II. Discussion and Commission's Findings

After careful review, including consideration of the comment letter received \28\ and FINRA's response thereto,\29\ the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
[[Page 68470]]
association.\30\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act,\31\ which requires that FINRA rules are designed to assure a fair representation of FINRA's members in the administration of its affairs. Additionally, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\32\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\28\ See supra note 4.
\29\ See letter from Carla Carloni, Associate Vice President, FINRA, to Florence E. Harmon, Acting Secretary, Commission, dated October 22, 2008, at 1 (``FINRA Response Letter'').
\30\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(4).
\32\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(6).
A. Changes to the NAC

1. Composition

FINRA proposes that the restructured NAC consist of 14 members, including seven industry members, two of whom will be ``at large'' and five of whom will be designated specifically as representatives of large firms, midsize firms, and small firms, and seven nonindustry members, three of whom are public.\33\ As noted above, the Commission received one letter regarding this proposal.\34\ The commenter expressed support for the proposal, although he noted a concern that NAC members no longer would be required to come from different geographic regions of the country. In response, FINRA stated that it will ``remain sensitive'' to the commenter's concern.\35\ FINRA also pointed out that, under the proposed nomination process, which is discussed further below, the District Nominating Committees, which currently select the five industry members on the NAC that come from the five geographic regions, are permitted to recommend candidates to the Nominating Committee.
\33\ A public member of the NAC has no material business relationship with a broker or dealer or a selfregulatory
organization registered under the Act.
\34\ See supra note 4.

\35\ See FINRA Response Letter, supra note 29.

The Commission finds that the proposed composition of the NAC satisfies the fair representation requirement of Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act because five of the 14 NAC members will be industry members, elected by member firms of similar size.\36\ The proposed rule change aligns the representation of industry members on the NAC to follow more closely the industry representation of the FINRA Board. Previously, the Commission found that the composition of the FINRA Board satisfies the fair representation requirement of Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act.\37\ \36\ See infra note 43 and accompanying text.
\37\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56145, supra note 5, 72 FR at 42182.

2. Nomination and Election

FINRA proposes that the Nominating Committee identify and solicit candidates for all NAC seats, including the five industrymember positions that are based on firm size. The Nominating Committee would be free to consult with and receive recommendations for industry NAC members from other FINRA committees, including the District Nominating Committees, before submitting nominees to the FINRA Board.

Under the proposed rule change, Additional Candidates would be: (a) Permitted to petition for consideration as Small, MidSize, or Large Firm NAC Members, based on the size of the firm with which they are registered; and (b) able to qualify for a contested election by gathering petitions from three percent of the firms in their size category. In the event of a contested election, FINRA members would have an opportunity to vote for a NAC candidate based on firm size.\38\ Specifically, small, midsize, or large firms would vote for NAC candidates only if the contested election was for a NAC seat designated for a firm of corresponding size.
\38\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.3 (List of FINRA Members Eligible to Vote) and Article VI, Section 6.7 (Ballots).

The proposed rule change authorizes the FINRA Secretary to collect information from candidates to determine that the nominee or Additional Candidate, as applicable, satisfies the definition of an Industry, Small Firm, MidSized Firm, Large Firm, NonIndustry, or Public Member of the NAC.\39\ The proposed rule change also ensures that the winner of a contested election would serve on the NAC. While all NAC members would continue to be recommended initially by the Nominating Committee and appointed by the FINRA Board,\40\ the candidate who receives the most votes in any contested election for a Small, MidSize, or Large Firm NAC Member seat would be required under the FINRA Regulation By Laws to be appointed to the NAC.\41\ FINRA does not propose to change the NAC selection process if no Additional Candidates reach the threshold to qualify for a contested election. When there are no additional candidates, the industry NAC members selected by the Nominating Committee would not have a contested election and would be recommended for appointment to the NAC.\42\
\39\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.4 (Nomination Process).
\40\ The seven nonindustry members and two atlarge industry members would continue to follow the nomination and Board
appointment process currently employed for nonindustry and atlarge industry NAC members.
\41\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.3 (Appointments) and 5.5 (Rejection of Nominating Committee Nominee).
\42\ The proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws would continue to allow the Nominating Committee to propose two or more candidates for a single open small, midsize, or large firm NAC seat. See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.5 (Notice of Contested Nomination). In such a case, there would be a contested election. The proposed rule change would clarify that only when the Nominating Committee nominates two or more candidates for the same open seat would the Nominating Committee trigger a contested election.

