Federal Register: June 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 112)
DOCID: fr12jn09-25 FR Doc E9-13865
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Federal Communications Commission
CFR Citation: 47 CFR Part 73
Docket ID: [MM Docket No. 99-325; DA 09-1127]
NOTICE: PROPOSED RULES
DOCID: fr12jn09-25
DOCUMENT ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUBJECT CATEGORY:
FM Digital Power Increase and Associated Technical Studies
DATES: Comments for this proceeding are due on or before July 6, 2009. Reply comments are due on or before July 17, 2009.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY:
In this document, the Federal Communications Commission seeks comment on four issues, discussed below in the Synopsis, that are related to a request by certain private parties, identified below, that the technical specifications for FM digital audio broadcasting (``DAB'') set forth in the Commission's rules be amended to increase the maximum permissible operating power from the current level of 1 percent of a station's authorized analog power (20 dB) up to a maximum of 10 percent of a station's authorized analog power (10 dB). This document establishes a period for public comment on these issues and on two related technical studies.
SUMMARY:
FM Digital Power Increase and Associated Technical Studies
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
This is a summary of a Public Notice released by
[[Page 27986]]
the Media Bureau on May 22, 2009. The full text of this document is
available for public inspection and copying during regular business
hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445
12th Street, SW., Room CYA257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text
of this document also may be purchased from the Commission's copy
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CYB402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (202) 4885300,
facsimile (202) 4885563 or via email FCC@BCPIWEB.com. The full text
may also be downloaded at: http://www.fcc.gov. Pursuant to Sec. Sec.
1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419,
interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before
the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be
filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by
filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by firstclass or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 2024180530 (Voice), 202 4180432 (TTY).
Summary of Public Notice
On October 23, 2008, the Media Bureau released the ``October 23, 2008, Public Notice'' soliciting comment on both a request filed June 10, 2008, asking the Commission to modify the technical specifications for FM digital audio broadcasting (DAB), and on two related technical studies. Comment Sought on Joint Parties Request for FM Digital Power Increase and Associated Technical Studies, MM Docket No. 99325, Public Notice, DA 082340 (MB rel. Oct. 23, 2008). The request was filed by a group consisting of 18 broadcasters that operate over 1200 commercial and noncommercial educational (``NCE'') FM radio stations throughout the United States and the 4 largest manufacturers of broadcast transmission equipment, collectively identifying themselves as the ``Joint Parties.'' The Joint Parties requested that the Commission increase the maximum permissible digital operating power of FM stations from the current level of 1 percent of a station's authorized analog power (20 dB) to a maximum of 10 percent of a station's authorized analog power (10 dB) (the ``Joint Parties' Request'').
The October 23, 2008, Public Notice also sought comment on two related technical studies. Filed concurrently with and in support of the Joint Parties' Request was a technical report prepared by iBiquity Digital Corporation (``iBiquity''). In addition, National Public Radio (``NPR'') submitted on July 18, 2008, its Corporation for Public Broadcasting (``CPB'')supported research on digital radio coverage and interference. The October 23, 2008, Public Notice sought comment on the Joint Parties' Request and these related technical studies.
Developments since the release of the October 23, 2008, Public
Notice prompt the solicitation of further public comment. Specifically,
in response to the October 23, 2008, Public Notice, the Media Bureau
has received comments and reply comments both supporting and opposing
the Joint Parties' Request. The Joint Parties have urged the Commission
to move expeditiously on its request to ameliorate the coverage
shortfalls and reception difficulties that result from digital
transmissions at currently authorized power levels. NPR has announced
the commencement of additional CPBsupported testing of FM DAB. NPR,
NPR Labs Launches CPBFunded Study on Power Increase for HD Radio
(press release), http://www.npr.org/about/press/2009/
040209.CPBLabs.html, Apr. 2, 2009. See also NPR ex parte filings, MM
Docket No. 99325. NPR states that its additional testing will result
in a recommendation of the amount of power increase needed to improve
digital radio coverage while also protecting analog FM signals,
including subcarrier transmissions, from interference. The study also
proposes to consider the minimum spacing distances needed to protect
analog signals from higher powered digital operations. NPR states that
the findings of its study will be presented in September 2009. Letter
from Gregory A. Lewis, Counsel for NPR, to Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, FCC, Attach. (Mar. 30, 2009). In response to the record
before the Commission, as well as NPR's plans for additional testing of
FM DAB, the Media Bureau solicits further comment on the previously
submitted iBiquity and NPR technical studies and on the following
issues: (1) Whether the Bureau should defer consideration of the Joint
Parties' requested power increase until the completion of and comment
on the further NPR studies; (2) whether the record in this proceeding,
the real world experience gained from over 1,400 FM stations operating
for several years in the hybrid mode and the record of experimental
authorizations at higher digital power levels warrant an increase in
maximum digital operating power as proposed by the Joint Parties or support a provisional power increase of some lesser extent
[[Page 27987]]
than that requested by the Joint Parties; (3) if the Commission does
adopt a power increase, whether it should also establish standards to
ensure the lack of interference to the analog signals of stations
operating on first adjacent channels; and whether such standards should
apply to, i.e., require the protection of, LPFM stations operating on
first adjacent channels; and (4) if the Commission does adopt a power
increase, whether it should also establish more explicit procedures to resolve digitalintoanalog interference complaints.
