Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. FR-5084-P-01]
RIN ID: RIN 2501-AD24
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Revision of Hearing Procedures
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This proposed rule would amend the hearing procedures before hearing officers who have the responsibility for adjudicating those matters that do not raise issues under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). This proposed rule would also amend the hearing procedures before Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) who have the responsibility for adjudicating those matters that are subject to the requirements of the APA. Specifically, the proposed rule would modify pleading and motion requirements of the hearing procedures. It would also amend the discovery and deposition requirements to clarify the hearing officers' discovery procedures and to specifically allow for written interrogatories, in addition to depositions, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions. A new provision allowing for written interrogatories would be added to the hearing procedures, and the proposed rule would also modify the procedures for the review of hearing officers' determinations. Additionally, the proposed rule would amend the discovery, appeal, and judicial review procedures related to hearings that are conducted pursuant to the APA. The proposed changes to the regulations would better reflect current practice and would conform the regulations more closely to statutory requirements.
SUMMARY: Housing and Urban Development Department,
HUD's regulations implementing rules of procedure for hearings are located at 24 CFR part 26. Subpart A of part 26 applies to those hearing procedures before hearing officers who have the responsibility for adjudicating those matters that do not raise issues under the APA. HUD utilizes these rules of procedure with respect to determinations by the Multifamily Participation Review Committee, to: (1) Hearings conducted pursuant to referrals by debarring or suspending officials under 2 CFR part 2424; (2) hearings conducted pursuant to 24 CFR 17.15017.170; and (3) other administrative disputes. Subpart B of part 26 applies to those hearing procedures before ALJs who have the responsibility for adjudicating those matters that are subject to the requirements of the APA.
This proposed rule would amend HUD's hearing procedures to reflect
current practice and to more closely conform to applicable statutes;
the hearing provisions of the APA; and parts 25, 28, and 30 of this
title. Additionally, the sections would be reordered to better track
the normal course of a hearing conducted under this part. The sections would be revised as follows:
Current part 26 Proposed part 26 26.1 26.1
26.2 26.2
26.3 26.4
26.4 26.3
26.5 26.5
26.6 26.6
26.7 26.7
26.8 26.8
26.9 26.12
26.10 26.13
26.11 26.14
26.12 26.15
26.13 26.16
26.14 26.9
26.15 26.10
26.16 26.11
26.17 26.18
26.18 26.20
26.19 26.19
26.20 26.22
26.21 26.17
26.22 26.23
26.23 26.24
26.24 26.25
26.25 26.26
26.26 26.27
26.27 26.28
26.28 26.29
26.29 26.32
26.30 26.33
26.31 26.35
26.32 26.36
26.33 26.37
[[Page 52113]]
26.34 26.31
26.35 26.30
26.36 26.34
26.37 26.38
26.38 26.40
26.39 26.41
26.40 26.39
26.41 26.42
26.42 26.43
26.43 26.44
26.44 26.45
26.45 26.46
26.46 26.47
26.47 26.49
26.48 26.48
26.49 26.50
26.50 26.52
26.51 26.53
26.52 26.54
26.53 26.55
This section of the preamble discusses the proposed regulatory changes.
Subpart A of part 26 contains the procedures for hearings before hearing officers. This proposed rule would amend subpart A to make the following revisions:
In Sec. 26.1, the proposed rule would remove references to hearings conducted in matters arising under 24 CFR part 25, since those hearings would now be conducted in accordance with the provisions of subpart B of this part. A new paragraph (10) would be added to Sec. 26.2 to clarify that the hearing officer shall have the authority necessary to carry out the duties of the hearing officer conducting hearings under this subpart.
The title of the newly designated Sec. 26.4 would be changed to ``Sanctions'' to more clearly indicate the section contents and would be revised to include more specific guidance on the imposition of sanctions. For clarity and ease of use, Sec. 26.5 would be divided into several paragraphs. Section 26.6 would be clarified to state that the attorneys within the Office of General Counsel will serve as the Department's representatives.
Newly designated Sec. 26.9 would be divided into several paragraphs and minor changes would be made to clarify the form and filing requirements. Additionally, redesignated Sec. 26.10 would be revised to update the methods and clarify the provisions concerning service. Newly designated Sec. 26.11 would be revised to more closely track the similar provisions in subpart B.
The newly designated Sec. 26.13 would be amended to provide the hearing officer with additional flexibility to designate a time period within which a complaint must be served and would be revised to clarify that the complaint must set forth both the factual and legal grounds for the action.
Newly designated Sec. 26.14 would be broken into sections for clarity. Redesignated Sec. 26.15 would clarify that Respondents may amend without leave under the provisions of amendment by right in paragraph (a).
The newly designated Sec. 26.16 would be amended to state that, whenever possible, requests for action by the hearing officer should be made by motion. This revised section would also revise the name of the response to the motion for clarity and would extend the time period for response to 10 days. Additionally, this revised section would more clearly provide for motions to extend deadlines, would allow for the submission of proposed orders with written motions, would clarify the provisions concerning extensions of time, and would specifically provide for motions for summary judgment.
The discovery provisions in redesignated Sec. Sec. 26.1826.22 would be revised to more closely track the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which have always been used as guidance in the conduct of hearings under this part. Specifically, the redesignated Sec. 26.18 would revise and expand the discovery provisions to allow the use of written interrogatories, in addition to depositions, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions. The newly designated Sec. Sec. 26.19 and 26.20 would be revised to incorporate more definite requirements for requesting the production of documents and for depositions and objections to depositions. A new Sec. 26.21 would be added to allow for a limited number of interrogatories in discovery. The redesignated Sec. 26.22 would be revised to clarify the procedure for objections to admissions of facts and documents, and the title of that section would be changed to ``Requests for admissions'' to more clearly indicate the section contents.
