<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>

<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Federal Register</title>
    <link>http://thefederalregister.com/b.p/department/DEPARTMENT_OF_JUSTICE/2003-12-17/</link>
    <description>Daily Publications of Meetings and Rules Changes for the Federal Government</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, May 20 2013 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, May 20 2013 11:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <webMaster>info@thefederalregister.com</webMaster>
    <item>
  <title><![CDATA[  United States v. Alcan Inc., Alcan Aluminum Corp., Pechiney,  S.A., and Pechiney Rolled Products, LLC; Complaint,]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-12-17-03-31055</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and 
Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, 
Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, and Competitive Impact Statement 
have been filed with the United States District Court for the District 
of Columbia in United States v. Alcan, Inc., Alcan Aluminum Corp., 
Pechiney, S.A., and Pechiney Rolled Products, LLC, No. 1:03 CV 02012  (GK).</p><p>    On September 29, 2003, the United States filed a Complaint alleging 
that Alcan's proposed acquisition of Pechiney would violate section 7 
of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18, by substantially lessening 
competition in development, production, and sale of brazing sheet in 
North America. Brazing sheet is an aluminum alloy used to make heat 
exchangers (e.g., radiators, heaters, and air conditioners) for motor 
vehicles. The proposed Final Judgment, filed simultaneously with the 
Complaint, requires the defendants to divest Pechiney's brazing sheet 
business to a person acceptable to the Uni<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-12-17-03-31055</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, Dec 17 2003 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  United States and the State of Florida v. Waste Management, Inc.,  and Allied Waste Industries, Inc.; Complaint,]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-12-17-03-31053</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and 
Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)(h), that a Complaint, proposed Final 
Judgment, Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, and Competitive Impact 
Statement were filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of 
Columbia in United States and State of Florida v. Waste Management, 
Inc., and Allied Waste Industries, Inc., Civ. Action No. 1:03CV02076. 
On October 14, 2003, the United States and the State of Florida filed a 
Complaint, which sought to enjoin Waste Management, Inc. (``Waste 
Management'') from acquiring certain small container commercial hauling 
assets in Broward County, Florida from Allied Waste Industries, Inc. 
(``Allied''). The Complaint alleged that Waste Management's acquisition 
of these small container commercial hauling assets from Allied would 
substantially lessen competition resulting in higher prices for small 
container commercial hauling services in Broward County, Florida in 
violation of the Clayton Act, as amen<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-12-17-03-31053</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, Dec 17 2003 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  United States and New Jersey v. Waste Management, Inc. and Allied  Waste Industries, Inc.; Public Comments and]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-12-17-03-31054</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 2(d) of the Antitrust 
Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(d), that the Public Comments 
and Plaintiff's Response thereto have been filed with the United States 
District Court for the District of Columbia in United States and New 
Jersey v. Waste Management, Inc. and Allied Waste Industries, Inc.,  Civil No. 1:03CV01409 (GK).</p><p>    On June 27, 2003, the United States and the State of New Jersey 
filed a civil antitrust Complaint alleging that Waste Management's 
acquisition of certain voting securities and wastehauling and disposal 
assets of Allied would lessen competition substantially in the 
provision of small container commercial waste collection services in 
the areas of Pitkin County, Colorado; Garfield County, Colorado; 
Augusta, Georgia; Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Morris County, New 
Jersey; and Bergen and Passaic Counties, New Jersey, and in the 
provision of municipal solid waste disposal services in the Bergen and 
Passaic Counties, New Jers<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-12-17-03-31054</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, Dec 17 2003 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Record of Vote of Meeting Closure (Public Law 94-409) (5 U.S.C.  Sec. 552b)]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-12-17-03-31188</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    I, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Chairman of the United States Parole 
Commission, was present at a meeting of said Commission, which started 
at approximately 10:45 a.m. on Thursday, December 11, 2003, at the U.S. 
Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, 
Maryland 20815. The purpose of the meeting was to decide one petition 
for reconsideration pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27. Three Commissioners were 
present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was  submitted.</p><p>    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be 
closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Edward F. Reilly, Jr., John R. Simpson, and  Cranston J. Mitchell.</p><p>    In witness whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-12-17-03-31188</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, Dec 17 2003 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