The Joint Parties' Request and the iBiquity and NPR technical studies are available electronically at http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov//prod/ ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi under MM Docket No. 99325, or from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (``BCPI''), 445 12th Street, SW., Room CYB402, Washington, DC 20554, 18003783160. The Media Bureau seeks comment on the issues identified above. The Bureau also seeks comment on the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis below. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sec. Sec. 0.61 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 0.61, 0.283, and the Second Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 10383, ] 99.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposal under consideration may result in a new or revised information collection requirement being adopted by the Commission when the final rules are adopted. If the Commission adopts any new or revised information collection requirement, the Commission will publish a separate notice in the Federal Register inviting the public to comment on the requirement, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 10413 (44 U.S.C. 35013520). In addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the Commission will seek specific comment on how it might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.''
Ex Parte Restrictions
This proceeding has been designated ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 CFR 1.12001.1216. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in 47 CFR 1.1206 applicable to nonrestricted proceedings.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
1. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended (RFA),\1\ the Commission has prepared this present Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the
policies and rules proposed. Written public comments are requested on
this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and
must be filed by the deadlines for comments on the proposed rule as
provided in the ``Dates'' paragraph of the item. The Commission will
send a copy of the proposed rule, including this IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA).\2\ In
addition, the proposed rule and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published in the Federal Register.\3\
\1\ See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601612, has been
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA), Public Law 104121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). \2\ See 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
\3\ See id.
A. Need for and Objectives of the Proposed Rules
2. This document seeks comment on issues, discussed infra in paragraph 4, concerning the Joint Parties' proposed increase in maximum permissible digital operating power for FM stations utilizing DAB from the current level of 1 percent of a station's authorized analog power (20 dB) up to a maximum of 10 percent of a station's authorized analog power (10 dB). The proposed voluntary increase by FM stations to any digital power level up to 10% of a station's authorized analog power would serve to facilitate the ability of FM stations to achieve digital replication of their analog signals and to overcome inbuilding digital reception problems.
3. This document seeks comment on relevant technical studies submitted by iBiquity and NPR. The iBiquity study, filed in support of the Joint Parties' Request, examined the benefits to digital broadcasting, the compatibility with analog broadcasting, and the potential interference effects resulting from the proposed increase in maximum permissible FM digital operating power. The iBiquity study concluded that an increase in authorized FM digital power levels to 10 percent of a station's authorized analog power would significantly improve digital coverage while avoiding, in the majority of instances, increased interference to reception of analog signals of FM stations operating on first adjacent channels. The NPR study concluded that, although such an increase in authorized FM digital power levels would improve digital coverage in most instances, it could also result in substantial interference to reception of the analog signals of FM stations operating on first and second adjacent channels, and that further testing would be necessary to determine if increased digital operating power should be permitted for FM stations.
4. In response to the record before the Commission in MM Docket 99
325, as well as NPR's announced plans for additional testing of FM
DAB,\4\ the Media Bureau also solicits comment on the following issues:
(1) Whether the Bureau should defer consideration of the Joint Parties'
requested power increase until the completion of and comment on the
further NPR studies; (2) whether the record in this proceeding, the
real world experience gained from over 1,400 FM stations operating for
several years in the hybrid mode and the record of experimental
authorizations at higher digital power levels warrant an increase in
maximum digital operating power as proposed by the Joint Parties or
support a provisional power increase of some lesser extent than that
requested by the Joint Parties; (3) if the Commission does adopt a
power increase, whether it should also establish standards to ensure
the lack of interference to the analog signals of stations operating on
first adjacent channels, and whether such standards should apply to,
i.e., require the protection of, LPFM stations operating on first
adjacent channels; and (4) if the Commission does adopt a power
increase, whether it should also establish more explicit procedures to resolve digitalintoanalog interference complaints.