The newly designated Sec. 26.24 would be revised to encourage the parties to enter into stipulations whenever possible. Redesignated Sec. 26.25 would clarify: (1) That the hearing officer's determination and order is final unless a party timely appeals it in accordance with redesignated Sec. 26.26, and (2) would require the determination to provide information on such review, if any. The redesignated Sec. 26.26 would modify the provisions regarding Secretarial review of the determinations of hearing officers by specifically providing that the Debarring Official shall have authority to review determinations in suspension and debarment proceedings, not the Secretary, by incorporating more detailed requirements for the briefs both in support of and in opposition to the appeal and by providing for the Secretary's discretion to extend deadlines. Furthermore, redesignated Sec. 26.26 would include additional provisions about evidence in the record and ex parte communications, and combine and expand upon provisions concerning the final, written determination.
Redesignated Sec. 26.27 would be broken down into sections, for clarity.
B. Amendments to Subpart BHearings Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act
Subpart B of part 26 contains the procedures for hearings conducted on the record pursuant to the APA. This proposed rule would amend subpart B to make the following revisions:
The redesignated Sec. 26.29 will include a definition of ``Respondent'' in the regulations and would modify the title of the docket clerk.
A new subheading titled ``Administrative Law Judge'' would be inserted before the newly designated Sec. 26.32. The newly designated Sec. 26.32 would be revised to redesignate paragraph (n) as (o) and to include a new paragraph (n) clarifying the ALJ's authority to extend deadlines. Minor clarifications to the specific language of the section would be made to the new Sec. Sec. 26.34 and 26.35.
A new subheading titled ``Parties'' would be inserted before the redesignated Sec. 26.36.
Redesignated Sec. 26.38 would require the complaint to be filed with the Office of Administrative Law Judges upon issuance and would require the Respondent's response to be filed with the same office, with a copy served upon the Department in accordance with the procedures set forth in the complaint.
Redesignated Sec. 26.40 would be revised to specifically provide
for motions for summary judgment, would be revised to extend the time
period for response to a motion to 10 days, and would more clearly
provide for motions for time extensions. The newly designated Sec.
26.42 would be amended to include more specific provisions for conduct
of discovery under this subpart. As a result, the discovery procedures
of subpart B will substantially conform to those of subpart A, and
parties will be able to understand all applicable discovery procedures without having to reference the Federal Rules of Civil
[[Page 52114]]
Procedure. Additionally, Sec. 26.42 would provide that in discovery in
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (PFCRA) actions, the defendant may
review documents that relate to the allegations set out in the complaint.
The redesignated Sec. 26.44 would be divided into additional paragraphs for clarity. The newly designated Sec. 26.45 would be amended to clarify the commencement dates and location of the hearing in PFCRA matters. Redesignated Sec. 26.47 would be revised to provide additional guidance and clarity.
Section 26.49 would be amended to require that the hearing be recorded by a HUDdesignated reporter and that the parties may obtain copies of the transcript.
Section 26.50(a) would clarify that the initial decision of the ALJ does not become effective unless it becomes final agency action on its own under Sec. 26.50(c) or 26.52(l) or if it is incorporated into the final agency action by the Secretary's decision under Sec. 26.52(l). Redesignated Sec. 26.52 would be amended to provide that all parties may request Secretarial review of determinations in PFCRA matters. Redesignated Sec. 26.52 would also be amended to incorporate more detailed requirements for the briefs both in support of and in opposition to the appeal, to provide for the discretion to extend deadlines, and to combine and expand upon provisions concerning the final written decision.
A new Sec. 26.51 would establish procedures for seeking interlocutory Secretarial review of the rulings of an ALJ by motion for certification or by petition to the Secretary.
Redesignated Sec. 26.54 would be revised to eliminate the
prohibition that the Government cannot seek judicial review of an
adverse determination in PFCRA matters. The revision would bring the
Government's right to review into conformity with that in nonPFCRA matters.
III. Small Business Concerns Related to Board Enforcement Actions
With respect to enforcement actions undertaken pursuant to the
procedures provided in this proposed rule, HUD is cognizant that
section 222 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
of 1996 (Pub. L. 104121) (SBREFA) requires the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman to ``work with each agency
with regulatory authority over small businesses to ensure that small
business concerns that receive or are subject to an audit, onsite
inspection, compliance assistance effort, or other enforcement related
communication or contact by agency personnel are provided with a means
to comment on the enforcement activity conducted by this personnel.'' To implement this statutory provision, the Small Business
Administration has requested that federal agencies include the
following language on agency publications and notices that are provided
to small business concerns at the time the enforcement action is undertaken. The language is as follows:
The Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were established to receive comments from small businesses about federal agency enforcement actions. The Ombudsman will annually evaluate the enforcement activities and rate each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on the enforcement actions of [insert agency name], you will find the necessary comment forms at www.sba.gov/ombudsman or call 1888REGFAIR (18887343247).
In accordance with its notice describing HUD's actions on the implementation of SBREFA, which was published on May 21, 1998 (63 FR 28214), HUD will include the language cited above on notices implementing enforcement actions, to ensure that small entities have the full means to comment on the enforcement activity conducted by HUD. IV. Findings and Certifications
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule would clarify pleading, discovery, and motion requirements that apply to hearings before HUD hearing officers and ALJs, respectively, by codifying current practice and by eliminating the need for parties to refer to outside sources, such as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for routine requirements. Procedures that apply to parties in matters adjudicated in such hearings will not change significantly as a result of this rule, whether or not parties are small entities. These revisions impose no significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the undersigned certifies that this rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Notwithstanding HUD's determination that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
HUD specifically invites comments regarding less burdensome alternatives to this rule that will meet HUD's program
responsibilities.
This proposed rule does not direct, provide for assistance or loan and mortgage insurance for, or otherwise govern or regulate, real property acquisition, disposition, leasing, rehabilitation, alteration, demolition, or new construction, or establish, revise, or provide for standards for construction or construction materials, manufactured housing, or occupancy. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this proposed rule is categorically excluded from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, an agency from promulgating a regulation that has federalism implications and either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and is not required by statute, or preempts state law, unless the relevant requirements of Section 6 of the Executive Order are met. This rule does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 15311538) establishes requirements for federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and
tribal governments and the private sector. This proposed rule would not
impose any federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal government or the private sector within the meaning of UMRA.