The Commission finds that the proposed petition process, coupled with the proposed ByLaw provisions on the NAC's composition, also are consistent with the fair representation requirement of Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act. As noted above, the Commission previously approved a proposed rule change relating to the composition of the FINRA Board that similarly provided firms with the right to petition for and vote on FINRA Board candidates industry members, according to firm size.\43\ The Commission also notes that FINRA's proposal to permit Additional Candidates to qualify for a contested election by gathering petitions from three percent of the firms in their size category (or ten percent in the case of petitions in support of more than one person) is lower than the ten percent threshold that has been in place under the ByLaws to qualify a FINRA member as an Additional Candidate for a regional NAC seat.\44\
\43\ See supra note 37.
\44\ Compare current FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.15 (Requirement for Petition Supporting Additional Candidate) with proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.2 (Designation of Additional Candidates).

In addition, FINRA proposes to: (a) The narrow circumstances under which the Nominating Committee may support its candidate by sending a maximum of two mailings in support of its nominee; and (b) assign to the Secretary of FINRA the duties of sending notice to FINRA members announcing a contested NAC election, assisting in preparing ballots; preparing a list of FINRA members eligible to vote, arranging for the location for counting of ballots by an independent agent; resolving ballots that were set aside, as necessary,
[[Page 68471]]
extending a time period regarding elections for good cause, and similar duties. The Commission finds that these proposals are consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\45\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\45\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(6).

3. Other Changes

FINRA proposes to allow NAC to continue to function for a period of 6 months or less while a vacancy is being filled.

FINRA proposes to broaden the FINRA Board's oversight authority over the NAC.\46\ The proposed rule change grants the FINRA Board authority to remove all NAC members (for refusal, failure, neglect, or inability to discharge duties), accept their resignations, appoint them, and declare them disqualified. FINRA believes that this change will benefit the appellate portion of the disciplinary process.\47\ \46\ The authority of the FINRA Board to establish disciplinary procedures, impose sanctions, and review disciplinary decisions of the NAC are discussed in the Notice. See Notice, supra note 3, 73 FR at 56875.

\47\ See id.

The proposed rule change eliminates the reference to the Chair of the NAC serving as a Director of the FINRA Regulation Board for a one year term. FINRA explains that this provision is obsolete because the NAC Chair is no longer an automatic member of the FINRA Regulation Board.

FINRA proposes to narrow the pool of people qualified to be an ``Industry Member,'' requiring that a person who has served as an officer, director, or employee of a broker or dealer, within the past year (instead of three years) is considered to be ``industry.'' The proposed change is consistent with the definitions of ``Industry Governor'' and ``Industry committee member'' in the FINRA ByLaws.\48\ \48\ See FINRA ByLaws, Article I(t).

The proposal also adds the term ``independent director'' to the portion of the definition of ``Industry Member'' that excludes outside directors of a broker or dealer. FINRA states that the goal of this proposal is to harmonize use of the term ``independent director'' when defining an Industry Governor in the FINRA Regulation ByLaws and the FINRA ByLaws.

In addition, FINRA would modify the qualifications for ``Public Director'' and ``Public Member.'' Currently, only someone with no material business relationship with a broker, dealer, or the NASD, NASD Regulation, or a market for which NASD provides regulation is eligible for those positions. Alternatively, FINRA proposes to require that Public Directors and Public Members have no material business relationship with a broker, dealer, or a self regulatory organization registered under the Act (``SRO''), provided that service as a public director of an SRO or as a public member on an SRO committee is not disqualifying.

Finally, FINRA proposes to make the following nonsubstantive replacements in the FINRA Regulation ByLaws:

The Commission finds that these proposed changes are consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\49\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\49\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(6).

III. Conclusion

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\50\ that the proposed rule change (SRFINRA2008046) be, and it hereby is, approved.

\50\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\51\
\51\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E827249 Filed 111708; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P

SUMMARY: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.,

DOCUMENT BODY 2: November 6, 2008.

