the approval of the administrator through DTC's Inventory Management System (``IMS''). The administrator, based on requirements of the issuer, would be solely responsible for determining whether a transaction should be effected in DTC. Once approved by the administrator, DTC would perform centralized bookentry settlement. IMS would only allow an administrator access to view and approve transactions for CUSIPs for which it had been appointed administrator as reflected in DTC's records.
Because DTC would be relying solely on the instructions of the administrator in order to effect settlement in Tracked Securities and would have no knowledge of the number or character of the underlying beneficial owners, use of the SH Tracking Service by any party would constitute an agreement that DTC shall not be liable for any loss or damages related to the use of the SH Tracking System. Each user of the SH Tracking Service would agree to indemnify and hold harmless DTC and its affiliates from and against any and all losses, damages, liabilities, costs, judgments, charges, and expenses arising out of or relating to the use of the SH Tracking Service.
The Tracked Securities would not be held as part of a Participant's general free account and would not be considered eligible collateral in DTC's settlement system.
Although the SH Tracking Service was developed to address the specific concerns of Rule144A securities, in practice DTC envisions that it could be utilized for other types of securities for which the number or character of the beneficial owners requires some level of control.
In an effort to recover the costs of building the SH Tracking
Service, DTC proposes the following fees to be added to its Fee Schedule:
DTC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of section 17A of the Act \7\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder as it allows for more efficient processing of
transactions that are currently being effected outside of DTC by
physical processing. Therefore, it will not adversely affect the
safeguarding of funds or securities in DTC's custody and control or for which it is responsible.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q1.
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
DTC has not solicited or received written comments relating to the
proposed rule change. DTC will notify the Commission of any written comments it receives.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within thirtyfive days of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the
Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so
finding or (ii) as to which the selfregulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E820612 Filed 9408; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020