List of Subjects for 24 CFR Part 26
Administrative practice and procedure.
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the preamble, HUD proposes to revise 24 CFR part 26 to read as follows:
[[Page 52115]]
PART 26HEARING PROCEDURES
Subpart AHearings Before Hearing Officers
Sec.
26.1 Purpose and scope.
Hearing Officer
26.2 Hearing officer, powers, and duties.
26.3 Ex parte communications.
26.4 Sanctions.
26.5 Disqualification of hearing officer.
Representation of the Parties
26.6 Department representative.
26.7 Respondent's representative.
26.8 Standards of practice.
Pleadings and Motions
26.9 Form and filing requirements.
26.10 Service.
26.11 Time computation.
26.12 Notice of administrative action.
26.13 Complaint.
26.14 Answer.
26.15 Amendments and supplemental pleadings.
26.16 Motions.
Discovery
26.17 Prehearing conference.
26.18 Discovery.
26.19 Request for production of documents.
26.20 Depositions.
26.21 Written interrogatories.
26.22 Requests for admissions.
Hearings
26.23 Public nature and timing of hearings; transcripts.
26.24 Rules of evidence.
26.25 Hearing officer's determination and order.
Secretarial Review
26.26 Review of determination of hearing officers.
26.27 Interlocutory rulings.
Subpart BHearings Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act 26.28 Purpose and scope.
26.29 Definitions.
26.30 Service and filing.
26.31 Time computations.
Administrative Law Judge
26.32 Powers and duties of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). 26.33 Ex parte communications.
26.34 Sanctions.
26.35 Disqualification of ALJ.
Parties
26.36 Parties to the hearing.
26.37 Separation of functions.
Prehearing Procedures
26.38 Commencement of action.
26.39 Prehearing conferences.
26.40 Motions.
26.41 Default.
Discovery
26.42 Discovery.
26.43 Subpoenas.
26.44 Protective orders.
Hearings
26.45 General.
26.46 Witnesses.
26.47 Evidence.
26.48 Posthearing briefs.
26.49 The record.
26.50 Initial decision.
26.51 Interlocutory rulings.
26.52 Appeal to the Secretary.
26.53 Exhaustion of administrative remedies.
26.54 Judicial review.
26.55 Collection of civil penalties and assessments.
26.56 Right to administrative offset.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
Subpart AHearings Before Hearing Officers
This part sets forth rules of procedure in certain proceedings of
the Department of Housing and Urban Development presided over by a
hearing officer. These rules of procedure apply to administrative
sanction hearings pursuant to 2 CFR part 2424 and to hearings with
respect to determinations by the Multifamily Participation Review
Committee pursuant to 24 CFR part 200, subpart H, to the extent that
these regulations are not inconsistent and unless these regulations
provide otherwise. They also apply in any other case where a hearing is
required by statute or regulation, to the extent that rules adopted under such statute or regulation are not inconsistent.
Hearing Officer
Sec. 26.2 Hearing officer, powers, and duties.
(a) Hearing officer. Proceedings conducted under these rules shall
be presided over by a hearing officer who shall be an Administrative
Law Judge or Office of Appeals Administrative Judge authorized by the
Secretary or designee to conduct proceedings under this part.
(b) Time and place of hearing. The hearing officer shall set the
time and place of any hearing and shall give reasonable notice to the parties.
(c) Powers of hearing officers. The hearing officer shall conduct a
fair and impartial hearing and take all action necessary to avoid delay
in the disposition of proceedings and to maintain order. The hearing
officer shall have all powers necessary to those ends, including, but not limited to, the power:
(1) To administer oaths and affirmations;
(2) To cause subpoenas to be issued as authorized by law; (3) To rule upon offers of proof and receive evidence;
(4) To order or limit discovery as the interests of justice may require;
(5) To regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of the parties and their counsel;
(6) To hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties;
(7) To consider and rule upon all procedural and other motions appropriate in adjudicative proceedings;
(8) To take notice of any material fact not appearing in evidence
in the record that is properly a matter of judicial notice; (9) To make and file determinations; and
(10) To exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out
the responsibilities of the hearing officer under subpart A of this part.
Sec. 26.3 Ex parte communications.
(a) Definition. An ex parte communication is any communication with
a hearing officer, direct or indirect, oral or written, concerning the
merits or procedures of any pending proceeding that is made by a party in the absence of any other party.
(b) Prohibition of ex parte communications. Ex parte communications are prohibited except where:
(1) The purpose and content of the communication have been disclosed in advance or simultaneously to all parties; or
(2) The communication is a request for information concerning the status of the case.
(c) Procedure after receipt of ex parte communication. Any hearing
officer who receives an ex parte communication that the hearing officer
knows or has reason to believe is unauthorized shall promptly place the
communication, or its substance, in all files and shall furnish copies
to all parties. Unauthorized ex parte communications shall not be taken into consideration in deciding any matter in issue.
Sec. 26.4 Sanctions.
(a) The hearing officer may sanction a person, including any party
or representative, for failing to comply with an order, rule, or
procedure governing the proceeding; failing to prosecute or defend an
action; or engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
(b) Any sanction, including, but not limited to, those listed in
paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
(c) If a party refuses or fails to comply with an order of the hearing officer,
[[Page 52116]]
including an order compelling discovery, the hearing officer may enter
any appropriate order necessary to the disposition of the hearing
including a determination against the noncomplying party, including but not limited to, the following:
(1) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
(2) In the case of requests for admission, regard each matter about which an admission is requested to be admitted;
(3) Prohibit the party failing to comply with the order from
introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon, testimony relating to the information sought; or
(4) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with the order.
(d) If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action brought under
subpart A of this part, the hearing officer may dismiss the action or
may issue an initial decision against the nonprosecuting or defending party.