On September 8, 2008, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA,'' f/k/a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and NASD) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the ByLaws of FINRA's regulatory subsidiary, FINRA Regulation, Inc. (``FINRA Regulation,'' f/k/a NASD Regulation, Inc.). On September 17, 2008, FINRA filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The proposed rule change was published in the Federal Register on September 30, 2008.\3\ The Commission received one comment on the proposal.\4\ This order approves the proposed rule change.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58626 (September 23, 2008), 73 FR 56872 (``Notice'').
\4\ The commenter stated that FINRA's proposal seemed reasonable and that he generally favored it. However, he expressed concern about the elimination of the regional representation on the National Adjudicatory Council (``NAC''). See letter from Neal E. Nakagiri, Esq., NPB Financial Group, LLC, to Florence E. Harmon, Acting Secretary, Commission, dated October 20, 2008.
I. Background and Description of the Proposal

A. Background

On July 30, 2007, NASD and the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. consolidated their member firm regulation operations into a combined organization, FINRA. As part of the consolidation, the Commission approved amendments to the NASD ByLaws to implement governance and related changes.\5\ The approved changes included a FINRA Board governance structure that balanced public and industry representation and designated seven governor seats to represent member firms of various sizes based on the criteria of firm size.\6\
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56145 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42169 (August 1, 2007), as amended by Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56145A (May 30, 2008), 73 FR 32377 (June 6, 2008) (File No. SRNASD2007023).
\6\ The FINRA Board consists of eleven Public Governors (who are appointed), ten Industry Governors (seven of whom are elected by industry members), the current Chief Executive Officer (``CEO'') of NYSE Regulation, and the current CEO of FINRA. The ten Industry Governors include: (a) Three elected Governors who are registered with member firms that employ 500 or more registered persons (Large Firm Governors); (b) one elected Governor who is registered with a member firm that employs at least 151 and no more than 499 registered persons (MidSize Firm Governor); (c) three elected Governors who are registered with member firms that employ at least one and no more than 150 registered persons (Small Firm Governors); (d) one appointed Governor who is associated with a floor member of the New York Stock Exchange; (e) one appointed Governor who is associated with an independent contractor financial planning member firm or an insurance company affiliate; and (f) one appointed Governor who is associated with an affiliate of an investment company. See FINRA ByLaws, Article VII (Board of Governors).

FINRA Regulation is a subsidiary of FINRA that operates according to the Plan of Allocation and Delegation of Functions by NASD to Subsidiaries, as amended, which NASD adopted first in 1996 when it formed NASD Regulation. FINRA Regulation's ByLaws were not amended at the time of the
[[Page 68468]]
consolidation, other than in a few sections where those ByLaws conflicted with the new FINRA ByLaws.

B. Description of the Proposal

The proposed rule change would amend the FINRA Regulation ByLaws (``ByLaws'') to: (1) Restructure the industry representation on the NAC to parallel the firmsize criteria for industry representation on the FINRA Board; (2) modify the nomination process for certain industry member seats on the NAC by using the FINRA Nominating Committee (``Nominating Committee'') and by discontinuing the Regional Nominating Committees; and (3) adopt conforming changes to reflect the corporate name change and similar matters.\7\
\7\ The proposed rule change would revise, delete, and/or renumber various provisions of the FINRA Regulation ByLaws. Renumbered sections are referred to herein as ``proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws.'' All other sections (that is, sections for which new numbering did not result from the proposed revisions) are referred to as ``current FINRA Regulation ByLaws.''

1. Changes to the NAC

The NAC reviews all disciplinary decisions issued by Hearing Panels and presides over disciplinary matters that have been appealed to or called for review by the NAC. The NAC also reviews statutory disqualification matters and considers appeals of membership proceedings and exemption requests.\8\
\8\ See current FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.1 (Appointment and Authority).

a. Composition

Under the current ByLaws, the NAC must consist of no fewer than 12 and no more than 14 members, and the number of nonindustry members, including at least three public members, must equal or exceed the number of industry members.\9\ Since 1999, each of five geographic regions, which had been established by the NASD Board of Governors, has been represented on the NAC. Consistent with Article V of the FINRA Regulation ByLaws, the current NAC consists of 14 members \10\ and includes seven industry and seven nonindustry members.\11\ Five of the industry NAC members represent the five geographic regions, and the remaining two industry seats are ``atlarge'' seats, which NASD historically used (and FINRA currently uses) to add balance to the types of firms being represented on the NAC.\12\
\9\ See current FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.2 (Number of Members and Qualifications).
\10\ See Notice, supra note 3, 73 FR 56872, 56873, n.6. \11\ See Notice, supra note 3, 73 FR at 56873.

\12\ Id.

