For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
\16\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E827757 Filed 112008; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P

SUMMARY: NYSE Arca, Inc.,

DOCUMENT BODY 2: November 14, 2008.

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on October 28, 2008, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or ``Exchange''), through its wholly owned subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca Equities'' or the ``Corporation''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as constituting a ``noncontroversial'' rule change under Rule 19b4(f)(6) under the Act.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities Rule 6.17 governing the AntiMoney Laundering Compliance Program (``AMLCP''). The proposed rule change would clarify the frequency with which an Equities Trading Permit (``ETP'') Holder must conduct independent testing of its AMLCP and would establish the qualifications of the person designated to perform AMLCP testing as well as provide guidelines for establishing the independence of the person performing the test. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http:// www.nyse.com, at the Exchange's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose

Financial institutions, including brokerdealers, must develop and implement AML Programs pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act (``BSA''),\5\ as amended by Section 352 of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (``PATRIOT Act'').\6\ Consistent with Department of Treasury regulation 31 CFR 103.120 under the BSA, Exchange Rule 6.17 requires that each member organization develop and implement a written antimoney laundering (``AML'') AML program that specifies the minimum requirement for these programs.
\5\ 31 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.

\6\ Public Law 10756, 115 Stat. 272 (2001).

The AML program must include the development of internal policies, procedures and controls; the designation of a person to implement and monitor the daytoday operations and internal controls of the program (commonly referred to as an ``AML Officer''); ongoing training for appropriate persons; and an independent testing function for overall compliance.

The Exchange proposes to change NYSE Arca Equities Rule 6.17(c) to clarify the language governing the frequency with which an ETP Holder must conduct independent testing of its AntiMoney Laundering Compliance Program (``AMLCP''). Additionally, the Exchange proposes to add new commentary to Rule 6.17(c) that establishes qualifications of the person designated to perform AMLCP testing and guidelines for establishing the independence of the person performing the test. Timeframes for Independent Testing

The proposed rule change would require that independent testing of AML programs be conducted, at a minimum, on an annual (calendaryear) basis by ETP Holders, unless the ETP Holder does not execute transactions for
[[Page 70690]]
customers or otherwise hold customer accounts or act as an introducing broker with respect to customer accounts (e.g., engages solely in proprietary trading, or conducts business only with other broker dealers), in which case such independent testing is required every two years (on a calendaryear basis). The Exchange believes that these timeframes are reasonable in that they require more frequent testing of AML programs designed to monitor a business with customers from the general public, which may be more susceptible to money laundering schemes than a strictly proprietary business involving transactions with other brokerdealers. Furthermore, the oneyear time frame for testing is consistent with standard industry practice in that it is similar to generally accepted guidelines for conducting tests in the context of, for instance, general audits and branch office visits. The proposed rule change establishes only a minimum requirement, and makes clear that members should undertake more frequent testing when circumstances warrant (e.g., should the business mix of the member or member organization materially change; in the event of a merger or acquisition; in light of systemic weaknesses uncovered via testing of the AML Program; or in response to other ``red flags'').

Qualification and Independence Standards for Testing

Additionally, the Exchange proposes to add Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 6.17 in order to establish qualifications for the person designated to perform AMLCP testing as well as guidelines for establishing the independence of the person performing the test. The proposed rule change would require the person conducting the independent test to have a working knowledge of the applicable BSA requirements and related regulations. Such person need not be an employee of the member or member organization since the responsibility being delegated is essentially an auditing function and, as such, it would not be unusual or ineffective for it to be performed by an independent outside party.

The proposed rule change does not preclude an employee of the member or member organization from conducting the required independent testing of the AML Program; however the proposed ``independence'' standard would prohibit testing from being conducted by a person who performs the functions being tested, or by the designated AML Officer or by a person that reports to either.

AML Officer

The proposed rule change would also clarify that the person responsible for implementing and monitoring the daytoday operations and controls of the program must be an associated person of the member. This would not prohibit a member that is part of a diversified financial institution from designating an AML Officer that is employed by the member's parent company, sister company, or other affiliate. However, if such a person is designated as a member's AML Officer, the Exchange will consider that person to be an associated person of the member with respect to those activities performed on behalf of the member.

2. Statutory Basis

The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) \7\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Exchange Act''), in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \8\ in particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to accomplish these ends by requiring members to conduct periodic tests of their AML compliance programs and preserve the independence of their testing personnel. \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action

The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) \9\ of the Act and Rule 19b4(f)(6) \10\ thereunder. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest, (ii) impose any significant burden on competition, and (iii) will not become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.\11\

Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii) \12\ requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the Exchange's intent to file a proposed rule change along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. The Exchange also requests that the Commission waive the 30day operative delay contained in Exchange Act Rule 19b4(f)(6).\13\ The Exchange believes that waiver of the 30day operative delay will allow the Exchange to immediately begin requiring members to conduct periodic tests of their AMLCP and preserve the independence of their testing personnel. The Commission believes that waiving the 30day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Commission believes that the proposed rule is designed to accomplish these ends by requiring ETP Holders to conduct periodic testing of their AMLCPs, preserve the independence of their testing personnel, and by making the Exchange's program requirements consistent with those at other exchanges and selfregulatory organizations.\14\ The Commission therefore grants the Exchange's request and designates the proposal to be operative upon filing.\15\
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6)(iii).
\13\ Id.
\14\ See e.g., NASD Rule 3011, NYSE Rule 445.
\15\ For purposes of waiving the 30day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing,
[[Page 70691]]
including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
\16\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E827757 Filed 112008; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801101P