(e) The hearing officer may refuse to consider any motion, request,
response, brief, or other document that is not filed in a timely fashion.
Sec. 26.5 Disqualification of hearing officer.
(a) When a hearing officer believes there is a basis for
disqualification in a particular proceeding, the hearing officer shall
withdraw by notice on the record and shall notify the Secretary and the official initiating the action under appeal.
(b) Whenever any party believes that the hearing officer should be
disqualified from presiding in a particular proceeding, the party may
file a motion with the hearing officer requesting the hearing officer
to withdraw from presiding over the proceedings. This motion shall be
supported by affidavits setting forth the alleged grounds for disqualification.
(c) Upon the filing of a motion and affidavit, the hearing officer shall proceed no further in the case until the matter of
disqualification is resolved.
(d) If the hearing officer does not withdraw, a written statement
of his or her reasons shall be incorporated in the record and the
hearing shall proceed, unless the decision is appealed in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 26.27.
Representation of the Parties
In each case heard before a hearing officer under this part, the Department shall be represented by attorneys from the Office of General Counsel.
The party against whom the administrative action is taken may be represented at hearing, as follows:
(a) Individuals may appear on their own behalf;
(b) A member of a partnership or joint venture may appear on behalf of the partnership or joint venture;
(c) A bona fide officer may appear on behalf of a corporation or association upon a showing of adequate authorization;
(d) An attorney who files a notice of appearance with the hearing
officer may represent any party. For purposes of this paragraph, an
attorney is defined as a member of the bar of a federal court or of the
highest court of any state or territory of the United States; or
(e) An individual not included within paragraphs (a) through (d) of
this section may represent the respondent upon an adequate showing, as
determined by the hearing officer, that the individual possesses the
legal, technical, or other qualifications necessary to advise and assist in the presentation of the case.
Attorneys shall conform to the standards of professional and
ethical conduct required of practitioners in the courts of the United
States and by the bars of which the attorneys are members. Any attorney
may be prohibited by the hearing officer from representing a party if
the attorney is not qualified under Sec. 26.7 or if such action is
necessary to maintain order in or the integrity of the pending proceeding.
Pleadings and Motions
Sec. 26.9 Form and filing requirements.
(a) Filing. Unless otherwise provided by statute, rule, or regulation:
(1) Requests for hearings shall be filed with the Office of General
Counsel's Docket Clerk, Department of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410. The OGC Docket Clerk
shall assign the docket number and forward the case to HUD's Office of Appeals.
(2) All other pleadings, submissions, and documents should be filed directly with the appropriate hearing officer.
(3) Filing may be made by first class mail, delivery, facsimile
transmission, or electronic means; however, the hearing officer may
place reasonable limits on filing by facsimile or electronic means.
Duplicate copies are not required unless so ordered by the hearing
officer. A document is considered timely filed if postmarked on or
before the date due or delivered to the appropriate person by the date due.
(b) Title. Documents shall show clearly the title of the action and the docket number assigned by the Docket Clerk.
(c) Form. To the fullest extent possible, all documents shall be printed or typewritten in clear, legible form.
Sec. 26.10 Service.
(a) Method of Service. One copy of all pleadings, motions, and
other documents required or permitted under these rules shall be served
upon all parties by the person filing them and shall be accompanied by
a certificate of service stating how and when such service has been
made. Whenever these rules require or permit service to be made upon a
party represented by an attorney, the service shall be made upon the
attorney, unless service upon the party is ordered by the hearing
officer. Service shall be made by delivery, by first class mail or
overnight delivery to that person's last known address, by facsimile
transmission, or by electronic means; however, the hearing officer may
place reasonable limits on service by facsimile transmission or
electronic means. Delivery of a copy within this rule means: Handing it
to the person to be served; or leaving it at that person's office with
a clerk or other person in charge; or, if there is no one in charge,
leaving it in a conspicuous place in the office; or, if the office is
closed or the person to be served has no office, leaving it at that
person's residence or usual place of abode with some person of suitable
age and discretion who resides there. Service by mail, overnight
delivery, facsimile transmission, or electronic means is complete upon
deposit in a mail box, or upon posting, or upon electronic transmission.
(b) Proof of Service. Proof of service shall not be required unless
the fact of service is put in issue by appropriate motion or objection
on the part of the person allegedly served. In these cases, service may
be established by written receipt signed by or on behalf of the person
to be served, or may be established prima facie by affidavit,
certificate of service of mailing, or electronic receipt of sending. Sec. 26.11 Time computation.
(a) Generally. Computation of any period of time prescribed or
allowed by this part shall begin with the first business day following
the day on which the act, event, development, or default initiating the
period of time occurred. When the last day of the period computed is a Saturday, Sunday, national holiday, or other day on which
[[Page 52117]]
the Department of Housing and Urban Development is closed, the period
shall run until the end of the next following business day. When any
prescribed or allowed period of time is 7 days or less, each of the
Saturdays, Sundays, and national holidays shall be excluded from the computation of the prescribed or allowed period.
(b) Entry of orders. In computing any time period involving the
date of the issuance of an order or decision by a hearing officer, the
date of the issuance is the date the order or decision is served on the parties by the hearing officer or Docket Clerk.
(c) Service by mail. If a document is served by mail, 3 days shall be added to the time permitted for a response.
(d) Extensions of time periods. Except where mandated by statute,
the hearing officer (or in the case of a review under Sec. Sec. 26.26
and 26.27, the Secretary or designee) may upon motion enlarge the time
within which any act required by these rules must be performed where
necessary to avoid prejudicing the public interest or the rights of the parties.
In every case, there shall be a notice of administrative action.
The notice shall be in writing and inform the party of the nature of
that administrative action. The notice shall state the reasons for the
proposed or imposed action, except where general terms are permitted by
2 CFR part 2424, and shall inform the party of any right to a hearing
to challenge the administrative action, and the manner and time in
which to request such hearing. A supplemental notice may be issued in
the discretion of the initiating official to add to or modify the reasons for the action.