FINRA proposes to eliminate the size range of the NAC (1214 members) prescribed by the current ByLaws and instead provide that the NAC consist of 14 members. Additionally, FINRA proposes that the NAC be divided equally between industry and nonindustry members, and thereby eliminate the possibility that the number of nonindustry members exceed the number of industry members.

The proposed rule change also would eliminate regional representation on the NAC and instead provide for representation of the various firm sizes. Specifically, FINRA would replace the five region based industry members of the NAC with two small firm, one midsize firm, and two large firm industry representatives.

In summary, the restructured NAC would consist of 14 members, including seven industry members, two of whom would be ``at large,'' and five of whom would be designated specifically as representatives of large firms, midsize firms, and small firms, and seven nonindustry members, three of whom are public.\13\ The tenure of NAC members generally is three years and the terms of the members are staggered. The proposal would not disrupt the process of approximately onethird of the NAC members completing their service in a particular year and being replaced with newly appointed NAC members. The proposal would result in a Small Firm and a Large Firm NAC Member joining the NAC near the beginning of 2009; a MidSize Firm NAC Member joining in 2010; and a Small Firm and Large Firm NAC Member joining in 2011.\14\ \13\ A public member of the NAC has no material business relationship with a broker or dealer or a selfregulatory
organization registered under the Act.
\14\ A Large Firm is any broker or dealer admitted to membership in FINRA which, at the time of determination, has 500 or more registered persons. A MidSize Firm is any broker or dealer admitted to membership in FINRA which, at the time of determination, has at least 151 and no more than 499 registered persons. A Small Firm is any broker or dealer admitted to membership in FINRA which, at the time of determination, has at least 1 and no more than 150 registered persons. See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article I (Definitions) (defining Small Firm, Small Firm NAC Member, Large Firm, Large Firm NAC Member, MidSize Firm, and MidSize Firm NAC Member, respectively).

b. Nomination and Election Process

Currently, nonindustry members of the NAC and two ``atlarge'' industry members are nominated to serve on the NAC by the Nominating Committee and then appointed by the FINRA Regulation Board.\15\ The five industry members of the NAC who are drawn from the five geographic regions are selected through Regional Nominating Committees (through either an uncontested or a contested nomination process), then nominated by the Nominating Committee, and finally appointed by the FINRA Regulation Board.

\15\ See supra note 13.

In conjunction with its proposed transition to representation on the NAC based on firm size, FINRA would simplify the NAC appointment process for industry representatives and follow more closely the procedures for electing industry members of the FINRA Board. FINRA proposes to eliminate the five Regional Nominating Committees and have the Nominating Committee perform their function. Instead of relying on Regional Nominating Committees to identify possible industry candidates and submit candidates to the Nominating Committee and the FINRA Regulation Board, FINRA proposes that the Nominating Committee would identify and solicit candidates for all NAC seats, including the five industrymember positions that are to be based on firm size.\16\ FINRA states that the Nominating Committee would be free to consult with or receive recommendations for industry NAC members from other FINRA committees, such as the District Nominating Committees, before communicating its nominations to the FINRA Board.
\16\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.3 (Appointments).

Individuals who seek to serve on the NAC but who were not nominated (``Additional Candidates'') would still be allowed to gather petitions in support of their candidacy and potentially compete in a contested election. The proposed rule change permits Additional Candidates to petition for consideration as Small, MidSize, or Large Firm NAC Members, based on the size of the firm with which they are registered. Additional Candidates would be able to qualify for a contested election by gathering petitions from three percent (or ten percent in the case of petitions in support of more than one person) of the firms in their size category.\17\ In the event of a contested election, FINRA members would have an opportunity to vote for a NAC candidate based on firm size.\18\
[[Page 68469]]
Specifically, small, midsize, or large firms would vote for NAC candidates only if the contested election was for a NAC seat designated for a firm of corresponding size.
\17\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 6.2 (Designation of Additional Candidates).
\18\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.3 (List of FINRA Members Eligible to Vote) and Article VI, Section 6.7 (Ballots).

The proposed rule change authorizes the FINRA Secretary to collect information from candidates to determine that the nominee or Additional Candidate, as applicable, satisfies the definition of an Industry, Small Firm, MidSized Firm, Large Firm, NonIndustry, or Public Member of the NAC.\19\
\19\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.4 (Nomination Process).

