The Federal Register

Certain Folding Gift Boxes From the People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative

Tue, Dec 23 2003 11:00:00 GMT

On October 10, 2003, the Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain folding gift boxes from the People's Republic of China. The review covers two manufacturers/exporters and the period of review is August 6, 2001, through December 31, 2002. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results of review but received no comments. Therefore, these final results of review do not differ from the preliminary results of review.

Gray Portland Cement and Clinker From Mexico; Notice of Extraordinary Challenge Committee's Final Decision and

Tue, Dec 23 2003 11:00:00 GMT

On October 30, 2003, the Extraordinary Challenge Committee issued its decision to deny the Department of Commerce's April 13, 2000, extraordinary challenge petition with respect to a determination made by the Binational Panel in the final results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on gray portland cement and clinker from Mexico covering the period August 1, 1994, through July 31, 1995. As there is now a final and conclusive decision in this case, we are amending the amended final results of review and we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to liquidate entries subject to this review.

Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Preliminary Results and Rescission in Part of Antidumping

Tue, Dec 23 2003 11:00:00 GMT

In response to requests from Indian producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain hotrolled carbon steel flat products (HRS) from India. The review covers one producer/exporter of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR), May 3, 2001, through November 30, 2002. The Department has preliminarily determined that no dumping margin exists for the manufacturer/exporter during the POR. If these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of administrative review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties as appropriate. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

Notice of Amended Antidumping Duty Order; Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From The Netherlands

Tue, Dec 23 2003 11:00:00 GMT

On November 29, 2001, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the antidumping duty order on certain hotrolled carbon steel flat products (hotrolled steel) from the Netherlands. See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain HotRolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From the Netherlands, 66 FR 59565 (November 29, 2001). As a result of the Court of International Trade's (the Court's) decisions in Corus Staal BV, et al. v. United States, 283 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (CIT 2003) (Corus Staal BV III) and Corus Staal BV, et al. v. United States, 279 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (CIT 2003) (Corus Staal BV II), we are publishing this notice of amended antidumping duty order.

Silicon Metal From Brazil: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

Tue, Dec 23 2003 11:00:00 GMT

On August 22, 2003, in response to a request made by the petitioners \1\, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published a notice of initiation of an antidumping duty administrative review of silicon metal from Brazil, for the period of review (POR) July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2003. Because the petitioners have withdrawn their request for review, and there were no other requests for review for this time period, the Department is rescinding this review in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213 (d)(1).
\1\ The petitioners are Elkem Metals Company and Globe Metallurgical Inc.

Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

Tue, Dec 23 2003 11:00:00 GMT

Pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether an instrument of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instrument shown below is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States.

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington,
[[Page 74217]]
DC 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Suite 4100W, U.S. Department of Commerce, Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Docket Number: 03054. Applicant: Frostburg State University, Department of Biology, 101 Braddock Road, Compton Science Center, Frostburg, MD 21532. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM1011. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The instrument is