Sec. 26.13 Complaint.
(a) Respondent. A complaint shall be served upon the party against
whom an administrative action is taken, who shall be called the respondent.
(b) Grounds. The complaint shall state the legal and factual
grounds upon which the administrative action is based. The grounds set
forth in the complaint may not contain allegations beyond the scope of
the notice of administrative action or any amendment thereto.
(c) Notice of administrative action as complaint. A notice of
administrative action may serve as a complaint provided the notice
states it is also a complaint and complies with paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) Timing. When the notice does not serve as a complaint, the
complaint shall be served on or before the 30th day after the referral
to a hearing officer or a request for hearing is made, or within any other time period designated by the hearing officer.
Sec. 26.14 Answer.
(a) Respondent shall file an answer within 30 days of receipt of
the complaint, unless otherwise specified in this title or ordered by the hearing officer.
(b) The answer shall:
(1) Respond specifically to each factual allegation contained in the complaint;
(2) Specifically plead any affirmative defense; and
(3) Set forth any mitigating factors or extenuating circumstances.
(c) A general denial shall not be permitted. Allegations are
admitted when not specifically denied in respondent's answer. Sec. 26.15 Amendments and supplemental pleadings.
(a) Amendments. (1) By right: The Department may amend its
complaint without leave at any time within 30 days of the date the
complaint is filed or at any time before respondent's responsive
pleading is filed, whichever is later. Respondent may amend its answer
without leave at any time within 30 days of filing of its answer. A
party shall plead in response to an amended pleading within 15 days of receipt of the amended pleading.
(2) By leave: Upon conditions as are necessary to avoid prejudicing
the public interest and the rights of the parties, the hearing officer
may allow amendments to pleadings upon motion of any party.
(3) Conformance to evidence: When issues not raised by the
pleadings, but reasonably within the scope of the proceeding initiated
by the complaint, are tried by express or implied consent to the
parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been
raised in the pleadings, and amendments of the pleadings necessary to
make them conform to the evidence shall be allowed at any time.
(b) Supplemental pleadings. The hearing officer may, upon
reasonable notice, permit service of a supplemental pleading concerning
transactions, occurrences, or events that have happened or been discovered since the date of prior pleadings.
Sec. 26.16 Motions.
(a) Motions. Requests for rulings or actions to be taken by the
hearing officer should be made, wherever appropriate, in the form of a
motion. All motions from the commencement of the action until the
issuance of a decision shall be addressed to the hearing officer, and shall be served upon all parties to the proceeding.
(b) Content. All written motions shall state the particular order,
ruling, or action desired and the grounds for granting the motion. The parties may submit a proposed order with any motion.
(c) Responses to motions. Within 10 days after receipt of any
written motion, or within any other period as may be designated by the
hearing officer, the opposing party shall respond to the motion and set
forth any objections to the motion. Failure to file a timely response
to the motion may constitute a party's consent to the granting of the
motion. The moving party shall have no right to reply, except as permitted by the hearing officer.
(d) Motions for extensions of time. Either party may file a motion
for extension. At the discretion of the hearing officer, a motion for
an extension of time may be granted for good cause at any time,
notwithstanding an objection or any reply to the motion consistent with
the provisions of Sec. 26.2(c)(5) and (7). The hearing officer may
waive the requirements of this section as to motions for extensions of time.
(e) Oral argument. The hearing officer may order oral argument on any motion.
(f) Motions for summary judgment.
(1) A party claiming relief or a party against whom relief is
sought may timely move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim.
(2) Objections in the consideration of summary judgment motions or
answers thereto based upon a failure to strictly comply with the
provisions of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may, at the discretion of the hearing officer, be overruled.
(g) Motions for dismissal. When a motion to dismiss the proceeding
is granted, the hearing officer shall issue a determination and order in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 26.25.
Discovery
Sec. 26.17 Prehearing conference.
(a) Prehearing conference. The hearing officer may, sua sponte or
at the request of any party, direct counsel for all parties to confer
with the hearing officer before the hearing for the purpose of considering:
(1) Simplification and clarification of the issues;
(2) Stipulations and admissions of fact and of the contents and authenticity of documents;
[[Page 52118]]
(3) The disclosure of the names of witnesses;
(4) Matters of which official notice will be taken;
(5) Other matters as may aid in the orderly disposition of the
proceeding, including disclosure of the documents or other physical
exhibits that will be introduced into evidence in the course of the proceeding.
(b) Recordation of prehearing conference. The prehearing conference
shall, at the request of any party, be recorded or transcribed.
(c) Order on prehearing conference. The hearing officer shall enter
in the record an order that states the rulings upon matters considered
during the conference, together with appropriate directions to the
parties. The order shall control the subsequent course of the
proceeding, subject to modifications upon good cause shown. Sec. 26.18 Discovery.
(a) General. The parties are encouraged to engage in voluntary
discovery procedures, which may commence at any time after an answer
has been filed. Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not
privileged, that is relevant to the claim or defense of any party,
including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and
location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the
identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable
matter. For good cause, the hearing officer may order discovery of any
matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action. To be
relevant, information need not be admissible at the hearing, if the
discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence. Each party shall bear its own expenses associated with discovery. Discovery may include:
(1) Requests for production of documents as set forth in Sec. 26.19;
(2) Depositions as set forth in Sec. 26.20;
(3) Written interrogatories as set forth in Sec. 26.21; and
(4) Requests for admissions as set forth in Sec. 26.22.
(b) Supplementation of responses. A party who has responded to a
request for discovery with a response is under a duty to timely amend a
prior response to an interrogatory, request for production, or request
for admission if so ordered by the hearing officer, or if the party
learns that the response is in some material respect incomplete or
incorrect and if the additional or corrective information has not
otherwise been made known to the other parties during the discovery process or in writing.