The proposed rule change also ensures that the winner of a contested election serves on the NAC. While all NAC members would continue to be recommended initially by the Nominating Committee and appointed by the FINRA Board,\20\ the candidate who receives the most votes in any contested election for a Small, MidSize, or Large Firm NAC Member seat would be required under the FINRA Regulation ByLaws to be appointed to the NAC.\21\ FINRA does not propose to change the NAC selection process if no Additional Candidates reach the threshold to qualify for a contested election; when there are no Additional Candidates, the industry NAC members selected by the Nominating Committee would not have a contested election and would be recommended for appointment to the NAC.\22\
\20\ The Exchange states that the seven nonindustry members and two atlarge industry members would continue to follow the
nomination and Board appointment process currently employed for non industry and atlarge industry NAC members. See Notice, supra note 3, 73 FR at 56874, n. 14.
\21\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.3 (Appointments) and 5.5 (Rejection of Nominating Committee Nominee).
\22\ The proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws would continue to allow the Nominating Committee to propose two or more candidates for a single open small, midsize, or large firm NAC seat. See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.5 (Notice of Contested Nomination). In such a case, there would be a contested election. The proposed rule change would clarify that only when the Nominating Committee nominates two or more candidates for the same open seat would the Nominating Committee trigger a contested election.

Additionally, FINRA proposes to modify the provision that restricts NAC members and certain committees from communicating in an official capacity in support of a candidate in a contested election. The current provisions that permit individuals who are Directors or NAC or other committee members to communicate their views regarding a candidate in an individual capacity would remain the same. The modification would specify the narrow circumstances under which the Nominating Committee may support its candidate by sending a maximum of two mailings in support of its nominee.\23\ The proposal clarifies that this limited support is available during contested NAC elections by referring to support allowed ``under these ByLaws,'' which includes the support allowed under Article IV, Section 4.16.\24\
\23\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article IV, Section 4.16(b) (Communication of Views Regarding Contested Election or Nomination). Section 4.16(b) would also mirror the language of the FINRA ByLaw provision that allows, in contested elections, the appropriate FINRA committee to communicate a responsive message in reply to an additional candidate's communication. See FINRA ByLaws, Article VII, Section 11(b) (Communication of Views).
\24\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.6 (Administrative Support).

The proposed rule change would designate the Secretary of FINRA, instead of the FINRA Regulation Secretary, as the person who would: send notice to FINRA members announcing a contested NAC election; assist in preparing ballots; prepare a list of FINRA members eligible to vote; arrange for the location for counting of ballots by an independent agent; resolve ballots that were set aside, if necessary; extend a time period regarding elections for good cause; and perform similar duties.\25\
\25\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Sections 6.5, 6.7, 6.8, 6.10, 6.11, 6.13, and 6.14.

2. Other Changes

FINRA proposes to allow the NAC to continue to function while a vacancy is being filled. More specifically, the ByLaws would be changed to provide that a vacancy on the NAC lasting six months or less does not result in a violation of the compositional requirements of the NAC.

FINRA proposes to amend provisions of the ByLaws governing resignation, removal, appointment, and disqualification of NAC members and the NAC's authority to act on FINRA's behalf to designate the FINRA Board as the body authorized to oversee the NAC.\26\ Under the proposal, the FINRA Board would have authority to remove all NAC members (for refusal, failure, neglect, or inability to discharge duties), accept their resignations, appoint them, and declare them disqualified.
\26\ See current FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Sections 5.1 (Appointment and Authority), and proposed Sections 5.75.9.

The proposed rule change would eliminate the ByLaws provision that requires the Chair of the NAC to serve as a Director of the FINRA Regulation Board for a oneyear term.

The proposed rule change would modify the ByLaws' definition of ``Industry Member'' by limiting the lookback test that measures whether a NAC or committee member is considered ``industry.'' Currently, a person who has served as an officer, director, or employee of a broker or dealer, within the past three years is considered to be ``industry.'' The proposal would shorten that period to one year.

The proposal also would add the term ``independent director'' to the portion of the definition of ``Industry Member'' that excludes outside directors of a broker or dealer. According to FINRA, ``independent director'' is synonymous with outside director, but would be added to the exclusionary clause of the definition to harmonize the FINRA Regulation ByLaws with the FINRA ByLaws' use of the term ``independent director'' when defining an Industry Governor. In addition, the definitions of ``Public Director'' and ``Public Member,'' which refer to NAC or committee members, would be modified to clarify that, for example, a Public Director's service on FINRA Regulation's Board or a Public Member's service on the NAC does not disqualify that person from satisfying the definition of Public Director or Public Member.\27\
\27\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article I(hh) and (ii).

