Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-58906; File No. SR-Phlx-2008-76]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. Relating to an Increase in the Maximum Number of Quoters Permitted in an Option
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: November 6, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''), \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 4, 2008, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
[[Page 67240]]
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b4 thereunder,\4\ proposes to amend Exchange Rule 507, Application
for Approval as an SQT or RSQT and Assignment in Options, which governs
the assignment of options to Streaming Quote Traders (``SQTs'') \5\ and
Remote Streaming Quote Traders (``RSQTs''),\6\ by establishing a higher
maximum number of quoting participants (``Maximum Number of Quoters''
or ``MNQ'') in equity options that are not in the top 15% most actively traded based upon monthly national volume.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\5\ An SQT is an Exchange Registered Options Trader (``ROT'')
who has received permission from the Exchange to generate and submit
options quotations electronically through AUTOM in eligible options
to which such SQT is assigned. An SQT may only submit such
quotations while such SQT is physically present on the floor of the Exchange. See Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A).
\6\ An RSQT is a ROT that is a member or member organization
with no physical trading floor presence who has received permission
from the Exchange to generate and submit option quotations
electronically through AUTOM in eligible options to which such RSQT
has been assigned. An RSQT may only submit such quotations
electronically from off the floor of the Exchange. See Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B).
The Exchange further proposes to amend Commentary .05 to Rule 507 to reflect the current practice of announcing changes to the MNQ on its web site.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://www.phlx.com/regulatory/reg_rulefilings.aspx. II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to provide additional liquidity in equity options on the Exchange by increasing the MNQ in certain options.
Currently, the Exchange limits the number of participants that may
be assigned to a particular equity option at any one time based upon
each option's monthly national volume. Commentary .02 to Rule 507 sets
forth tiered MNQ levels permitting 22 market participants for the top
5% most actively traded options; 17 market participants for next 10%
most actively traded options, and 12 market participants for all other
options.\7\ The ranking is based upon the preceding month's national
volumes. The Exchange proposes to increase the MNQ level for equity
options that are not in the top 15% most actively traded from 12 market participants to 15.\8\
\7\ When initially adopted, Commentary .01 (a)(c) established
MNQ levels of 20 market participants for the top 5% most actively
traded options; 15 market participants for next 10% most actively
traded options; and 10 market participants for all other options.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55114 (January 17, 2007), 72
FR 3185 (January 24, 2007) (SRPhlx200681). These MNQ levels were
subsequently increased to the current levels of 22, 17, and 12,
respectively. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56261 (August 17, 2007), 72 FR 47112 (August 22, 2007) (SRPhlx200751).
\8\ Commentary .05 to Rule 507 states that the Exchange may
increase the MNQ levels established in this Commentary (meaning the
22, 17, and 12 numbers established in Commentary .01(a)(c)) by
submitting to the SEC a rule filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Exchange Act. The Exchange may decrease the MNQ levels
established in this Commentary upon SEC approval of a rule filing
submitted pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act.
Finally, Commentary .05 to Rule 507 states that the Exchange will inform market participants of changes to the MNQ via Exchange circular. The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .05 to Rule 507 to reflect its current practice of announcing changes to the MNQ on its Web site. 2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest, by adding depth and liquidity to the Exchange's markets in certain equity options.
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
The Exchange further believes that increasing the MNQ in certain
equity options is procompetitive, because it adds depth and liquidity
to the Exchange's markets by permitting additional participants to compete on the Exchange.
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6)
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a selfregulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange fulfilled this requirement.
[[Page 67241]]
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
\13\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E826957 Filed 111208; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P
SUMMARY: NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: November 6, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''), \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 4, 2008, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
[[Page 67240]]
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b4 thereunder,\4\ proposes to amend Exchange Rule 507, Application
for Approval as an SQT or RSQT and Assignment in Options, which governs
the assignment of options to Streaming Quote Traders (``SQTs'') \5\ and
Remote Streaming Quote Traders (``RSQTs''),\6\ by establishing a higher
maximum number of quoting participants (``Maximum Number of Quoters''
or ``MNQ'') in equity options that are not in the top 15% most actively traded based upon monthly national volume.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\5\ An SQT is an Exchange Registered Options Trader (``ROT'')
who has received permission from the Exchange to generate and submit
options quotations electronically through AUTOM in eligible options
to which such SQT is assigned. An SQT may only submit such
quotations while such SQT is physically present on the floor of the Exchange. See Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A).
\6\ An RSQT is a ROT that is a member or member organization
with no physical trading floor presence who has received permission
from the Exchange to generate and submit option quotations
electronically through AUTOM in eligible options to which such RSQT
has been assigned. An RSQT may only submit such quotations
electronically from off the floor of the Exchange. See Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B).
The Exchange further proposes to amend Commentary .05 to Rule 507 to reflect the current practice of announcing changes to the MNQ on its web site.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://www.phlx.com/regulatory/reg_rulefilings.aspx. II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to provide additional liquidity in equity options on the Exchange by increasing the MNQ in certain options.
Currently, the Exchange limits the number of participants that may
be assigned to a particular equity option at any one time based upon
each option's monthly national volume. Commentary .02 to Rule 507 sets
forth tiered MNQ levels permitting 22 market participants for the top
5% most actively traded options; 17 market participants for next 10%
most actively traded options, and 12 market participants for all other
options.\7\ The ranking is based upon the preceding month's national
volumes. The Exchange proposes to increase the MNQ level for equity
options that are not in the top 15% most actively traded from 12 market participants to 15.\8\
\7\ When initially adopted, Commentary .01 (a)(c) established
MNQ levels of 20 market participants for the top 5% most actively
traded options; 15 market participants for next 10% most actively
traded options; and 10 market participants for all other options.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55114 (January 17, 2007), 72
FR 3185 (January 24, 2007) (SRPhlx200681). These MNQ levels were
subsequently increased to the current levels of 22, 17, and 12,
respectively. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56261 (August 17, 2007), 72 FR 47112 (August 22, 2007) (SRPhlx200751).
\8\ Commentary .05 to Rule 507 states that the Exchange may
increase the MNQ levels established in this Commentary (meaning the
22, 17, and 12 numbers established in Commentary .01(a)(c)) by
submitting to the SEC a rule filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Exchange Act. The Exchange may decrease the MNQ levels
established in this Commentary upon SEC approval of a rule filing
submitted pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act.
Finally, Commentary .05 to Rule 507 states that the Exchange will inform market participants of changes to the MNQ via Exchange circular. The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .05 to Rule 507 to reflect its current practice of announcing changes to the MNQ on its Web site. 2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest, by adding depth and liquidity to the Exchange's markets in certain equity options.
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
The Exchange further believes that increasing the MNQ in certain
equity options is procompetitive, because it adds depth and liquidity
to the Exchange's markets by permitting additional participants to compete on the Exchange.
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6)
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a selfregulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange fulfilled this requirement.
[[Page 67241]]
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
\13\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E826957 Filed 111208; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 50 CFR Part 679 40 CFR Part 180 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 40 CFR Part 63 6 CFR Part 5 33 CFR Part 100 50 CFR Part 622 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 44 CFR Part 65 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 271 40 CFR Part 300 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 39 CFR Part 3020 50 CFR Part 229 44 CFR Part 64 49 CFR Part 571