(c) Requesting an order. In connection with any discovery
procedure, by motion addressed to the hearing officer and upon a
showing of a good faith attempt to resolve the issue without the hearing officer's intervention, either party may:
(1) Request an order compelling a response with respect to any
objection to or other failure to respond to the discovery requested or
any part thereof, or any failure to respond as specifically requested, or
(2) Request a protective order limiting the scope, methods, time
and place for discovery, and provisions for protecting privileged information or documents.
(d) Limitations. (1) By order, the hearing officer may set or alter
limits on the number of document requests, depositions, and interrogatories, or the length of depositions.
(2) Orders compelling discovery shall be issued only where such
discovery will not compel the disclosure of privileged information,
unduly delay the hearing, or result in prejudice to the public interest
or the rights of the parties, and upon a showing of good cause.
(3) Protective orders may be issued by a hearing officer if the
hearing officer determines such an order is necessary to protect a
party or other person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense because:
(i) The discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative,
or is obtainable from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive;
(ii) The party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by
discovery in the action to obtain the information sought; or
(iii) The burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its
likely benefit, taking into account the needs of the case, the amount
in controversy, the parties' resources, the importance of the issues at
stake in the litigation, and the importance of the proposed discovery in resolving the issues.
(4) A party need not provide discovery of electronically stored
information from sources that the party identifies as not reasonably
accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel
discovery or for a protective order, the party from whom discovery is
sought must show that the information is not reasonably accessible
because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the hearing
officer may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the
requesting party shows good cause or, when the party's refusal to
provide the information sought is solely due to undue expense, if the
party seeking the discovery agrees to bear the expense associated with the request.
(e) Refusal to honor discovery order. When a party refuses to honor
a discovery order, the hearing officer may issue such orders in regard to the refusal as justice shall require.
Sec. 26.19 Request for production of documents.
(a) Request to produce. Any party may serve upon any other party a
written request to produce, and permit the party making the request, or
someone acting on the requestor's behalf, to inspect, copy, test, or
sample any designated documentsincluding writings, drawings, graphs,
charts, photographs, sound recordings, images, and other data or data
compilations stored in any medium from which information can be
obtainedtranslated, if necessary, by the respondent into reasonably
usable form, or to inspect, copy, test, or sample any designated
tangible things that constitute or contain matters within the scope of
Sec. 26.18(a) and which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served.
(b) Procedure. The request shall set forth, either by individual
item or by category, the items to be inspected, and describe each with
reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time,
place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related
acts. The request may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced.
(c) Response to request to produce. The party upon whom the request
is served shall serve a written response within 20 days after service
of the request. A shorter or longer time may be directed by the hearing
officer, or in the absence of such an order, agreed to by the parties
in a written document that shall be timely submitted to the hearing
officer. The response shall state, with respect to each item or
category, whether inspection and related activities will be permitted
as requested. If there are any objections to any requests, including
objections to the requested form or forms for producing electronically
stored information, the response shall state the reasons for such
objections. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the
part shall be specified and inspection of the remaining parts shall be
permitted. If objection is made to the requested format or forms for
producing electronically stored informationor if no form was specified in the request
[[Page 52119]]
the responding party must state the form or forms it intends to use.
The party submitting the request may move for an order under Sec.
26.18(c)(1) with respect to any objection to or other failure to
respond to the request or any part thereof, or any failure to permit inspection as requested.
(d) Form of production. Unless the parties otherwise agree, or the hearing officer otherwise orders:
(1) A party who produces documents for inspection shall produce
them as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize
and label them to correspond with the categories in the request;
(2) If a request does not specify the format or forms for producing
electronically stored information, a responding party must produce the
information in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a form or forms that are reasonably usable; and
(3) A party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.
Sec. 26.20 Depositions.
(a) Taking oral deposition. A party may take the oral deposition of
any person. Reasonable written notice of deposition shall be served
upon the opposing party and the deponent. The attendance of a deponent
may be compelled by subpoena where authorized by law or by other order of the hearing officer.
(b) Testifying on oral deposition. Each person testifying on oral
deposition shall be placed under oath by the person before whom the
deposition is taken. The deponent may be examined and crossexamined.
The questions and the answers, together with all objections made, shall
be recorded by the person before whom the deposition is to be taken, or under that person's direction.
(c) Objections. Objection may be made to questions or answers for
any reason that would require the exclusion of the testimony under
Sec. 26.24 as if the witness were present and testifying at hearing.
Objections shall be in short form, stating every ground for objection.
Failure to object to any question or answer shall be considered a
waiver of objection, unless the parties agree otherwise. Rulings on any
objections shall be made by the hearing officer at hearing, or at such
other time requested by motion. The examination shall proceed, with the
testimony being taken subject to the objections; the deponent may be
instructed not to answer only when necessary to preserve a privilege,
to enforce a limitation directed by the hearing officer, or to present a motion for a protective order under Sec. 26.18(c)(2).
(d) Submission to deponent. A transcript of the deposition shall be
submitted to the deponent for examination and signature, unless
submission is waived by the deponent and the parties. Any changes in
form or substance that the deponent desires to make shall be entered
upon the transcript by the person before whom the deposition was taken,
with a statement of reasons given by the deponent for making them. The
transcript shall then be signed by the deponent, unless the parties by
stipulation waive the signing or the deponent is ill, cannot be found,
or refuses to sign. If the transcript is not signed, the person before
whom the deposition was taken shall sign it and state on the record the reason that it is not signed.
(e) Certification and filing. The person before whom the deposition
was taken shall make a certification on the transcript as to its
accuracy. Interested parties shall make their own arrangements with the
person recording the testimony for copies of the testimony and the exhibits.
(f) Deposition as evidence. Subject to appropriate rulings by the
hearing officer on objections, the deposition or any part may be
introduced into evidence for any purpose if the deponent is
unavailable. Only that part of a deposition that is received in
evidence at a hearing shall constitute a part of the record in the
proceeding upon which a decision may be based. Nothing in this rule is
intended to limit the use of a deposition for impeachment purposes.
