Years: 20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013

Pages: 12345>»

11  PROPOSED RULES: Montana,

EPA is proposing to disapprove a State Implementation Plan revision submitted by the State of Montana on January 16, 2003. This revision provides existing aluminum plants an exemption to meeting emission limits during scheduled maintenance. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.

12  RULES: Prevention of significant deterioration; approval and promulgation of

This final action revises implementation plans concerning the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program mandated by part C of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). These revisions include changes to incorporate newly promulgated paragraphs in the Federal PSD rule into the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) portion of the State plan

13  PROPOSED RULES: Indiana,

The EPA is proposing to conditionally approve rules submitted by the State of Indiana as revisions to its State Implementation Plan(SIP) for prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) provisions for attainment areas for the Indiana Department of Environmental Management.

In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA

14  PROPOSED RULES: Maryland,

EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland for the purpose of establishing two (2) amendments to COMAR 26.11.19, from specific processes on volatile organic compound (VOC) requirements. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a

15  PROPOSED RULES: Maryland,

EPA proposes to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Maryland. The revisions amend provisions to Maryland's regulations for Permits, Approvals, and Registration and related changes to its regulations for General Emission Standards, Prohibitions, and Restrictions, and Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific

16  PROPOSED RULES: California,

EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) and the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District (MBUAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The ICAPCD revision concerns the emission of particulate matter (PM10) from agricultural burning. The MBUAPCD revision

17  PROPOSED RULES: Louisiana,

We, the EPA, are proposing to take direct final action to approve a revision to the Louisiana SIP for Beauregard, St. Mary, Lafayette, and Grant Parishes and the New Orleans Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) ozone maintenance areas. The revision involves changes to the approved contingency plans.

18  PROPOSED RULES: Tennessee,

EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Tennessee State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on March 19, 2002, that contains transportation conformity rules. If EPA approves this transportation conformity SIP revision, the State will be able to implement and enforce the Federal transportation conformity requirements at the State level per

19  RULES: Kansas,

EPA is taking final action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the state of Kansas. The purpose of this revision is to delete the Wyandotte County Air Pollution Control Regulations from the FederallyApproved Regulations. These regulations were originally incorporated
[[Page 34544]]
into the SIP to assure that

20  RULES: Texas,

The EPA is approving, through direct final action, a revision to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to show attainment of the Carbon Monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in the El Paso CO nonattainment area, but for emissions emanating from outside of the United States. The EPA is also approving the El Paso

Years: 20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013

Pages: 12345>»