Finally, the proposed rule change would make certain non substantive changes to several articles of the FINRA Regulation ByLaws as follows:

II. Discussion and Commission's Findings

After careful review, including consideration of the comment letter received \28\ and FINRA's response thereto,\29\ the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
[[Page 68470]]
association.\30\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act,\31\ which requires that FINRA rules are designed to assure a fair representation of FINRA's members in the administration of its affairs. Additionally, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\32\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\28\ See supra note 4.
\29\ See letter from Carla Carloni, Associate Vice President, FINRA, to Florence E. Harmon, Acting Secretary, Commission, dated October 22, 2008, at 1 (``FINRA Response Letter'').
\30\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(4).
\32\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(6).
A. Changes to the NAC

1. Composition

FINRA proposes that the restructured NAC consist of 14 members, including seven industry members, two of whom will be ``at large'' and five of whom will be designated specifically as representatives of large firms, midsize firms, and small firms, and seven nonindustry members, three of whom are public.\33\ As noted above, the Commission received one letter regarding this proposal.\34\ The commenter expressed support for the proposal, although he noted a concern that NAC members no longer would be required to come from different geographic regions of the country. In response, FINRA stated that it will ``remain sensitive'' to the commenter's concern.\35\ FINRA also pointed out that, under the proposed nomination process, which is discussed further below, the District Nominating Committees, which currently select the five industry members on the NAC that come from the five geographic regions, are permitted to recommend candidates to the Nominating Committee.
\33\ A public member of the NAC has no material business relationship with a broker or dealer or a selfregulatory
organization registered under the Act.
\34\ See supra note 4.

\35\ See FINRA Response Letter, supra note 29.

The Commission finds that the proposed composition of the NAC satisfies the fair representation requirement of Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act because five of the 14 NAC members will be industry members, elected by member firms of similar size.\36\ The proposed rule change aligns the representation of industry members on the NAC to follow more closely the industry representation of the FINRA Board. Previously, the Commission found that the composition of the FINRA Board satisfies the fair representation requirement of Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act.\37\ \36\ See infra note 43 and accompanying text.
\37\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56145, supra note 5, 72 FR at 42182.

2. Nomination and Election

FINRA proposes that the Nominating Committee identify and solicit candidates for all NAC seats, including the five industrymember positions that are based on firm size. The Nominating Committee would be free to consult with and receive recommendations for industry NAC members from other FINRA committees, including the District Nominating Committees, before submitting nominees to the FINRA Board.

Under the proposed rule change, Additional Candidates would be: (a) Permitted to petition for consideration as Small, MidSize, or Large Firm NAC Members, based on the size of the firm with which they are registered; and (b) able to qualify for a contested election by gathering petitions from three percent of the firms in their size category. In the event of a contested election, FINRA members would have an opportunity to vote for a NAC candidate based on firm size.\38\ Specifically, small, midsize, or large firms would vote for NAC candidates only if the contested election was for a NAC seat designated for a firm of corresponding size.
\38\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.3 (List of FINRA Members Eligible to Vote) and Article VI, Section 6.7 (Ballots).

The proposed rule change authorizes the FINRA Secretary to collect information from candidates to determine that the nominee or Additional Candidate, as applicable, satisfies the definition of an Industry, Small Firm, MidSized Firm, Large Firm, NonIndustry, or Public Member of the NAC.\39\ The proposed rule change also ensures that the winner of a contested election would serve on the NAC. While all NAC members would continue to be recommended initially by the Nominating Committee and appointed by the FINRA Board,\40\ the candidate who receives the most votes in any contested election for a Small, MidSize, or Large Firm NAC Member seat would be required under the FINRA Regulation By Laws to be appointed to the NAC.\41\ FINRA does not propose to change the NAC selection process if no Additional Candidates reach the threshold to qualify for a contested election. When there are no additional candidates, the industry NAC members selected by the Nominating Committee would not have a contested election and would be recommended for appointment to the NAC.\42\
\39\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.4 (Nomination Process).
\40\ The seven nonindustry members and two atlarge industry members would continue to follow the nomination and Board
appointment process currently employed for nonindustry and atlarge industry NAC members.
\41\ See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article V, Section 5.3 (Appointments) and 5.5 (Rejection of Nominating Committee Nominee).
\42\ The proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws would continue to allow the Nominating Committee to propose two or more candidates for a single open small, midsize, or large firm NAC seat. See proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.5 (Notice of Contested Nomination). In such a case, there would be a contested election. The proposed rule change would clarify that only when the Nominating Committee nominates two or more candidates for the same open seat would the Nominating Committee trigger a contested election.