(g) Payment of fees. Fees shall be paid by the person upon whose application the deposition is taken.
Sec. 26.21 Written interrogatories.
(a) Service of interrogatories. Any party may serve upon any other
party written interrogatories, not to exceed 25 in number, including
all discrete subparts, unless additional interrogatories are agreed to
by the parties or leave to serve additional interrogatories is granted by the hearing officer.
(b) Response to interrogatories. Within 20 days after service of
the request, the party upon whom the interrogatories are served shall
serve a written response, unless the parties agree in a written
document submitted to the hearing officer or the hearing officer
determines that a shorter or longer period is appropriate under the
circumstances. The response shall specifically answer each
interrogatory, separately and fully in writing, unless it is objected
to, in which event the objecting party shall state the reasons for any
objections with specificity. Any ground not stated in a timely
objection is waived unless the party's failure to object is excused by
the hearing officer for good cause shown. If objection is made to only
part of an interrogatory, the objectionable part shall be specified and
the party shall answer to the extent that the interrogatory is not objectionable.
(c) Option to produce business records. Where the answer to an
interrogatory may be derived or ascertained from the business records,
including electronically stored information, of the party upon whom the
interrogatory has been served or from an examination, audit, or
inspection of such business records, including a compilation, abstract,
or summary thereof, and the burden of deriving or ascertaining the
answer is substantially the same for the party serving the
interrogatory as for the party served, it is a sufficient answer to
such interrogatory to specify the records from which the answer may be
derived or ascertained and to afford to the party serving the
interrogatory reasonable opportunity to examine, audit, or inspect such
records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts, or summaries. A
specification shall be in sufficient detail to permit the interrogating
party to locate and to identify, as readily as can by the party served, the records from which the answer may be ascertained.
Sec. 26.22 Requests for admissions.
(a) Any party may serve upon any other party a written request for
the admission of the genuineness of any relevant documents described in
the request or of the truth of any relevant matters of fact. Copies of
documents shall be delivered with the request unless copies have
already been furnished. Each requested admission shall be considered
admitted, unless within 30 days after service of the request, or within
such other time as the parties may agree, or the hearing officer
determines, the party from whom the admission is sought serves upon the party making the request either:
(1) A statement that:
(i) Denies specifically the relevant matters for which an admission
is requested, or sets forth in detail the reasons why the party can neither truthfully admit nor deny them;
(ii) Fairly meets the substance of the requested admission and,
when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of the matter
[[Page 52120]]
of which an admission is requested, specifies as much of it as is true and qualifies or denies the remainder; and
(iii) Does not assert lack of information or knowledge as a reason
for failure to admit or deny, unless the party states that the party
has made reasonable inquiry, and that the information known or readily
obtainable by the party is insufficient to enable the party to admit or deny; or
(2) Written objections to a requested admission that:
(i) State the grounds for the objection; and
(ii) Object to a requested admission, if necessary, either in whole or in part, on the basis of privilege or relevance.
(b) Responses to the request for admission on matters to which
objections have been made may be deferred until the objection is ruled
upon, but if written objections are made only to a part of a request, a
response to the remainder of the request shall be provided.
(c) Any matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established
unless the hearing officer, on motion, permits withdrawal or amendment
of the admission. Admissions obtained pursuant to this procedure may be
used in evidence only for the purposes of the pending action. The use
of obtained admissions as evidence is permitted to the same extent and subject to the same objections as other evidence.
Hearings
Sec. 26.23 Public nature and timing of hearings; transcripts.
(a) Public hearings. All hearings in adjudicative proceedings shall be public.
(b) Conduct of hearing. Hearings shall proceed with all reasonable
speed. The hearing officer may order recesses for good cause, stated on
the record. The hearing officer may, for convenience of the parties or
witnesses, or in the interests of justice, order that hearings be
conducted outside of Washington, DC, and, if necessary, in more than one location.
(c) Transcripts. Hearings shall be recorded and transcribed only by
a reporter designated by the Department under the supervision of the
hearing officer. The original transcript shall be a part of the record
and shall constitute the sole official transcript. Any party or a
member of the public, at his own expense, may obtain copies of transcripts from the reporter.
Sec. 26.24 Rules of evidence.
(a) Evidence. Every party shall have the right to present its case
or defense by oral and documentary evidence, unless otherwise limited
by law or regulation, to conduct such crossexamination and to submit
rebuttal evidence as may be required for a full and true disclosure of
the facts. Irrelevant, immaterial, privileged, or unduly repetitious
evidence shall be excluded. Unless otherwise provided for in this part,
the Federal Rules of Evidence shall provide guidance to the hearing
officer in the conduct of proceedings under this part, but shall not be
binding. Parties may object to clearly irrelevant material, but
technical and hearsay objections to testimony as used in a court of law will not be sustained.
(b) Testimony under oath or affirmation. All witnesses shall testify under oath or affirmation.
(c) Objections. Objections to the admission or exclusion of
evidence shall be in short form, stating the grounds of objections.
Rulings on objections shall be a part of the transcript. Failure to
object to admission or exclusion of evidence or to any evidentiary
ruling shall be considered a waiver of objection, but no exception to a
ruling on an objection is necessary in order to preserve it for appeal.
(d) Authenticity of documents. Unless specifically challenged, it
shall be presumed that all relevant documents are authentic. An
objection to the authenticity of a document shall not be sustained merely on the basis that it is not the original.
(e) Stipulations. The parties may stipulate as to any relevant
matters of fact. Stipulations may be received in evidence at a hearing,
and when received shall be binding on the parties with respect to the
matters stipulated. The parties are encouraged to enter into stipulations of fact whenever possible.
(f) Official notice. All matters officially noticed by the hearing officer shall appear on the record.
(g) Burden of proof. The burden of proof shall be upon the
proponent of an action or affirmative defense, including, where
applicable, mitigating factors, unless otherwise provided by law or regulation.
