<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>

<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Federal Register</title>
    <link>http://thefederalregister.com/b.p/department/INTERNATIONAL_TRADE_COMMISSION/2005-12-08/</link>
    <description>Daily Publications of Meetings and Rules Changes for the Federal Government</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, Dec 4 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, Dec 4 2008 11:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <webMaster>info@thefederalregister.com</webMaster>
    <item>
  <title><![CDATA[
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy and Japan]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-12-08-E5-7024</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Determinations</p><p>    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in these subject fiveyear 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
orders on granular polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Italy and Japan 
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material 
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably  foreseeable time.\2\<br/>
    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's  Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).<br/>
    \2\ Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and Commissioner Daniel R. 
Pearson dissent with regard to the determination concerning Japan. Background</p><p>    On December 1, 2004, the Commission determined that responses to 
its notice of institution of the subject fiveyear reviews were such 
that full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act should 
proceed (69 FR 69954, December <script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-12-08-E5-7024</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, Dec 8 2005 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[
In the Matter of Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes  and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-12-08-E5-7076</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on November 4, 2005, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC of San Jose, California. A supplemental 
letter was filed on November 23, 2005. The complaint alleges violations 
of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain highbrightness light emitting diodes and products containing 
same by reason of infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,008,718, claims 13, 89, 16, 18, and 2328 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,376,580, and claims 1216 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316. The complaint 
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as  required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.</p><p>    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent limited 
exclusion or<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-12-08-E5-7076</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, Dec 8 2005 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[
In the Matter of Certain Personal Computers, Monitors, and  Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision to]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-12-08-E5-7026</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade  Commission has determined to reviewinpart the presiding <br/>
administrative law judge's (``ALJ's'') initial determination (``ID'') 
issued on October 6, 2005, in the abovecaptioned investigation and to 
remand portions of the investigation to the ALJ to make additional 
factual findings and determinations.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-12-08-E5-7026</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, Dec 8 2005 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[
Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet From Japan ]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-12-08-E5-7083</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a full 
review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the 
antidumping duty order on tin and chromiumcoated steel sheet from 
Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material 
injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information 
concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, 
consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, 
subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, 
and F (19 CFR part 207).
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2005-12-08-E5-7083</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, Dec 8 2005 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

