<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>

<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Federal Register</title>
    <link>http://thefederalregister.com/b.p/department/INTERNATIONAL_TRADE_COMMISSION/2005-11-29/</link>
    <description>Daily Publications of Meetings and Rules Changes for the Federal Government</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, Dec 4 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, Dec 4 2008 11:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <webMaster>info@thefederalregister.com</webMaster>
    <item>
  <title><![CDATA[
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp and Prawns From India and  Thailand]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-11-29-E5-6593</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Determinations</p><p>    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject  investigations, the United<br/> [[Page 71558]]<br/>
States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant 
to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675d(b)) (the 
Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders covering certain 
frozen warmwater shrimp and prawns from India and Thailand would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States. Certain frozen warmwater shrimp and 
prawns from India and Thailand are provided for in subheadings 
0306.13.00 and 1605.20.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the  United States.<br/>
    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's  Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).</p>
<h3>Background</h3>
<p>    On December 17, 2004, the Department of Commerce determined that 
imports of certain frozen and canned warmwater shrimp and prawns from 
India and Thailand are being sold in the United States at less t<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-11-29-E5-6593</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, Nov 29 2005 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[
In the Matter of Certain Ink Markers and Packaging Thereof;  Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and a Cease and]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-11-29-C5-21591</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Correction</p><p>    In notice document 0521591 appearing on page 62328 in the issue of  Monday, October 31, 2005, make the following correction:</p><p>    On page 62328, in the first column, the docket number is corrected  to read as set forth above.<br/> [FR Doc. C521591 Filed 112805; 8:45 am]<br/>
BILLING CODE 150501D
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-11-29-C5-21591</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, Nov 29 2005 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