Sec. 26.25 Hearing officer's determination and order.
(a) Scope of review. The hearing officer shall conduct a de novo
review of the administrative action to determine whether it is
supported by a preponderance of the evidence, unless a different
standard of proof is required by law or regulation. Each and every
charge alleged by the Department need not be proven to support the
administrative action. The hearing officer may modify or vacate the
administrative action under review only upon a particularized finding
of facts that justifies a deviation from the administrative action.
(b) Closing of hearing. At the discretion of the hearing officer,
the closing of the record may be postponed in order to permit the
admission of other evidence into the record. In the event further
evidence is admitted, each party shall be given an opportunity to respond to such evidence.
(c) Briefs. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the hearing officer may
request the parties to file proposed findings of fact and legal briefs.
The hearing officer shall make a written determination and order based
upon evidence and arguments presented by the parties. The determination
shall be founded upon reliable and probative evidence. This determination and order shall be served upon all parties.
(d) Bench decisions. Where the parties agree and where appropriate
in the judgment of the hearing officer, a bench decision will be issued.
(e) Time period for issuance of decision. The hearing officer shall
endeavor to issue a determination within 60 days from the date of the closing of the record.
(f) Finality of determination. The determination and order shall be
final unless a party timely appeals the determination in accordance
with Sec. 26.26. The determination shall inform the parties that, if
provided for and consistent with Departmental regulations, any party
may request, in writing, Secretarial review of the determination within
30 days after the hearing officer issues the determination, in
accordance with Sec. 26.26 of this part. The determination shall
include the mailing address, facsimile number, and electronic
submission information to which the request for Secretarial review
should be sent. A request for Secretarial review may be made by mail, delivery, facsimile, or electronic submission.
Secretarial Review
Sec. 26.26 Review of determination of hearing officers.
(a) Except in matters arising under 2 CFR part 2424, any party may
file with the Secretary an appeal within 30 days after the date that
the hearing officer issues a determination or order. The Secretary or
designee may extend the 30day period, in the Secretary's sole discretion, for good cause.
(b) Brief in support of appeal. The appeal shall be accompanied by
a written brief, not to exceed 15 pages, setting forth the party's specific objections to the determination or order
[[Page 52121]]
of the hearing officer and the party's supporting reasons for any
objections. The appealing party may request leave to file a brief in
excess of 15 pages for good cause shown. Alternative proposed findings and conclusions, if any, may be appended as an exhibit.
(c) Briefs in opposition. Any opposing party may submit a brief in
opposition to the appeal, not to exceed 15 pages, within 20 days of
receiving a copy of the appeal and accompanying brief. The opposing
party may request leave to file a brief in excess of 15 pages for good
cause shown. The brief in opposition shall specifically state the
opposing party's reasons for supporting the hearing officer's
determination, or for objecting to any part of the hearing officer's determination.
(d) Service. The appeal and all briefs shall be served on all parties and on the Docket Clerk.
(e) Forwarding of the record. Upon request by the Office of the
Secretary, the hearing officer shall forward the record of the proceeding to the Secretary or the Secretary's designee.
(f) Time extensions. The Secretary, or designee, in his or her sole
discretion, may extend the deadlines or page limitations set forth in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. The Secretary or designee may
also permit the filing of additional briefs, in his or her sole discretion.
(g) Personal appearance. There is no right to appear personally before the Secretary or designee.
(h) Interlocutory rulings. There is no right to appeal any
interlocutory ruling by the hearing officer, except as provided for in Sec. 26.27.
(i) Objection not raised before hearing officer. In reviewing the
determination or order, the Secretary, or designee, shall not consider
any objection that was not raised before the hearing officer unless a
demonstration is made of extraordinary circumstances causing the failure to raise the objection.
(j) Evidence in the record. The Secretary or designee shall
consider only evidence contained in the record forwarded by the hearing
officer. However, if any party demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Secretary or designee that additional evidence not presented at the
hearing is material, and that there were reasonable grounds for the
failure to present such evidence at the hearing, the Secretary or
designee shall remand the matter to the hearing officer for reconsideration in light of the additional evidence.
(k) Ex parte communications. The prohibitions of ex parte
communications in Sec. 26.3 shall apply to contacts with the Secretary or the Secretary's designee.
(l) Determination. The Secretary or designee may affirm, modify,
reverse, remand, reduce, compromise, or settle any determination made
or action ordered in the initial determination or order. The Secretary
or designee shall consider, and include in any final determination,
such factors as may be set forth in applicable statutes or regulations.
(m) Written determination. Where a request for Secretarial review
has been timely made, the Secretary, or designee, shall issue a written
determination within 30 days after receipt of the request for review,
and shall serve it upon the parties to the hearing and the hearing
officer. The Secretary, or designee, may extend the time in which a
written determination must be issued by an additional 60 days for good
cause shown in a written justification issued to the parties. The
written determination of the Secretary shall be final. If the
Secretary, or designee, does not act upon the request for review of a
determination within 90 days of service of the request, then the initial determination shall be the final agency action.
Sec. 26.27 Interlocutory rulings.
(a) Interlocutory rulings by the hearing officer. A party seeking
review of an interlocutory ruling shall file a motion with the hearing
officer within 10 days of the ruling requesting certification of the
ruling for review by the Secretary, or in cases arising under 2 CFR
part 2424, with the Debarring Official. Certification may be granted if the hearing officer believes that:
(1) It involves an important issue of law or policy as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion; and
(2) An immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Dane Narode, Acting Associate General
Counsel, Office of Program Enforcement, Administrative Proceedings
Division, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1250 Maryland
Avenue, Suite 200, Washington, DC 200240500; telephone 2027082350 (this is not a tollfree number); email address:
Dane.M.Narode@hud.gov. Hearing or speechimpaired individuals may
access the voice telephone number listed above by calling the tollfree
Federal Information Relay Service during working hours at 8008778339.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 10 CFR Part 50 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571 39 CFR Part 3020