200020012002200320042005200620072008
Pages:
12345>»
PROPOSED RULES: Virginia,
Published: 2003-01-07
EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia. EPA is proposing
approval of substantive and format changes to Virginia's general
administrative provisions and definitions, reorganization and
recodification of the general conformity requirements and provisions,
recodification of
RULES: Colorado,
Published: 2003-01-31
EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Governor of Colorado on November 5, 1999. The November
5, 1999 submittal exempts military training exercises at the United
States Army Installation Fort Carson and United States Army Pinon
Canyon Maneuver Site (PCMS) from opacity limits. The intended effect of
this action
RULES: Connecticut,
Published: 2003-02-27
EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP). The revisions include new provisions that implement the core
requirements of 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) regarding
nonattainment New Source Review (NSR) in areas that have not attained
the National
RULES: California,
Published: 2003-03-24
EPA is finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval
of a revision to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District
(ICAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
This action was proposed in the Federal Register on November 20, 2002,
and concerns particulate matter (PM10) emissions from emission units,
electrical
Part V: Environmental Protection Agency,
Published: 2003-04-18
EPA is taking final action to approve state implementation
plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of California to provide
for attainment of the particulate matter (PM10) national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) in the Los AngelesSouth Coast Air Basin Area
and to establish emissions budgets for purposes of transportation
conformity. EPA
RULES: Utah,
Published: 2003-05-15
EPA is taking direct final action approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the Governor of Utah
on September 7, 1999 and February 11, 2003. The September 7, 1999
submittal revises Utah's Air Conservation Regulations (UACR) by
repealing and reenacting the Continuous Emission Monitoring Program
(CEM) rule in order to clarify
RULES: North Carolina,
Published: 2003-06-06
On April 16, 2001, the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources submitted revisions to the North
Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP). Addressed in this rulemaking
is a revision to rule 15 NCAC 2D .0521. The purpose of this revision is
to make the revised regulations consistent with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act
PROPOSED RULES: Colorado,
Published: 2003-06-30
EPA is proposing to take direct final action approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Governor of
Colorado on July 31, 2002. The July 31, 2002 submittal revises Colorado
Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) Common Provisions Regulation by
adding a credible evidence rule. The intended effect of this action is
to make
PROPOSED RULES: Maryland,
Published: 2003-08-06
EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)
on November 6, 2002. The revision amends Regulations .02, .03, and .05.
under COMAR 26.11.06General Emission Standards, Prohibitions and
Restrictions. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA
is
RULES: Minnesota,
Published: 2003-09-02
The Environmental Protection Agency is approving a site-
specific revision to the Minnesota particulate matter (PM) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for Lafarge Corporation's (Lafarge) facility
located on Red Rock Road in Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. By
its submittal dated July 18, 2002, the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA)
RULES: Texas,
Published: 2003-09-30
The EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to
the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP). This includes revisions that
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) submitted to EPA
on January 3, 2003, to require that equipment associated with a new or
relocated concrete crushing facility be located or operated at least
440
PROPOSED RULES: Kentucky,
Published: 2003-11-03
EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Jefferson
County, Kentucky portion of the Kentucky State Implementation Plan
(SIP) which amends four regulations of the Metro Louisville Air
Pollution Control District (MLAPCD). The four MLAPCD regulations being
revised are: Regulation 1.08, ``Administrative Procedures,'' Regulation
2.05, ``Prevention
RULES: Indiana,
Published: 2003-12-11
EPA is approving revisions to the oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) budget trading program submitted by Indiana on June
26, 2003, and August 4, 2003. These changes revise Indiana's
NOX State Implementation Plan (SIP) and NOX
budget approved by EPA on November 8, 2001. The most significant change
adds 17 units from three
PROPOSED RULES: Maryland,
Published: 2003-01-16
EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Maryland. The purpose of this SIP is
to request a sixmonth extension of the Federal deadline for
incorporating checks of Onboard Diagnostic (OBD) systems on 1996and
newer vehicles to Maryland's motor vehicle inspection and maintenance
(I/M) program. EPA's
RULES: California,
Published: 2003-02-13
EPA is making an interim final determination to stay and/or
defer imposition of sanctions based on a proposed approval of revisions
to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
(SJVUAPCD or District) portion of the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP) published elsewhere in today's Federal Register. The
revisions concern
RULES: Indiana,
Published: 2003-03-03
Due to adverse comments, the EPA is withdrawing the direct
final rule which conditionally approved the revisions to Indiana's
State Implementation Plan for the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration provisions for attainment areas. In the direct final rule
published on January 15, 2003 (68 FR 1970), EPA stated that if EPA
receives adverse
PROPOSED RULES: Missouri,
Published: 2003-03-26
EPA proposes to approve a revision to the Missouri State
Implementation Plan (SIP) which pertains to the control of emissions
from surface coating operations in the Kansas City, Missouri, area.
This revision clarifies an inconsistency between the SIP approved
version of the rule and the state adopted version. Approval of this
revision will ensure
PROPOSED RULES: California,
Published: 2003-04-25
EPA is proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval of
revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
District (SJVUAPCD) and YoloSolano Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
These revisions concern volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from
industries
RULES: California,
Published: 2003-06-03
EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD)
and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portions of
the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
volatile organic compound (VOC) and particulate matter (PM10)
emissions from
PROPOSED RULES: Missouri,
Published: 2003-06-18
EPA proposes to approve a revision to the Missouri State
Implementation Plan (SIP) which pertains to the control of emissions
from Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Installations in Kansas City and
St. Louis areas, respectively. This revision will rescind two rules
that have been superseded by the statewide Maximum Achievable Control
Technology rule.
PROPOSED RULES: Texas,
Published: 2003-07-09
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions of the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The plan revisions include changes that
Texas adopted to address deficiencies that were identified on January
7, 2002, and other changes adopted by Texas to regulations that include
provisions for PBR and standard permits. This includes revisions that
the Texas
PROPOSED RULES: California,
Published: 2003-08-11
EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Great Basin
Unified Air Pollution Control District (GBUAPCD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
permitting of sources that have the potential to emit above major
source thresholds but do not actually emit pollutants at those levels.
We are proposing to
PROPOSED RULES: Illinois,
Published: 2003-09-15
EPA is proposing approval of a revision to the Illinois State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the attainment and maintenance of the
onehour national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone
submitted by Illinois on April 11, 2003. Specifically, EPA is proposing
to approve Illinois' revised 2007 motor vehicle emission inventories
and 2007 Motor
RULES: Kentucky,
Published: 2003-10-14
The EPA is approving a source-specific revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. This
revision requires the Marathon Ashland Petroleum Marine Repair Terminal
(MAPMRT) to implement volatile organic compound (VOC) reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for its barge cleaning operation as
part of a
PROPOSED RULES: Montana,
Published: 2003-11-19
EPA is proposing to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the Governor of Montana on June 26, 1997, and
June 13, 2000. (Portions of the June 26, 1997, submittal were withdrawn
by the Governor of Montana on February 8, 1999.) These revisions
contain an inventory of emissions for Thompson Falls and establish and
require