\4\ See Letter from Gregory A. Lewis, Counsel for NPR, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (Mar. 30, 2009).
B. Legal Basis
5. The authority for this notice is contained in\\ Sections 1, 2,
4(i) and (j), 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, and 309 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i) and (j), 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, and 309.
C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply
6. The RFA directs the Commission to provide a description of and,
where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that will be affected by the
[[Page 27988]]
proposed rules.\5\ The RFA generally defines the term ``small entity''
as encompassing the terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,''
and ``small governmental entity.'' \6\ In addition, the term ``small
business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern''
under the Small Business Act.\7\ A small business concern is one which:
(1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its
field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the Small Business Administration (``SBA'').\8\ The
proposed rules and policies potentially will apply to all FM radio broadcasting licensees and potential licensees.
\5\ 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3).
\6\ 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
\7\ 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition
of ``small business concern'' in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 601(3), the statutory definition of a
small business applies ``unless an agency, after consultation with
the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and
after opportunity for public comment, establishes one or more
definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of
the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register.''
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 632.
7. The SBA defines a radio broadcasting station that has $7 million
or less in annual receipts as a small business.\9\ A radio broadcasting
station is an establishment primarily engaged in broadcasting aural
programs by radio to the public.\10\ Included in this industry are
commercial, religious, educational, and other radio stations.\11\ Radio
broadcasting stations which primarily are engaged in radio broadcasting
and which produce radio program materials are similarly included.\12\
However, radio stations that are separate establishments and are
primarily engaged in producing radio program material are classified
under a separate NAICS number.\13\ According to Commission staff review
of the BIA Financial Network, Inc. Media Access Radio Analyzer Database
as of February 19, 2009, about 10,600 (96 percent) of 11,050 commercial
radio stations in the United States have revenues of $7 million or
less. We note that many radio stations are affiliated with much larger
corporations having much higher revenue. Our estimate, therefore,
likely overstates the number of small entities that might be affected by our action.
\9\ See 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 515112 (changed from 513112 in October 2002).
\10\ Id.
\11\ Id.
\12\ Id.
\13\ Id.
D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements
8. In the Second Report and Order, the Commission declined to
establish a deadline for radio stations to convert to digital
broadcasting, 22 FCC Rcd at 10351. Presently, radio stations may choose
to commence DAB operation pursuant to Section 73.404 of the
Commission's rules, 47 CFR 73.404, which requires in part that
licensees provide notification to the Commission within 10 days of
commencing DAB operation. The proposed rule change may impose
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on FM radio stations
choosing to upgrade DAB operating power above the current limitation of
1 percent of a station's authorized analog power. For example,
licensees choosing to increase DAB operating power above 1 percent of
authorized analog power could be required to notify the Commission of the increase in power.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
9. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small
entities.\14\ This document has proposed for commenter evaluation the
issue of taking steps to minimize significant impact on small entities,
focusing on the four issues, enumerated supra in paragraph 6, relevant
to the Joint Parties' Request, as well as on any issues raised by the
technical studies previously submitted by iBiquity and NPR. To assist
in the analysis, commenters are requested to provide information,
studies, and/or opinions regarding how small entities would be affected
if the Commission were to adopt an increase in maximum digital
operating power as proposed by the Joint Parties or a provisional power
increase of some lesser extent than that requested by the Joint
Parties, and whether such adoption could result in the disparate
treatment of small entities with limited financial and/or technical
resources. Commenters should also provide information, studies, and/or
opinions on alternative approaches to alleviate any potential burdens on small entities.
\14\ 5 U.S.C. 603(b).
F. Federal Rules Which Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With, the Commission's Proposals
10. None.
Federal Communications Commission.
Robert H. Ratcliffe,
Acting Chief, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E913865 Filed 61109; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 671201P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Peter H. Doyle, Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, at (202) 4182700.