The Commission finds that the proposed petition process, coupled with the proposed ByLaw provisions on the NAC's composition, also are consistent with the fair representation requirement of Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act. As noted above, the Commission previously approved a proposed rule change relating to the composition of the FINRA Board that similarly provided firms with the right to petition for and vote on FINRA Board candidates industry members, according to firm size.\43\ The Commission also notes that FINRA's proposal to permit Additional Candidates to qualify for a contested election by gathering petitions from three percent of the firms in their size category (or ten percent in the case of petitions in support of more than one person) is lower than the ten percent threshold that has been in place under the ByLaws to qualify a FINRA member as an Additional Candidate for a regional NAC seat.\44\
\43\ See supra note 37.
\44\ Compare current FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.15 (Requirement for Petition Supporting Additional Candidate) with proposed FINRA Regulation ByLaws, Article VI, Section 6.2 (Designation of Additional Candidates).

In addition, FINRA proposes to: (a) The narrow circumstances under which the Nominating Committee may support its candidate by sending a maximum of two mailings in support of its nominee; and (b) assign to the Secretary of FINRA the duties of sending notice to FINRA members announcing a contested NAC election, assisting in preparing ballots; preparing a list of FINRA members eligible to vote, arranging for the location for counting of ballots by an independent agent; resolving ballots that were set aside, as necessary,
[[Page 68471]]
extending a time period regarding elections for good cause, and similar duties. The Commission finds that these proposals are consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\45\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\45\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(6).

3. Other Changes

FINRA proposes to allow NAC to continue to function for a period of 6 months or less while a vacancy is being filled.

FINRA proposes to broaden the FINRA Board's oversight authority over the NAC.\46\ The proposed rule change grants the FINRA Board authority to remove all NAC members (for refusal, failure, neglect, or inability to discharge duties), accept their resignations, appoint them, and declare them disqualified. FINRA believes that this change will benefit the appellate portion of the disciplinary process.\47\ \46\ The authority of the FINRA Board to establish disciplinary procedures, impose sanctions, and review disciplinary decisions of the NAC are discussed in the Notice. See Notice, supra note 3, 73 FR at 56875.

\47\ See id.

The proposed rule change eliminates the reference to the Chair of the NAC serving as a Director of the FINRA Regulation Board for a one year term. FINRA explains that this provision is obsolete because the NAC Chair is no longer an automatic member of the FINRA Regulation Board.

FINRA proposes to narrow the pool of people qualified to be an ``Industry Member,'' requiring that a person who has served as an officer, director, or employee of a broker or dealer, within the past year (instead of three years) is considered to be ``industry.'' The proposed change is consistent with the definitions of ``Industry Governor'' and ``Industry committee member'' in the FINRA ByLaws.\48\ \48\ See FINRA ByLaws, Article I(t).

The proposal also adds the term ``independent director'' to the portion of the definition of ``Industry Member'' that excludes outside directors of a broker or dealer. FINRA states that the goal of this proposal is to harmonize use of the term ``independent director'' when defining an Industry Governor in the FINRA Regulation ByLaws and the FINRA ByLaws.

In addition, FINRA would modify the qualifications for ``Public Director'' and ``Public Member.'' Currently, only someone with no material business relationship with a broker, dealer, or the NASD, NASD Regulation, or a market for which NASD provides regulation is eligible for those positions. Alternatively, FINRA proposes to require that Public Directors and Public Members have no material business relationship with a broker, dealer, or a self regulatory organization registered under the Act (``SRO''), provided that service as a public director of an SRO or as a public member on an SRO committee is not disqualifying.

Finally, FINRA proposes to make the following nonsubstantive replacements in the FINRA Regulation ByLaws:

The Commission finds that these proposed changes are consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\49\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\49\ 15 U.S.C. 78o3(b)(6).

III. Conclusion

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\50\ that the proposed rule change (SRFINRA2008046) be, and it hereby is, approved.

\50\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\51\
\51\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E827249 Filed 111708; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P